The differentiated approach to the choice of surgical treatment options in patients with metastatic lesions of long bones

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872017154-63

Keywords:

metastasis of long bones of limbs, surgical treatment, the prognosis of patients survival

Abstract

Metastatic lesions of long bones (MLLB) are one of the most frequent pathologies among all bone tumor diseases.

Objective: to substantiate and develop a differentiated approach to the choice of indications to authorities retain the surgical treatment of pa­tients with metastatic lesions of long bones.

Methods: the results of the examination and treatment of 104 patients with metastatic lesions of long bones. The main factors affecting the patients survive are the initial diagnosis, the amount of metastatic le­sions of long bones, pathological fracture, relapse-free period of a period, visceral dissemination, histological type of tumor, the type of metastatic lesions of long bones, according to ASA class, age of the patient. With the help of the method of mathematical modeling of the mechanical properties comparison us «implant – bone» o f t he system i n different types o f replace­ment post-resection defects in proximal and distal femur me­taphysis.

Results: for to facilitate the prediction of survival of patients developed a computer program that make work-up data of the patient. The program determines the probability for a patient belonging to a survival group: I — up to 6 months, II — from 6 to 24 months, III — more than 2 years. Depend­ing on the survival prognosis developed indications for surgi­cal interventions and their types (palliative or radical). Justi­fy the most effective methods of substitution of post-resection defects braid children due to the localization of metastatic le­sions of long bones. Developed and implemented into practice the method of substitution of metaphysial defects of the distal femur using the metal construction. A tactics of surgical treat­ment of patients with primary metastatic lesions of long bones has been proposed.

Conclusions: the use of the proposed tactic of treatment of patients with metastatic lesions of long bones allows substantiate indications for surgical interventions and their specific type, to prevent unreasonable and, accordingly, re­peated operations.

References

  1. Westrich GH, Haas SB, Mosca P, Peterson M. Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(6):795–800.
  2. Preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Evidence-based guideline and evidence report. 2nd ed. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2011. Available from: http://www. aaos.org/research/guidelines/VTE/VTE_full_guideline.pdf.
  3. Colwell Jr CW, Froimson MI, Anseth SD, Giori NJ, Hamilton WG, Barrack RL, Buehler KC, Mont MA, Padgett DE, Pulido PA, Barnes CL. A mobile compression device for thrombosis prevention in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(3):177–83. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01031.
  4. Lotke PA, Palevsky H, Keenan AM, Meranze S, Steinberg ME, Ecker ML, Kelley MA. Aspirin and warfarin for thromboembolic disease after total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:251–8.
  5. Lussana F, Squizzato A, Permunian ET, Cattaneo M. A systematic review on the effect of aspirin in the prevention of post-operative arterial thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Thromb Res. 2014;134(3):599–603. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.06.027.
  6. Pellegrini Jr. VD, Sharrock NE, Paiement GD, Morris R, Warwick DJ. Venous thromboembolic disease after total hip and knee arthroplasty: current perspectives in a regulated environment. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:637–61.
  7. Reitman RD, Emerson RH, Higgins LL, Tarbox TR. A multimodality regimen for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(2):161–8. doi: 10.1054/arth.2003.50026.
  8. Morris RJ, Woodcock JP. Evidence-based compression: prevention of stasis and deep vein thrombosis. Ann Surg. 2004;239(2):162–71. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000109149.77194.6c.
  9. Review: Cothera VPULSE compression and cold therapy system for prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolisms. Medgadget, LLC. 2013. Available from: http://www.medgadget.com/2013/12/review-cothera-vpusle-compression-and-cold-therapy-system-for-prevention-of-deep-vein-thrombosis-and-pulmonary- embolisms.html.
  10. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Multimodal prophylaxis for THA with mechanical compression. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:225–30. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238861.84733.9d.
  11. Lu N, Salvati EA. Multimodal prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease after total hip and knee arthroplasty: current perspectives. Chin J Traumatol. 2010;3(6):362–69. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1275.2010.06.008
  12. Alcelik I, Pollock RD, Sukeik M, Bettany-Saltikov J, Armstrong PM, Fismer P. A comparison of outcomes with and without a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):331–40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.046.
  13. Ejaz A, Laursen AC, Kappel A, Laursen MB, Jakobsen T, Rasmussen S, Nielsen PT. Faster recovery without the use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(4):422–6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.931197.
  14. Gesell MW, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Bartolome Garcia S, Memtsoudis SG, Ma Y, Haas SB, Salvati EA. Safety and efficacy of multimodal thromboprophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of preferential aspirin vs. routine coumadin chemoprophylaxis. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(4):575–9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.004.
  15. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. New York: The Science Press, 1932. 55 p.
  16. Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol (Amst.). 2000;104(1):1–15.
  17. Parvizi J, Chen AF, Restrepo C, Uang RH, Cal J. Low dose aspirin: an effective chemoprophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolic events. Rothman Institute Conference Posters, 2015. Available from: http://jdc.jefferson.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=rothinsposters.
  18. Andrawis J, Akhavan S, Chan V. Lehil M, Pong D, Bozic KJ. Higher preoperative patient activation associated with better patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(8):2688–97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4247-4.
  19. Singh JA, Gabriel S, Lewallen D. The impact of gender, age, and preoperative pain severity on pain after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2717–23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0399-9.
  20. Thomas T, Robinson C, Champion D, McKell M, Pell M. Prediction and assessment of the severity of post-operative pain and of satisfaction with management. Pain. 1998;75(2–3):177–85.
  21. Della Valle CJ, Steiger DJ, Cesare PE Di. Thromboembolism after hip and knee arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6(6):327–36.

Downloads

How to Cite

Vyrva, O., Golovina, Y., & Malyk, R. (2017). The differentiated approach to the choice of surgical treatment options in patients with metastatic lesions of long bones. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872017154-63

Issue

No. 1 (2017)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Oleg Vyrva, Yanina Golovina, Roman Malyk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).