Mathematical modeling of the chest, its funnel-shaped deformation and thoracoplasty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872021217-22

Keywords:

thoracoplasty, mathematical mo­deling, chest, funnel-shaped

Abstract

The most common method of treating of the congenital funnel-shaped chest is thoracoplasty method by D. Nuss. During this surgery, a significant mechanical effect is created on the ribs, sternum, spinal column, which act instantly and continuously for a long time and create new biomechanical conditions for the «chest – rib – spine» system. Objective. To construct a functional model of the chest with a spinal column, which takes into account the movements in the costal-vertebral joints, it allows modeling the funnel-shaped deformation in conditions close to the reality, its operative  correction, predicting the results and choosing the optimal parameters of thoracoplasty. Methods. Normal and funnel-shaped chest models based on the articular connection of the ribs to the spine were created using SolidWorks. The main calculations were made using the ANSYS program. To estimate the stress-strain state (SSS), stresses are selected by Mises. Results. The created dynamic mathematical model of the chest makes it possible to conduct a reliable analysis of the biomechanical interaction of the plate with the chest, to analyze the stress-strain state of the constructed models in the norm, with and without taking into account the movements in the costal-vertebral joints. In addition, it allows to simulate the operation by D. Nuss and to study the biomechanical changes in conditions close to reality, occurring in the «chest – rib – spine» system, to determine the areas of maximum loads and safety boundaries. Conclusions. The reproduction of articular ribs rotation in the dynamic model changes the picture of the SSS distribution. In the case of modeling the correction of funnel-shaped deformation of the chest by the method by D. Nuss, the largest zone of stress concentration was found on the outer posterior surface of the sixth pair of ribs. The most tense vertebrae were ThV– ThVI, but the maximum values did not exceed the permissible values. In the case of a lower plate conduction, the correction is achieved with better SSS values in the higher elements of the «chest – ribs – spine» system.

Author Biographies

Marianna Kaminska, SE «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Helth Ukraine»

MD, PhD

Valerii Degtuar, SE «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Helth Ukraine»

MD, Prof., Department of the Pediatric Surgery, orthopedics and traumatology

References

  1. Razumovsky, A. Yu., Alkhasov, A. B., & Mitupov, Z. B. (2016). 15-year experience in the treatment of funnel chest deformity in children. Pediatric surgery, 20(6), 284–287. DOI: 10.18821/1560-9510-2016-20-6-284-287. [in Russian]
  2. Nuss, D., Obermeyer, R. J., & Kelly, R. E. (2016). Nuss bar procedure: Past, present and future. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 5(5), 422-433. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2016.08.05
  3. Xie, L., Cai, S., Xie, L., Chen, G., & Zhou, H. (2017). Development of a computer-aided design and finite-element analysis combined method for customized Nuss bar in pectus excavatum surgery. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03622-y
  4. Awrejcewicz, J., & Luczak, B. (2007). The finite element model of human rib cage. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 45, P. 25–32.
  5. Schwend, R. M., Schmidt, J. A., Reigrut, J. L., Blakemore, L. C., & Akbarnia, B. A. (2015). Patterns of rib growth in the human child. Spine Deformity, 3(4), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.01.007
  6. Li, Z., Kindig, M. W., Subit, D., & Kent, R. W. (2010). Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction. Medical Engineering & Physics, 32(9), 998-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.06.015
  7. Dworzak, J., Lamecker, H., Von Berg, J., Klinder, T., Lorenz, C., Kainmüller, D., ... & Zachow, S. (2009). 3D reconstruction of the human rib cage from 2D projection images using a statistical shape model. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 5(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-009-0390-2
  8. Mohr, M., Abrams, E., Engel, C., Long, W. B., & Bottlang, M. (2007). Geometry of human ribs pertinent to orthopedic chest-wall reconstruction. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(6), 1310-1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.017
  9. Awrejcewicz, J., & Luczak, B. (2006). Dynamics of human thorax with Lorenz pectus bar. XXII symposium «Vibrations in physical systems». Poznan-Bеdlewo
  10. Yoganandan, N., Kumaresan, S., Voo, L., Pintar, F., & Larson, S. (1996). Finite element modeling of the C4–C6 cervical spine unit. Medical Engineering & Physics, 18(7), 569-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(96)00013-6
  11. Knets, I. V., Pfafrod, G. O., & Saulgozis, Yu. J. (1980). Deformation and destruction of solid biological tissues. Riga: Zinatne. [in Russian]
  12. Berezovsky, V. A., & Kolotilov, N. N. (1990). Biophysical characteristics of human tissues. Reference. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. [in Russian]
  13. Nagasao, T., Miyamoto, J., Tamaki, T., Ichihara, K., Jiang, H., Taguchi, T., Yozu, R., & Nakajima, T. (2007). Stress distribution on the thorax after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum results in different patterns between adult and child patients. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 134(6), 1502-1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.013
  14. Alyamovsky, A. A. (2004). SolidWorks / COSMOSWorks. Engineering analysis by the finite element method. Moscow : DMK Press. [in Russian]
  15. Zienkiewicz, O. C., & Taylor, R. L. (2005). The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. 6th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann

How to Cite

Kaminska, M. ., Degtuar, V. ., & Yaresko, O. . (2023). Mathematical modeling of the chest, its funnel-shaped deformation and thoracoplasty. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (2), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872021217-22

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES