Estimation of the primary stability of the press-fit and screwed-in acetabular components after hip joint arthroplasty


  • Oleg Loskutov
  • Nadiia Naumenko
  • Oleksandr Loskutov
  • Dmytro Syniehubov
  • Dmytro Gorobets
  • Kseniya Furmanova



hip joint, arthroplasty, acetabular component, finite element method, stress-strain state


Arthroplasty is one of the most common and effective treat­ments for degenerative diseases and injuries of the hip joint, but marked increase in the number of revision procedures asso­ciated with instability of the implant, including cups, and a pair of friction problems.

Objective: using biomechanical methods to evaluate the primary acetabular stability with screwing up and press-fit components.

Methods: to evaluate the stress-strain state and subchondral spongy tissues in the acetabular zone under load of 1000 H, developed a simplified design scheme of the hip joint and healthy model of «bone – cup – insert – head» implant using finite element method. Press-fit and that screwing up cups were studied.

Results: in healthy hip joint any stress concentrators are absent. Maximum values are 0.09 MPa stress-strain state on the strength of spongy bone tissue 12.17 MPa. The most strenous share of subchondral bone is part of the roof — 16.24 MPa for her strength of 150–200 MPa. If using press-fit cups revealed increasing tension of spongy tissue in 4 ÷ 5 times, and at the entrance to the subchondral acetabular zone — 2 ÷ 3 times. With the use of screw up cups t transferring the load on the pelvic bone closest to the healthy joint. Small lo­cal stress concentrators in the spongy tissue occur in the contact zone of the threaded subchondral and spongy tissue and at a dis­tance of 1mm their value is reduced by 2–3 times and does not exceed 0.3 MPa.

Conclusions: the use of screw up cup has ad­vantages, especially in osteoporosis, because after implantation load on the pelvic bone close to the stress-strain state of healthy hip joint.


Horst P, Sproul RC, Bozic KJ. The economics of total hip and knee arthroplasty. Techniques in revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Ed. By R. Scuderi. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2015, рр. 2–5.

Ahtiyamov IF. Kuzmin II. Oshibki i oslozhneniya endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava (Errors and complications of hip arthroplasty). Kazan: Tsentr operativnoy pechati, 2006. 328 p. (in Russian)

Zagorodniy NV. Endoprotezirovaniye tazobedrennogo sustava. Osnovi i praktika: rukovodstvo (Endoprosthetics of the hip joint. Fundamentals and Practice: A Guide). Moskow: GEOTAR. Media, 2011. 704 p. (in Russian)

Prokhorenko VM. Pervichnoe i revizionnoye endoprotezirovaniye tazobedrennogo sustava (Primary and revision arthroplasty of the hip joint). Novosibirsk: ANO «Klinika NIITO», 2007. 348 p. (in Russian)

Sulyma OM. Reviiyne endoprotezuvannia pry aseptychniy nestabilnosti acetabuliarnoho komponenta endoproteza ta defektah kul’shovoi zapadyny (Revision endoprosthetics with aseptic instability of the acetabular component of the endoprosthesis and defects in the vertical cavity): abstract dissertation of the PhD in Traumatology and Prosthetics. Kyiv, 2011. 26 p. (in Ukrainian)

Loskutov AE. Endoprotezirovaniye tazobedrennogo sustava: monographiya (The Hip Arthroplasty). Dnepropetrovsk: Lira, 2010. 344 p. (in Russian)

Filippenko VA, Korzh NA. Endoprotezirovaniye tazobedrennogo sustava (The Hip Arthroplasty). Kharkiv: Kollegium, 2015. 219 p. (in Russian)

Gunther KP, Al-Dabouby F, Bernstein P. How to do a cementless hip arthroplasty. Eur Instructional Lectures. 2009;9:189–202. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00966-2_19.

Li H, Mao Y, Oni JK, Dai K, Zhu Z. Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip with more than 30 % lateral uncoverage of uncemented acetabular components. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:1178–83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31398.

Vasu R, Carter J, Harris WH. Stress distributions in the acetabular region-1 before and after total joint replacement. J Biomechanics. 1982;15(3):155–64.




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>