THE STUDY OF THE WORK OF THE MUSCLES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE HIP JOINT AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES

Authors

  • Stanislav Bondarenko Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2463-5919
  • Dmytro Sereda Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Olena Karpinska Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-7733

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024224-32

Keywords:

Hip joint, muscle strength, walking pattern, lateral approach, anterior approach

Abstract

Muscles that can be damaged during endoprosthesis are indicated. Objective. To study the features of muscle work to ensure walking function after hip arthroplasty depending on the surgical approach. Methods. The basis of the simulation is the basic OpenSim Gate2392 model. Six models were created that predicted the condition of the muscles of the lower limb in normal conditions, during coxarthrosis and after 6 and 12 months. after surgery with lateral and anterior approaches. The results. For lateral access in 6 months. after the operation, the adductor muscles responsible for stabilizing the pelvis in the single-support phase of the step and during the transfer of the foot do not work enough, while the hip flexor muscles (in the model, the rectus femoris muscle) take over the responsibility for the step, but with overvoltage. On the contrary, with the front approach, we observe a weakening of the flexor muscles, which leads to overstrain of the gluteal muscles and hip stabilizer muscles. After 12 months, the muscle strength normalizes for most of them to 90–95 % of the norm, a 2–3 times increase in the torque of the hip flexor muscles and hip stabilizer muscles is observed. Taking a normal step causes muscle strain. During the anterior approach, the foot is transferred during the phase, that is, when most of the muscles are involved. The rectus femoris muscle, which is the strongest of the muscles discussed in the paper, does the main work of moving the foot. In the case of possible damage to the rectus muscle during anterior access, even after a year there is a violation of its work — excessive overexertion and involvement of the reserves of other muscles. Conclusions. Mathematical modeling of the work of muscles that may be damaged during hip arthroplasty surgery, conditional muscle strength for 6 months. after the operation, they are not able to develop the necessary torque to take a normal step. For muscle strength, which in the model corresponded to 12 months,
the muscles are able to perform a normal function regardless of surgical access, but their overstrain is observed.

Author Biographies

Stanislav Bondarenko, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

MD, DSci in Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Dmytro Sereda, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

MD

References

  1. Bertocci, G. E., Munin, M. C., Frost, K. L., Burdett, R., Wassinger, C. A., & Fitzgerald, S. G. (2004). Isokinetic performance after total hip replacement. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 83(1), 1-9.
  2. Delp, S. L., Anderson, F. C., Arnold, A. S., Loan, P., Habib, A., John, C. T., Guendelman, E., & Thelen, D. G. (2007). OpenSim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(11), 1940-1950.
  3. Ganderton, C., Pizzari, T., Harle, T., Cook, J., & Semciw, A. (2017). Gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and tensor fascia latae are overactive during gait in postmenopausal women with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20, e72. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1823221_A_review_of_the_anatomy_of_the_hip_abductor_muscles_gluteus_medius_gluteus_minimus_and_tensor_fascia_lata
  4. Greco, A. J., & Vilella, R. C. (2020). Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Gluteus Minimus Muscle. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
  5. Hamm, K. (n. d.). Biomechanics of Human Movement [E-book]. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/humanbiomechanics/
  6. Higgins, B. T., Barlow, D. R., Heagerty, N. E., & Lin, T. J. (2015). Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 30(3), 419-434. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.020
  7. Holm, B., Thorborg, K., Husted, H., Kehlet, H., & Bandholm, T. (2013). Surgery-induced changes and early recovery of hip-muscle strength, leg-press power, and functional performance after fast-track total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62109. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062109
  8. (2015). I Downloaded OpenSim: Now What? Introductory OpenSim Tutorial. GCMAS: Annual Meeting, Portland 9. Ilchmann, T., Gersbach, S., Zwicky, L., & Clauss, M. (2013). Standard Transgluteal versus Minimal Invasive Anterior Approach in hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Consecutive Cohort Study. Orthopedic reviews, 5(4), e31. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2013.e31
  9. John, C. T., Anderson, F. C., Higginson, J. S., & Delp, S. L. (2012). Stabilisation of walking by intrinsic muscle properties revealed in a three-dimensional muscle-driven simulation. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.627560
  10. Judd, D. L., Dennis, D. A., Thomas, A. C., Wolfe, P., Dayton, M. R., & Stevens-Lapsley, J. E. (2014). Muscle strength and functional recovery during the first year after THA. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(2), 654-664.
  11. Kassarjian, A., Tomas, X., Cerezal, L., Canga, A., & Llopis, E. (2011). MRI of the quadratus femoris muscle: anatomic considerations and pathologic lesions. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 197(1), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5898
  12. Kendall, F. P., McCreary, E. K., & Provance, P. G. (2006). Muscles: Testing and Function With Posture and Pain (5th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  13. Lanting, B. A., Hartley, K. C., Raffoul, A. J., Burkhart, T. A., Sommerville, L., Martin, G. R., Howard, J. L., & Johnson, M. (2017). Bikini versus traditional incision direct anterior approach: is there any difference in soft tissue damage? Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 27(4), 397–400. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000478.
  14. Liu, M. Q., Anderson, F. C., Schwartz, M. H., & Delp, S. L. (2008). Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds. Journal of Biomechanics, 41(15), 3243-3252
  15. Mansfield, P. J., & Neumann, D. A. (2018). Essentials of kinesiology for the physical therapist assistant e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780323544986/essentials-of-kinesiology-for-thephysical-therapist-assistant
  16. Matta, J. M., Shahrdar, C., & Ferguson, T. (2005). Singleincision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 441, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194309.70518.cb
  17. Mjaaland, K. E., Kivle, K., Svenningsen, S., & Nordsletten, L. (2019). Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial
  18. Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA? Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 477(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000439
  19. Moore, K. L., Dalley, A. F., & Agur, A. M. (2014). Clinically oriented anatomy (7th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  20. Opensimconfluence.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpageattachments. action?pageId=53086215&preview=%2F53086215%2F53092279%2FMuscleIsometricForces%202.pdf
  21. Palastanga, N., & Soames, R. (2012). Anatomy and Human Movement: Structure and Function (6th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone.
  22. Presswood, L., Cronin, J., Keogh, J. W., & Whatman, C. (2008). Gluteus medius: Applied anatomy, dysfunction, assessment, and progressive strengthening. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 30(5), 41-53. DOI: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e318187f19a
  23. Rasch, A., Bystrоm, A. H., Dalеn, N., Martinez-Carranza, N., & Berg, H. E. (2009). Persisting muscle atrophy two years after replacement of the hip. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 91(5), 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21477.
  24. Reiman, M. P., Bolgla, L. A., & Loudon, J. K. (2012). A literature review of studies evaluating gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation during rehabilitation exercises. Physiotherapy theory and practice, 28(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2011.604981
  25. Roth, T., Rahm, S., Jungwirth-Weinberger, A., Süess, J., Sutter, R., Schellenberg, F., Taylor, W. R., Snedeker, J. G., Widmer, J., & Zingg, P. (2021). Restoring range of motion in reduced acetabular version by increasing femoral antetorsion — What about joint load? Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 87, 105409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105409
  26. Shao, Q., Bassett, D. N., Manal, K., & Buchanan, T. S. (2009). An EMG-driven model to estimate muscle forces and joint moments in stroke patients. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 39(12), 1083-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.09.002
  27. Siccardi, M. A., Tariq, M. A., & Valle, C. (2023). Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Psoas Major. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
  28. Supra, R., Supra, R., & Agrawal, D. K. (2023). Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine, 5(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.26502/josm.511500106
  29. Zhao, G., Zhu, R., Jiang, S., Xu, N., Bao, H., & Wang, Y. (2020). Using the anterior capsule of the hip joint to protect the tensor fascia lata muscle during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 21(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3035-9]
  30. Strafun, S. S., Fishchenko, O. V., Moskovko, G. S., & Karpinska, O. D. (2018). Clinical studies of walking parameters of patients with coxarthrosis according to the GAITRite system. Trauma, 19(6), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.6.19.2018.152221
  31. Tyazhelov, A. A., Karpinsky, M. Yu., Yurchenko, D. A., Karpinska, O. D., & Goncharova, L. E. (2022). Mathematical modeling as a tool to study the function of pelvic girdle muscles in dysplastic coxarthrosis. Trauma, (1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.1.23.2022.876
  32. Tyazhelov, O. A., Karpinsky, M. Yu., Karpinsky, O. D., Branitsky, O. Yu., & Obeydat, Kh. (2020). Pathological postural patterns under conditions of long-term course of osteoarthritis of the joints of the lower extremities. Orthopedics, traumatology and prosthetics, (1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872020126-32

Downloads

How to Cite

Bondarenko, S., Sereda, D. ., & Karpinska, O. . (2024). THE STUDY OF THE WORK OF THE MUSCLES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE HIP JOINT AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024224-32

Issue

No. 2 (2024)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).