Allograftinf in the case of revision hip arthroplasty at aseptic loosening of the acetabular component

Authors

  • Volodymyr Filipenko
  • Petro Vorontsov
  • Husak Valeriia
  • Arutunan Zorik
  • Kateryna Samoylova
  • Oksana Slota
  • Volodymyr Mezentsev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-5987202045-11

Keywords:

Acetabulum, allograft, revision arthroplasty, aseptic loosening, acetabular component

Abstract

Bone loss and significant acetabular defects remain one of the major problems in revision hip arthroplasty. A promising material for grafting of bone defects can be materials based on allogeneic bone after various types of processing, combining optimal properties for osteoregeneration. Objective. To analyze the results of acetabular reconstruction with bone implants «OMS-A» in the case of revision arthroplasty. Methods. The results of examination and treatment of 57 patients (33 women and 24 men) were analyzed. The patients’ age at the time of hospitalization ranged from 24 to 81 years. Patients were diagnosed on the basis of a combination of clinical ma­nifestations of the disease, laboratory data, radiography, computed tomography with 3D reconstruction. According to the classification of W. G. Paprosky, the largest group consisted of type I defects — 25 patients (44 %), II — 13 (23 %), III — 19 (33 %). For the reconstruction of the acetabulum, 21 patients (37%) we used fragmented cortical-cancellous pieces (CGP), 28 (49 %) — volumetric bone implants (OCI), 8 (14 %) — a combination of CGP and OCI. All patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty with an anterolateral approach according to Harding. The resulting acetabular defect was tightly filled with an allografts. Results. X-ray and G. A. Gie results were assessed as good in 36 patients (63 %), satisfactory — in 14 (25 %). The manifestations of infection associated with the use of bone implants «OMS-A» have not been determined. The necessity for repeated surgery in order to restore the acetabulum occurred in 7 patients (12 %). Conclusions. Тhe clinical efficiency of bone implants «OMS-A» for the reconstruction of the acetabulum according to the classification of W. G. Paprosky was: with type I defect — 92 %; with type I and type defect — 92.3 %; with type II and type defect — 78.9 %.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Filipenko

MD, Prof. in Traumatology and Orthopаedics

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Petro Vorontsov

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopаedics

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Husak Valeriia

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Arutunan Zorik

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Kateryna Samoylova

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Oksana Slota

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Volodymyr Mezentsev

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopаedics

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

References

Pierannunzii, L., & Zagra, L. (2016). Bone grafts, bone Graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(12), 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.160025

Kovalenko, A. N., Shubnyakov, I. I., Bilyk, S. S., & Tikhilov, R. M. (2017). Modern technologies for the treatment of severe bone defects in the acetabulum: what problems can individual implants solve? Polytrauma, 1, 72-81. [in Russian]

Eitutis, Yu. G., & Lehensky, O. G. (2014). The current state of the problem of revision hip arthroplasty. Medicine of transport of Ukraine, 1, 83-91. [in Ukrainian]

Butscheidt, S., Moritz, M., Gehrke, T., Püschel, K., Amling, M., Hahn, M., & Rolvien, T. (2018). Incorporation and remodeling of structural allografts in acetabular reconstruction. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 100(16), 1406-1415. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01636

Paprosky, W. G., Perona, P. G., & Lawrence, J. M. (1994). Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 9(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x

Gie, G., Linder, L., Ling, R., Simon, J., Slooff, T., & Timperley, A. (1993). Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 75-B(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.75b1.8421012

Chen, H., Wu, C., Huang, T., Shih, H., Wang, J., & Lee, M. S. (2018). Structural and Morselized Allografting combined with a Cementless cup for acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year follow-up. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2364269

Jialiang, T., Li, S., Ruyin, H., & Xiaobin, T. (2014). Cementless total hip arthroplasty with structural allograft for massive acetabular defect in hip revision. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 17(6), 331-334. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1275. 2014.06.006

da Silva, A. F., Antebi, U., Honda, E. K., Rudelli, M., & Guimaraes, R. P. (2019). Comparative study of the osteointegration of irradiated and non-irradiated bone grafts used in patients with revision hip arthroplasty. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 54(4), 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694715

Karpukhin, A. S., Tikhilov, R. M., & Tsybin, A. V. (2018). The use of structural grafts in revision arthroplasty in conditions of significant acetabular osteolysis. Modern problems of science and education, 1, https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.27388. [in Russian]

Shon, W. Y., Santhanam, S. S., & Choi, J. W. (2016). Acetabular reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty. Hip & Pelvis, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2016.28.1.1

Masumoto, Y., Fukunishi, S., Fukui, T., Takeda, Y., Nishio, S., Fujihara, Y., … & Yoshiya, S. (2019). Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices — case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery. Medicine, 98(27), e16090. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000016090

Wirries, N., Skutek, M., Оrgel, M., Budde, S., Derksen, A., Windhagen, H., & Flоrkemeier, T. (2020). Allogenic bone Graft for femoral defect augmentation in hip revision arthroplasty: A case series. Orthopedic Reviews, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8173

Novachenko, N. P., Korzh, A. A., & Talyshinsky, R. R. (1966). Homoplastic replacement of large defects in bones and joints. Orthopedics, traumatology and prosthetics, 4, 10-17. [in Russian]

Korzh, M. O., Vyrva, O. E., Vorontsov, P. M., Khmizov, S. O., Serbin, M. E., Timchenko, D. S., Kuryata, O. P., & Maksimenko, O. M. (2015). Method of manufacturing biomaterial from bone tissue. Ukrainе. Patent 108813. [in Ukrainian]

Zhang, H., Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Guan, J., Ding, H., Wang, Z., & Dong, Q. (2020). Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01670-1

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES