Reconstructive surgeries in the case of the knee joint osteoarthritis

Authors

  • Olexii Popsuishapka Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education. Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Valerii Lytvyshko Kharkiv National Medical University. Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Olga Pidgaiska Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-977X
  • Nataliya Ashukina Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-7440
  • Kostiantyn Romanenko Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education. Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1639-8274
  • Zinaida Danуshchuk Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-3821

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720223-429-38

Keywords:

knee joint arthritis, pain, meniscus degeneration, peri-articular deformity, surgical treatment, external rod fixator

Abstract

Objective. To clarify the indications and volume of reconstructive surgeries under conditions of knee joint arthritis and to improve the methods of surgical correction of peri-articular deformations using an external rod fixator. Methods. During the last 10 years (2012‒2022), reconstructive surgeries were performed in 45 patients (49 joints). Indications for surgery were based on the study of pain and its localization, peri-articular deformation of the limb, ultrasound (USD) and X-ray examinations. Results. Indications for certain reconstructive surgical interventions on the knee joint are substantiated. The role of pathological changes of the meniscus in the development of knee joint arthritis has been determined. The positive clinical effect of paracapsular resection of the front part of the meniscus with hyperplastic growths of synovial tissue is shown. Deformation of the extremety (43 patients — with varus deformity, 2 — with valgus deformity) limited the function of the limb and caused pain. Surgical treatment in such cases were aimed at eliminating the deformation of the proximal part of the tibia. The types of osteotomies, the features of the author's rod external fixation device application, and the postoperative management of patients are presented. Due to external fixator, it is possible to perform, if necessary, angular correction of the limb axis during the period when the patient begins to walk with partial weight bearing, and the functional load of the limb makes it possible to achieve fusion of fragments within 3.5–4 months. A long-term positive clinical effect was obtained in 42 (93 %) patients. Conclusions. Indications for pathogenetic treatment should be based, first of all, on the identification of the source (or pathogenesis) of the pain syndrome, then on the analysis of the type and magnitude of peri-articular deformation of the limb, signs of functional insufficiency of the limb associated with it. In the third place, the X-ray signs should be analyzed. Elimination of angular peri-articular deformation of the limb has a positive effect on the course of knee arthritis, reduces pain, increases physical activity, and slows down the progression of cartilage destruction.

Author Biographies

Olexii Popsuishapka, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education. Ukraine

MD, Prof. in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Valerii Lytvyshko, Kharkiv National Medical University. Ukraine

MD, DMSci in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Olga Pidgaiska, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Nataliya Ashukina, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

PhD in Biol. Sci.

Kostiantyn Romanenko, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education. Ukraine

MD, PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Zinaida Danуshchuk, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

MD

References

  1. Cui, A., Li, H., Wang, D., Zhong, J., Chen, Y., & Lu, H. (2020). Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine, 29-30, 100587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587.
  2. Loeser, R. F., Goldring, S. R., Scanzello, C. R., & Goldring, M. B. (2012). Osteoarthritis: A disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 64(6), 1697–1707. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34453
  3. Vina, E. R., & Kwoh, C. K. (2018). Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 30(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000479
  4. Lewis, P. L., Graves, S. E., Robertsson, O., Sundberg, M., Paxton, E. W., Prentice, H. A., & W-Dahl, A. (2020). Increases in the rates of primary and revision knee replacement are reducing: a 15-year registry study across 3 continents. Acta Orthopaedica, 91(4), 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1749380
  5. Hamilton, D. F., Howie, C. R., Burnett, R., Simpson, A. H. R. W., & Patton, J. T. (2015). Dealing with the predicted increase in demand for revision total knee arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(6), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.35185
  6. Patel, A., Pavlou, G., Mújica-Mota, R. E., & Toms, A. D. (2015). The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(8), 1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b8.35170
  7. Osadchuk, T. I., Kalashnikov, A. V., Khyts, O. V. (2021). Gonarthrosis: prevalence and differential ap-proach to endoprosthesis [Honartroz: poshyrenistʹ ta dyfer-entsiynyy pidkhid do endoprotezuvannya]. Ukrainian Medical Journal, 6 (146), XI/XII, 80‒84. https://doi.org/10.32471/umj.1680-3051.146.222998 (in Ukrainian)
  8. Karas, V., Calkins, T. E., Bryan, A. J., Culvern, C., Nam, D., Berger, R. A., Rosenberg, A. G., & Della Valle, C. J. (2019). Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(10), 2392–2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.018
  9. Pavlova, V. N., Pavlov, G. G., Shostak, N. A., Slutskiy, L. I. (2011).The joints [Sustav]. Moscow : Meditsinskoye informatsionnoye agentstvo. (in russian)
  10. Orlyansky, V., Golovakha, M. L. (2020). Osteotomy in the area of the knee joint [Osteot-omii v oblasti kolennogo sustava]. Zaporizhzhia. (in russian)
  11. Krupko, I. L. (1964). Internal injuries of the knee joint [Vnutrenniye povrezhdeniya kolennogo sustava]. Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, No 2, 3‒14. (in russian)
  12. Yanson Kh. А. Biomechanics of the human lower limb [Biome-khanika nizhney konechnosti cheloveka ] / Kh. A. Yanson. — Riga, 1975. (in russian)
  13. Korzh, N. A., Dedukh, N. V., Zupanets, I. A. (2007). Osteoarthritis: conservative therapy [Osteoartroz: konservativnaya terapiya]. Kharkiv : Gold pages, 14‒43. (in russian)
  14. State registration certificate 10276/211 «Rod devices for connecting bone fragments in the treatment of limb frac-tures» TU.U 33.1-35700506-001:2011. According to the order of the State Medical Inspectorate of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine from 15.03.2011 [Svidotstvo pro derzhavnu reye-stratsiyu 10276/211 «Prystroyi stryzhnevi dlya z’yednannya kistkovykh vidlamkiv pry likuvanni perelomiv kintsivok» TU.U 33.1-35700506-001:2011. Zhidno z nakazom Derzh-likinspektsiyi MOZ Ukrayiny vid 15.03.2011]. (in Ukrainian)

How to Cite

Popsuishapka, O. ., Lytvyshko, V. ., Pidgaiska, O. ., Ashukina, N. ., Romanenko, K. ., & Danуshchuk Z. . (2023). Reconstructive surgeries in the case of the knee joint osteoarthritis. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3-4), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720223-429-38

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES