STRESS-DEFORMED STATE OF THE ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT IN CASE OF DAMAGE TO THE UPPER ACROMIOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENT SUPERIOR AND VARIOUS METHODS OF FIXATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024233-41

Keywords:

Acromioclavicular joint, ligaments, fixation

Abstract

During the operative stabilization of the acromial end of the clavicle (AEC) for its dislocation, there are two ways: clavicle – beaklike process, clavicle – acromial process. Fixation of the AEC to the acromial process of the scapula is a priority. Competing metal structures are the hook plate and the Weber method. The significant disadvantages of using the Weber method of fixation are the migration of the tips and the violation of their integrity and
the wire. Objective. To conduct a comparative analysis of the fixation of the acromial end of the clavicle according to Weber, hook plate and the proposed construction, by studying the stressed-deformed state of the clavicular-acromial joint in case of damage to the lig. acromioclavicular superior and various methods of fixation. Methods. A finite-element model of the clavicular-acromial joint was constructed. Damage to the ligaments was modeled. claviculo-acoacromiale superior, as well as fixation of AEC in three ways: according to Weber, hook plate and the proposed construction. Results. The best results, from the point of view of reducing the level of stresses in intact ligaments, are provided by fixation of the AEC according to Weber, but its use leads
to an increase in the level of stresses on the AEC and the acromial process of the scapula, which can cause destruction of the latter. The hinge-type fixator provides the best stress distribution, both in the bony elements of the model and in intact ligaments. The hook plate holder occupies an average position,
both in terms of the level of stress and the magnitude of the relative deformations in the ligaments. Conclusions. Weber fixation provides the best results for reducing the level of stresses and relative strains in the intact ligaments, but leads to a several-fold increase in the level of stresses on the AEC and acromial process of the scapula. The hook plate holder occupies an average position, both in terms of the stress level and the magnitude of the relative
deformations in the ligaments. The proposed design provides the best stress distribution, both in the bony elements of the model and in the intact ligaments.

Author Biographies

Olexander Buryanov, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine

MD, Prof. in Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volodymyr Kvasha, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine

MD, Prof. in Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Dmytro Chekushyn, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine

MD

Mykhailo Zadnychenko, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine

MD, PhD

References

  1. Buryanov, O. A., Kvasha, V. P., Chekushin, D. A., & Naumenko, V. O. (2021). Analysis of long-term results of surgical treatment of dislocations of the acromial end of the clavicle. Trauma, 22(6), 4-9. doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706. (in Ukrainian)
  2. Fade, G. E., & Scullion, J. E. (2002). Hook plate fixation for lateral-clavicular malunion. АО Dialogue, 15(1), 14-18.
  3. Judet, J. (1976). Les luxations acromoclaviculares recentes. Chirurgi, 102(12), 1016-1019.
  4. Pan, X., Lv, R., Lv, M., & Zhang, D. (2020). TightRope vs clavicular hook plate for Rockwood III–V Acromioclavicular dislocations: A meta-analysis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 12(4), 1045-1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12724
  5. Ozan, F., Gщk, S., Okur, K. T., Altun, İ., Kahraman, M., Gгnay, A. E., & Yamak, K. (2020). Midterm results of tension band wiring technique for acute Rockwood type III Acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Cureus. 12(12): e12203. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12203
  6. Bur’yanov, O. A., Kvasha, V. P., Martsyokha, A.V. & Chekushin, D. A. Patent No. 12472, UA MPK A61B17/56. Extra-articular dynamic fixator for dislocations of the acromial end of the clavicle; O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University. Application u201709326; 15,11.2017; 25.04.2018, Bul. No. 8. (in Ukrainian)
  7. Cowin, S. C. (2001). Bone Mechanics Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  8. Boccaccio, A., & Pappalettere, C. (2011). Mechanobiology of fracture healing: Basic principles and applications in orthodontics and orthopaedics. Theoretical Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.5772/19420
  9. Niinomi, M. (2008). Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 1(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.07.001
  10. Berezovsky, V. A., & Kolotilov, N. N. (1990). Biophysical characteristics of human tissues. Directory. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. (in russian)
  11. Karpinsky, M., Yaresko, O., Pavlenko, K., Topor, V., Uvarova, O., & Popov, O. (2014). Mathematical modeling of options for osteosynthesis of middle third clavicle fractures. ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, 0(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-5987201445-13
  12. Chang, Y., Hughes, R. E., Su, F., Itoi, E., & An, K. (2000). Prediction of muscle force involved in shoulder internal rotation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 9(3), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2000.105135
  13. Rao, S. S. (2005). The Finite Element Method in Engineering: Elsevier Science 14. Kurowski, P. M. (2007). Engineering Analysis with COSMOSWorks 2007: SDC Publications.

How to Cite

Buryanov, O., Kvasha, V. ., Chekushyn, D., Zadnychenko, M. ., Karpinsky, M., & Yaresko, O. . (2024). STRESS-DEFORMED STATE OF THE ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT IN CASE OF DAMAGE TO THE UPPER ACROMIOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENT SUPERIOR AND VARIOUS METHODS OF FIXATION. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (2), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024233-41

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES