Model of primary pivots’ prioritization in startups

Authors

  • Olga Andriivna Kozina
  • Nataliia Kostiantunivna Stratiienko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2017.28.14

Keywords:

primary pivots, hypothesis, startup, priority, experiment

Abstract

Importance and useful of primary pivots prioritization is grounded. It is shown that the selection of pivots is part of the experiment to confirm or disprove the primary hypotheses about the effect of the selected parameters on the development of the project. An analytical review of the methods for primary hypotheses formulating is carried out. The disadvantages of some methods of pivots prioritizing are analyzed. The necessity of separate preparation of hypotheses having qualitative and quantitative estimations of stakeholders is considered. A model-scheme of distinguish primary pivots on a set of static and dynamic ones is developed. Possibility to change the method of prioritizing pivots in next phases of the life cycle of a startup is accented.

References

Tyson L. The Ultimate Startup Metrics Guide: 5 KPIs That VCs Recommend / L. Tyson // Geckoboard. – 4 October 2016. – Available at: https://www.geckoboard.com/blog/ultimate-startupmetrics-guide-5-kpis-vcs-recommend/#.WUaWFriPNf9. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Tunguz T. Your Startup’s 10 Most Important Metrics Recommend / T. Tunguz // Tomasz Tunguz. – 26 March 2013. – Available at: http://tomtunguz.com/your-startups-10-most-important-metrics/. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Kozina O. A., Stratienko N. K. Model' upravlenija IT-startapami [Model of IT-startups Management]. Visnyk NTU "KhPI". Ser.: Stratehichne upravlinnya, upravlinnya portfelyamy, prohramamy ta proektamy [Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management]. Kharkov, NTU "KhPI" Publ., 2017, no. 2, pp. 64–71.

Baltussen R., Mikkelsen E., Tromp, N. Balancing efficiency, equity and feasibility of HIV treatment in South Africa – development of programmatic guidance / R. Baltussen, E. Mikkelsen, N. Tromp // BioMedCentral. – 9 October 2013. –Available at: https://resourceallocation.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1478-7547-11-26. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Sauro J. 7 Techniques for Prioritizing Customer Requirements / J. Sauro // MeasuringU. – 9 September 2014. – Available at: https://measuringu.com/prioritize-requirements/. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Crowe J. Billion-Dollar Pivots: Key Lessons Behind 3 Incredible Success Stories / J. Crowe // Openview. – 11 March 2015. – Available at: http://labs.openviewpartners.com/3-successful-startuppivot-examples/ #.WUw9kLiPNf-. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Cowan A. Your Lean Startup / A. Cowan // Cowan+. – Available at: http://www.alexandercowan.com/creating-a-lean-startup-styleassumption-set/#02_Focusing_Testable_Hypotheses. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Kaushik A. You Are What You Measure, So Choose Your KPIs (Incentives) Wisely! / A. Kaushik // Occam’s Razor by Avinash Kaushik. – 23 April 2012. – Available at: https://www.kaushik.net/avinash/measure-choose-smarter-kpisincentives/. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Baltussen R., Niessen L. Priority Setting of Health Interventions: The Need for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis / R. Baltussen, L. Niessen // NCBI. – 21 August 2006. – Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1560167/#. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Vigers K. Razrabotka trebovanij k programmnomu obespecheniju [Software Requirements]. Moscow, Russkaja redakcija Publ., 2004. 576p.

Adams J., Bateman B., Becker F. Effectiveness and acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of vaccinations in preschool children: systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment / J. Adams, B. Bateman, F. Becker // NCBI. – Health Technol Assess, 19 November 2015. – Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562004. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Lessing E. How to do a MoSCoW Analysis and prioritize requirements effectively in a complex environment? / E. Lessing // Business analysis excellence. – 30 March 2015. – Available at: http://business-analysis-excellence.com/how-to-do-a-moscowanalysis/. (accessed 20.06.2017)

van de Poel I. Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development / I. van de Poel // Research in Engineering Design. – 30 May 2007. – Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00163-007-0029- 7#aboutcontent. (accessed 20.06.2017)

Downloads

How to Cite

Kozina, O. A., & Stratiienko, N. K. (2017). Model of primary pivots’ prioritization in startups. Bulletin of National Technical University "KhPI". Series: System Analysis, Control and Information Technologies, (28), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2017.28.14

Issue

No. 28 (2017)

Section

SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DECISION-MAKING THEORY

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Системний аналiз, управління та iнформацiйнi технологiї

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).