Additional methods for testing the short extensor of the thumb
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872012295-96Keywords:
short extensor of the thumb, testingAbstract
The article describes two additional methods for testing the short radial extensor muscle of wrist, which were used in 25 volunteers on 50 hands. The first additional method was positive on 45 hands (22 right ones and 23 left ones), negative on 3 right hands and faint on 2 left hands. The second additional method was positive on 48 hands and negative on 2 hands in one volunteer.References
- Variations of the extensor pollicis brevis tendon and its insertion: a study of 44 cadaveric hands / R. Kulshreshtha, S. Patel, A. P. Arya et al. // J. Hand Surgery. — 2007. — Vol. 32E, № 5. — P. 550–553.
- Матев Ив. Реабилитация при повреждениях руки / Ив. Матев, Ст. Банков: пер. с болг. — София: Мед. и физк., 1981. — 256 с.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Sergey Goloborodko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).
