CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF TUNNEL POSITIONING IN ACL RECONSTRUCTION: A RETROSPECTIVE MRI ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872025243-51Keywords:
Аnterior cruciate ligament (ACL), MRI, bone tunnels, graftAbstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common knee injuries requiring surgical intervention. The increasing number of revision surgeries indicates the potential presence of technical errors during primary reconstruction, emphasizing the importance of outcome analysis and careful surgical planning. MRI remains the gold standard not only for diagnosing ACL injuries and associated lesions, but also for evaluating postoperative changes. Objective. To assess MRI-based measurements of femoral and tibial tunnel inclination and entry point location as potential technical causes of ACL graft failure. Methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 105 knee MRI scans from patients following primary ACL reconstruction. The parameters evaluated included femoral and tibial tunnel inclination angles on coronal views, femoral tunnel entry point using a modified Bernhard and Hertel method, and tibial tunnel entry point assessed via he Amis and Jacob line. Results. A femoral tunnel angle within the 30°–50° range was found in 63 % of cases, with the optimal range of 32°– 39° observed in 21 %. In 16 % of cases, the angle exceeded 50°, and in 3 % it was less than 17°. The femoral tunnel entry point fell within the normal range in 46 % of cases, while in 42 cases it was located outside the defined measurement rectangle. Tibial tunnel position on sagittal projection was anatomically correct in 38 % of cases, anteriorly displaced in 21 %, and posteriorly displaced in 41 %. The optimal tibial tunnel inclination angle (≥ 65°) was found in 61 % of cases. Graft integrity was preserved in 24 % of cases with posterior tibial tunnel positioning, and in only 6 % with anterior placement. Conclusions. Technical errors in tunnel formation are a common cause of ACL graft failure. Accurate determination of the tunnel entry point is the most critical factor, while tunnel angle plays a secondary, yet diagnostically valuable, role. These findings highlight the need for meticulous planning, including the use of MRI and intraoperative navigation techniques to optimize tunnel placement.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oleksandr Kostrub, Petro Didukh, Iryna Nikiforova, Ivan Zasadnyuk, Roman Blonskyi, Volodymyr Podik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).
