A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of patients with long bone tumors using bone segmental alloimplants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720221-226-33Keywords:
Malignant bone tumors, bone allograft, surgical treatment of malignant bone tumorsAbstract
The most common techniques for the replacement of post-resection bone defects in patients with tumors are modular and individual
endoprosthetics and bioreconstructive interventions. The following issues require solution: improvement and development of techniques
for fixation of segmental allograft and recipient bone, study of bone remodeling processes in conditions of bone allograft and
cytostatics (chemotherapy drugs) action, improvement of segmental allograft quality. Objective. To determine the indications
for allograft replacement of post-resection defects of long bones (and its types) in patients with malignant bone tumors. Methods.
Experimental studies were carried out to study morphological, biomechanical, biochemical changes in experimental rats after bone
allograft under different conditions. Using the finite element method, the tensely deformed conditions in the «allograft – recipientbone
– endoprosthesis» system were assessed to determine the most effective fixation technique of the bone allograft and recipient bone
in imitation of a bone regenerate in different terms after surgery. Results. The effectiveness of allograft prosthesis composite technique
with a step-cut osteotomy and additional bone autoplasty in the contact zone of the allograft and the recipient bone was proven.
It was determined that the use of radiation-sterilized bone allograft in combination with systemic administration of cytostatics leads to
inhibition of bone formation. We developed an algorithm-scheme of surgical treatment of patients with tumors of long bones using
segmental allograft and proposed methods of replacement of postresection bone defects for each localization of tumor lesions. Clinical
approbation was performed. Conclusions. Segmental bone allograft of large post-resection defects of long bones at their tumorous
affection remains an actual and perspective technique of one bioreconstruction. Clear adherence to the indications for this technique
will help to prevent complications and repeated operations.
References
- Perez, J. R., Jose, J., Mohile, N. V., Boden, A. L., Greif, D. N., Barrera, C. M., … Pretell-Mazzini, J. (2020). Limb salvage reconstruction: Radiologic features of common reconstructive techniques and their complications. Journal of Orthopaedics, 21, 183–191. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.043
- Lesensky, J., & Prince, D. E. (2017). Distraction osteogenesis reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after primary tumor resection: Pitfalls and benefits. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 27 (6), 715–727. doi:10.1007/s00590-017-1998-5
- Baldwin, P., Li, D. J., Auston, D. A., Mir, H. S., Yoon, R. S., & Koval, K. J. (2019). Autograft, allograft, and bone Graft substitutes: Clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 33 (4), 203–213. doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000001420
- Gautam, D., Arora, N., Gupta, S., George, J., & Malhotra, R. (2021). Megaprosthesis versus allograft prosthesis composite for the management of massive skeletal defects: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 14 (3), 255–270. doi:10.1007/s12178-021-09707-6
- Gharedaghi, M., Peivandi, M. T., Mazloomi, M., Shoorin, H. R., Hasani, M., Seyf, P. , Khazaee, F. (2016). Evaluation of clinical results and complications of structural allograft reconstruction after bone tumor surgery. Arch Bone Joint Surgery, 4 (3), 236–242.
- MacDonald, D. J., McGuire, M. H. (1991). Complications with large fragment allografts. In K. L. Brown D. J. MacDonald, (ed.). Complications of Limb Salvage: Prevention, Management and Outcome. Montreal, ISOLS.
- Aponte-Tinao, L. A., Ayerza, M. A., Albergo, J. I., & Farfalli, G. L. (2019). Do massive allograft reconstructions for tumors of the femur and tibia survive 10 or more years after implantation? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 478(3), 517-524. doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000000806
- Hornicek, F. J., Gebhardt, M. C., Tomford, W. W., Sorger, J. I., Zavatta, M., Menzner, J. P., & Mankin, H. J. (2001). Factors affecting Nonunion of the allograft-host Junction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 382, 87-98. doi:10.1097/00003086-200101000-00014
- Vyrva, O., Golovina, O., & Malyk, R. (2015). Allograft-prosthesis composite for surgical treatment in patients with malignant tumors of the long bones (review). ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, 0(2), 120. doi:10.15674/0030-598720152120-125
- Cascio, B. M., Thomas, K. A., & Wilson, S. C. (2003). A mechanical comparison and review of transverse, step-cut, and sigmoid osteotomies. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 411, 296-304. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000069895.31220.e8
- Gundle, K. R. (2019). CORR insights®: Do massive allograft reconstructions for tumors of the femur and tibia survive 10 or more years after implantation? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 478 (3), 525–526. doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000000856
- Nguyen, H., Morgan, D. A., & Forwood, M. R. (2006). Sterilization of allograft bone: Effects of gamma irradiation on allograft biology and biomechanics. Cell and Tissue Banking, 8 (2), 93-105. doi:10.1007/s10561-006-9020-1
- Islam, A., Chapin, K., Moore, E., Ford, J., Rimnac, C., & Akkus, O. (2016). Gamma radiation sterilization reduces the high-cycle fatigue life of allograft bone. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 474 (3), 827-835. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4589-y
- Man, W. Y., Monni, T., Jenkins, R., & Roberts, P. (2016). Post-operative infection with fresh frozen allograft: Reported outcomes of a hospital-based bone bank over 14 years. Cell and Tissue Banking, 17 (2), 269-275. doi:10.1007/s10561-016-9547-8
- Stine, K. C., Wahl, E. C., Liu, L., Skinner, R. A., VanderSchilden, J., Bunn, R. C., … Lumpkin, C. K. (2013). Cisplatin inhibits bone healing during distraction osteogenesis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 32 (3), 464-470. doi:10.1002/jor.22527 16. Ke, B., Shi, L., Xu, Z., Wu, G., Gong, Y., Zhu, L., … Wang, X. (2018). Flavored Guilu Erxian decoction inhibits the injury of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by cisplatin. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 64 (6), 58-64. doi:10.14715/cmb/2018.64.6.11 17. Vyrva, O., Golovina, Y., Malyk, R., Danishchuk, Z., & Nikolchenko, O. (2017). Experimental and histological study of reparative osteogenesis in conditions of different methods of fixation during allograft alocompositive arthroplasty of long bones. ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, 0 (2), 70-77. doi:10.15674/0030-59872017270-77
- Vyrva, O., Golovina, Y., Karpinsky, M., Yaresko, A., & Malik, R. (2021). The study of the stress-strain state in the “implant-bone” system on the model of the allocomposite endoprosthesis of the proximal femur. TRAUMA, 21(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.1.21.2020.197797
- Vyrva, O., Golovina, Y., Karpinska, O., & Karpinsky, M. (2020). Biomechanical experimental substantiation of the fixation technique of bone allograft and recipient’s bone. ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, 0 (1), 40-45. doi:10.15674/0030-59872020140-45
- . 20. Vyrva, O., Holovina, Y., Ashukina, N., Malyk, R., & Danyshchuk, Z. (2021). Effects of gamma radiation and post-operative cisplatin injection on the incorporation of bone allografts in rats. Український радіологічний та онкологічний журнал, 29 (3), 51-62. doi:10.46879/ukroj.3.2021.51-62
- Vyrva, O., Golovina, Y., Leontyeva, F., & Malyk, R. (2022). Study of biochemical markers of osteogenesis in case of bone allografts incorporation in rats with followed after surgery administration of cisplatin at the different methods of implant sterilization. ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (4), 42-48. doi:10.15674/0030-59872021442-48
- Vyrva, О., Golovina, Ya., Malyk, R. (2020). Method of allocomposite endoprosthesis. Ukraine. Patent 145498 UA. (in Ukrainian)
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).