Proximal femoral corrective osteotomies from the standpoint of subsequent arthroplasty (view on the problem)

Authors

  • Oleksandr Oleynik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720143122-128

Keywords:

intertrochanteric osteotomy, complicated artroplasty, hip joint

Abstract

Every year in the world they perform about 1 million of total hip replacements (THR). In 6–10 % of patients with pathology of this joint they observe significant violations of configuration of the articular surface in the form of deformities and defects. Destructive changes in the hip joint (HJ) are also associated with proximal femoral corrective osteotomies (PFCO) and require THR. During reconstructive surgery it is necessary to restore normal anatomic relationships between the bone structures that form the HJ. This is due to physiological biomechanics of movement in the HJ which is possible just upon condition of restoration of its anatomical shape. In this paper we assessed the impact of PFCO in adults to possible further implantation of the endoprosthesis taking into account some technical features of surgery. It was established that PFCO in adults cause significant changes in the anatomical shape of the proximal femur manifesting with polygonal deformations of metaepiphysis and medullary canal. Pathological restructuring of bone structures associated with overgrowth medullary canal at the level of osteotomy and the formation of zones of local osteoporosis or cavities in the proximal metaepiphysis. These factors contribute to adverse outcomes for individual THR which is displayed in a large number of early postoperative complications due to the instability of the endoprosthesis' components. However one should note that in the last decade possibilities of diagnostic equipment significantly increased which creates prerequisites for early diagnosis of degenerative joint diseases at a new level. In this regard renaissance of reconstructive surgeries on the HJ is quite possible.

References

  1. Bombelli R. Ostearthritis of the hip: pathologenesis and consequent therapy / R. Bombelli. — Berlin: New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983. — 386 p.
  2. Cabanela M M . E. Proximal femoral deformity: bent but not broken / M. E. Cabanela // Orthopedics. — 2004. — Vol. 27, № 9. — P. 953–954.
  3. Porcher R. Reporting results of orthopaedic research: confidence intervals and values / R. Porcher // Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. — 2009. — Vol. 467 (10). — P. 2736–2737.
  4. Ochsner P. E. Total hip replacement / P. E. Ochsner. — Berlin: Springer, 2003. — 243 p.
  5. Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus / F. Pauwels. — New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980. — 532 p.
  6. Schatzker I. The intertrochanteric osteotomy / I. Schatzker. — Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1984. — 201 p.
  7. Shigematsu M M . Total hip arthoplasty after revision proximal femoral osteotomy / M. Shigematsu, T. Hotokebuchi // Clin. Calcium. — 2007. — Vol. 17, № 6. — P. 947–953.
  8. Spotorno L. The CLS uncemented total hip replacement system / L. Spotorno, S. Romagnoli. — Thun: Werbelinie AG, 1991. — 26 p.
  9. Total hip arthroplasty after previous transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for femoral head osteonecrosis / Lee Young-Kyun, Ha Yong-Chan, Kim Ki-Choul [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. — 2009. — Vol. 5. — P. 1205–1209.
  10. Weisl H. Intertrochanteric osteotomy for osteoarthritis. A long-term follow-up / H. Weisl // J. Bone Joint Surg. — 1980. — Vol. 62-B. — P. 37–42.

How to Cite

Oleynik, O. (2014). Proximal femoral corrective osteotomies from the standpoint of subsequent arthroplasty (view on the problem). ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720143122-128

Issue

Section

IN AID OF PRACTING DOCTOR. LECTURES