Evolution of metal constructs in orthopedic surgery of osteogenesis imperfecta

Authors

  • Anatoly Krys-Pugach
  • Andrey Zyma
  • Yuriy Guk
  • Tamara Kincha-Polishchuk
  • Stepan Martsynyak
  • Andrey Chewerda
  • Andrey Zotya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872014475-79

Keywords:

osteogenesis imperfecta, intramedullary telescopicconstructs, surgical treatment

Abstract

Objective: To improve outcomes of surgical treatment of bone deformities in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Methods: At the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics for Childhood of the SI «ITO NAMSU» treated 11 patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. We performed 23 surgeries with the use of intramedullary «growing» telescopic constructs to correct thighs and shin deformities. Results: In 9 patients for the correction of axial deformities of the lower limbs we used for osteosynthesis «growing» telescopic constructs. Their advantage is as follows: prevention of repeated fractures and bone deformities, and their disadvantages are as follows: danger of the rotational displacement for bone fragments and their displacement in length as well as inability to create compression in the osteotomy region. In this regard, in 2 patients we used an improved surgical procedure. On the first stage we performed corrective osteotomy and intramedullary nailing with locking rod and the distal part of the T-shaped telescopic component; on the second one locking screws were removed and construction was transferred into the «growing» kind after fusion of the fragments. In all cases fusion was obtained in due course. There was no violation of bone growth in length, repeated fractures and deformities. In one patient fixateur was replaced due to the divergence of its elements, in one more patient fixed bone pseudosarkoma ostoperatively. Conclusion: an improved method for the surgical treatment of bone deformities using intramedullary telescopic construct which is based on association of the principles of blocking compressive osteosynthesis and intramedullary osteosynthesis with «growing» telescopic rod is effective in cases of osteogenesis imperfecta and is accompanied by a low complication rate.

References

  1. Hyperplastic callus formation in osteogenesis imperfecta / H. W. Lehmann, A. Nerlich, R. E. Brenner [et al.] // Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. — 1992. — Vol. 2 (5). — P. 281–284.
  2. Sillence D. Osteogenesis imperfecta: Anex panding panorama of variants / D. Sillence // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. — 1981. — Vol. 159. — Р. 11.
  3. Van Dijk F. S. Osteogenesis imperfecta: clinical diagnosis, nomenclature and severity assessment / F. S. Van Dijk, D. O. Sillence // Am. J. Med. Genet. — 2014. — Vol. 164-A (6). — P. 1470–1481, doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36545.
  4. Esposito P. I. Surgical treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta: current concepts / P. I. Esposito, H. Plotkin // Curr. Opin. Pediatr. — 2008. — Vol. 20 (1). — Р. 52–57, doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f35f03.
  5. Osteogenesis imperfecta: practical treatment guidelines / F. I. Antoniazzi, M. Mottes, P. Fraschini [et al.] // Paediatr. Drugs. — 2000. — Vol. 2 (6). — Р. 465–488.
  6. Brunelli P. C. Complications of elongating intramedullary rodding in osteogenesis imperfecta / P. C. Brunelli, P. Novati // Am. J. Med. Genet. — 1993. — Vol. 45. — P. 275.
  7. Mulpuri K. I. Intramedullary rodding in osteogenesis imperfecta / K. I. Mulpuri, B. Joseph // J. Pediatr. Orthop. — 2000. — Vol. 20 (2). — Р. 267–273.
  8. Joseph B. I. The choice of intramedullary devices for the femur and the tibia in osteogenesis imperfecta / B. I. Joseph, G. Rebello // J. Pediatr. Orthop. — 2005. — Vol. 14-B (5). — Р. 311–319.
  9. Karbowski A. I. Experiences with different telescope nails in treatment of pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta / A. I. Karbowski, M. Schwitalle, A. Eckardt // Zentr. Chir. — 1998. — Vol. 123 (11). — Р. 1252–1256.
  10. Use of the Sheffield telescopic intramedullary rod system for the management of osteogenesis imperfecta: clinical outcomes at an average follow-up of nineteen years / N. I. Nicolaou, J. D. Bowe, J. M. Wilkinson [et al.] // J. Bone Joitn Surg. — 2011. — Vol. 93-A (21). — Р. 1994–2000, doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01893.
  11. Jerosch J. I. Complications after treatment of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta with a Bailey-Dubow rod / J. I. Jerosch, I. Mazzotti, M. Tomasevic // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. — 1998. — Vol. 117 (4–5). — Р. 240–245.
  12. Fassier-Duval femoral rodding in children with osteogenesis imperfecta receiving bisphosphonates: functional outcomes at one year / J. Ruck, N. Dahan-Oliel, K. Montpetit // J. Child. Orthop. — 2011. — Vol. 5 (3). — Р. 217–224, doi: 10.1007/s11832-011-0341-7.
  13. Laidlaw A. T. I. Telescoping intramedullary rodding with ailey-Dubow nails for recurrent pathologic fractures in children without osteogenesis imperfecta / A. T. I. Laidlaw, R. T. Loder, R. N. Hensinger // J. Pediatr. Orthop. — 1998. —Vol. 18 (1). — Р. 4–8.

How to Cite

Krys-Pugach, A., Zyma, A., Guk, Y., Kincha-Polishchuk, T., Martsynyak, S., Chewerda, A., & Zotya, A. (2014). Evolution of metal constructs in orthopedic surgery of osteogenesis imperfecta. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (4), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872014475-79

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES