DOI: https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-5987201615-9

The nature and structure of pelvic area damage in patients with polytrauma andunstable pelvic ring

Nicolay Аnkin, Lev Аnkin, Vladimir Burluka, Andrey Tkachenko, Vladimir Salamashchak

Abstract


The goal: to investigate the nature and structure of the pelvic area injury (PAI) in casualties with severe concomitant injury and unstable pelvic ring.

The methods: the medical records of 406 casualties (157 survivors, 249 dead) with an unstable pelvis injury in polytrauma were analyzed. The severity of the injury was assessed according to the integral scales ISS, PTS, ATS. The con­clusion forensic examinations were studied for the dead.

Results: among different types of injury traffic accident (245; 60.3 %) and household injuries (136; 33.5 %) were predominated, from point of view of injury genesis — catatrauma (150; 36.9 %). Unstable pelvic injuries in polytrauma were diagnosed more than half of patients with PAI with a predominance of rotationally unstable fractures (type B) — 307 (75.6 %). Vertically unstable lesions (type C) were observed in 99 (24.4 %) cases. Concomitant acetabular fractures were observed in 11.8 % of patients, damage to the pelvic organs (PO) — in 24.1%. Among PO following ruptures were detected: bladder — 48 (11.8 %), urethra — 27 (6.7 %), rectum — 5 (1.2 %),uterus and ovarian — 3 (0.7 %), great vessels — 5 (1.2 %), sev­eral PO — 10 (2.5 %). The severity of the damage of the different anatomical regions (AR) according to the scales ISS, PTS, ATS in group of survivors and deaths did not differ significantly (p > 0.05),but from the point of view of general severity of injury the dif­ferences between the groups were significant (p < 0.05). Lethal outcome was recorded in 249 cases (61.3 %). The greatest number of casualties died at 1–3 days post-injury — 185 cases (74.3 %); 4–10-days — 42 cases (16.9 %), 10 days after trauma and more — 22 cases (8.8%). In 72 28.9 %) cases, the results of forensic medical examination did not match the final diagnosis of damage severity of pelvic ring injury.

Conclusions: unstable pelvic injury (type B and C) in patients with polytrauma was identified in 51.9 %of cases, while rotationally unstable fractures (type B) — 2/3. Vertically unstable fracture (type C) increases the risk of death by almost two times. Crucial to survival prognosis in polytrauma has a number of damaged AR due to the development of mutual burdening syndrome.


Keywords


structure, polytrauma, pelvic area, instability of the pelvic ring

References


Bokarev IM. Lechebno-diagnosticheskaya taktika u patsientov s sochetannoy travmoy zhivota i taza: abstract dis. the doctor of medical scince. 2006. 32 p.

Zarutskiy YaL, Denisenko VM, Zhovtonozhko OI, Burluka VV, et al. Sposib anatomichnoyi otsinki politravm. Patent 61359 UA. 2011.

Rzaev RS. Lechenie povrezhdeniy taza s narusheniem tselostnosti ego koltsa u postradavshih s shokogennoy travmoy: abstract dis. the candidate of medical scince. SPb. 2010. 22 p.

Sotnikova IS. Obosnovanie taktiki hirurgicheskogo lecheniya povrezhdeniy pryamoy kishki pri sochtennoy travme: abstract dis. the candidate of medical scince. Rostov-na-Donu, 2004. 158 p.

Tyimchenko SA. Osobennosti sovremennoy boevoy patologii uretryi: abstract dis. the candidate of medical scince. M., 2008.19 p.

Grimme K, Pape H, Probst C, et al. Calculation of different triage scores based on the German Trauma Registry. Eur J Trauma. 2005;31:480–487.

Morozumi J, Homma H, Ohta S, Noda M, Oda J, Mishima S, Yukioka T. Impact of mobile angiography in the emergency department for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability. J Trauma. 2010;68(1):90–95. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40061.

Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Suedkamp NP, Koestler W, Schmal H. Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J Trauma. 2008;64(2):449–455. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815982b1.

Pape HC, Krettek C. Management of fractures in the severely injured influence of the principle of «damage control orthopaedic surgery». Unfallchirurg. 2003;106(2):18–24.

Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Chan L. Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am. Coll. Surg. 2002;195 (1):1–10.

Smith WR, Ziran BH, Morgan SJ. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. NY: Inform. Healthcare, 2007. 371 p.

Sturmer KM, Neugebauer E. Guideline on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries. Germany, 2011. 421 p.

Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, et al. The Injury Severity Score: a method of describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluatiting emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–196.

Tile M. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. Williams & Wil-kins, 1995. 480 p.

Yerasimides J, Roberts CS. Pelvic fractures and genitourinary injuries. Curr. orthopaed. 2005;19:354–361.




Copyright (c) 2016 Nicolay Аnkin, Lev Аnkin, Vladimir Burluka, Andrey Tkachenko, Vladimir Salamashchak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.