Еpidemiology of proximal femur fractures in ukraine: results of two retrospective studies

Authors

  • Vladyslav Povorozniuk
  • Natalya Grigoryeva
  • Mykola Korzh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-3104
  • Sergey Strafun
  • John Kanis
  • Eugene McCloskey
  • Volodimir Vaida
  • Fedir Klymovytsky
  • Roman Vlasenko
  • Victor Forosenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872016468-74

Keywords:

proximal femur fractures, osteoporosis, osteoporotic fracture, age, sex, frequency

Abstract

Systemic osteoporosis and its complications is an important medical and social problem due to the great costs for treat­ment and rehabilitation of patients. The incidence of fractures of the proximal femur (FPF) is one of the most serious osteopo­rotic fractures, gradually increases due to the aging of the popu­lation, has sexual features, but similar epidemiological studies in Ukraine are limited. This article presents the results of ret­rospective analym nsis of two Ukrainian studies of incidence of FPF in the population aged 40 years and older — Vinnitsa city Study and STOP Study (System of Registration of Osteopo­rotic fractures in Ukrainian Population) which were conducted in 1997–2002 and 2011–2012 respectively. It was established that FPF incidence increases with age in both men and women. In addition, the incidence of FPF was higher in men under 65 yearsthan those in women, with a predominance of women in older age groups. The incidence of FPF was similar to that of some neighboring countries (Romania and Poland). In con­clusion, as FPF is an important health, social and economic problem for society, which has become very important in recent­years.The results of national epidemiological studies are neces­saryfor the development of integrated strategies for their treat­ment.

References

  1. World Health Organization Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level [Online]. WHO, Geneva, 2007. vailable from: www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en/index.html.
  2. Kanis JA, Borgström F, Compston J, Dreinhöfer K, Nolte E, Jonsson L, Lems WF, McCloskey EV, Rizzoli R, Stenmark J. SCOPE: a scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:144. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0144-1.
  3. Povoroznyuk VV. Diseases of musculoskeletal system in people of all different (selected lectures, reviews, articles): In 3 vols. Kyiv, 2009. 664 p. (in Ukrainian)
  4. Povorozniuk VV Grygorieva NV, Orlyk TV, et al. Osteoporosis in practice of internist physician. K., 2014. 198 p. (in Russian)
  5. Strom O, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA, Compston J, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B. Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch. Osteoporos. 2011;6:59-155. doi: 10.1007/s11657-011-0060-1.
  6. Kanis JA, Ode’n A, Mc Closkey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C; IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Sep;23(9):2239-56. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3.
  7. Cooper C, Cole Z, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, Melton LJ, Cummings SR, Kanis JA; IOF CSA Working Group on Fracture Epidemiology. Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1277-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6.
  8. Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2006;367(9527):2010–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68891-0.
  9. Filipov O. Epidemiology and social burden of the femoral neck fractures. J IMAB Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers) 2014;20(4):516–8. doi: 10.5272/jimab.2014204.516.
  10. Dhanwal DK, Cooper C, Dennison EM. Geographic variation in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence: the growing importance of asian Influences in coming decades. J Osteoporosis. 2010;2010:757102. doi: 10.4061/2010/757102.
  11. Ballane G, Cauley JA, Luckey MM, Fuleihan Gel-H. Secular trends in hip fractures worldwide: opposing trends east versus west. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(8):1745–55. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2218.
  12. Dhanwal DK, Dennison EM, Harvey NC, Cooper C. Epidemiology of hip fracture: worldwide geographic variation. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(1):15–22. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.73656.
  13. Harvey NC, Curtis E, Velde van der R, Moon RJ, van den Bergh JP, Geusens P, de Vries F, van Staa TP, Cooper C. On epidemiology of fractures and variation with age and ethnicity. Bone. 2016;93:230–1. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.07.011.
  14. Povoroznyuk VV, Forosenko VS. Epidemiology of osteoporotic hip fracture. Problems of osteology. 2004;7(3/4):14-22. (in Ukrainian)
  15. Povoroznyuk VV, Klymovytskyy FV, Dzerovych NI. Age-related features of bone mineral density of the femur in women of Donetsk region. Trauma. 2013;14(1):65-9. (in Russian)
  16. Povoroznyuk VV, Vajda VM, Dzerovych NI. Age and gender-rate of hip fractures in the population of Transcarpathian region. Problems of aging and longevity. 2011;20(1):99-104. (in Ukrainian)
  17. Povoroznyuk VV, Grygoryeva NV, Korzh MO, et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture in Ukraine: results of the study STOP (registration system of osteoporotic fractures). Trauma. 2016;3 (submitted for publication)
  18. Povoroznyuk VV, Grygorieva NV, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in Ukraine: results of two retrospective studies. Osteoporosis Int. (submitted for publication).
  19. Povoroznyuk VV, Grygorieva NV, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H. Ukrainian version of FRAX — from the creation to validity. Pain. Joints. Spine. 2016;(3). Available from: http://www.mif-ua.com/archive/article/43935. (in Ukrainian)
  20. Lesnyak O, Ershova O, Belova K, Gladkova E, Sinitsina O, Ganert O, Romanova M, Khodirev V, Johansson H, McCloskey E, Kanis JA. Epidemiology of fracture in the Russian Federation and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos. 2012;7:67–73. doi: 10.1007/s11657-012-0082-3.
  21. Badurski JE, Kanis JA, Johansson H, Dobreńko A, Nowak NA, Daniluk S, Jezienicka E. The application of FRAX® to determine intervention thresholds in osteoporosis treatment in Poland. Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2011;121(5):148–55.
  22. Badurski JE, Kanis JA, Johansson H, Dobreńko A, Nowak NA, Daniluk S, Jezienicka E. Incidence of Hip Fracture in Romania and the Development of a Romanian FRAX Model. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;92(5):429–36. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9697-7.
  23. Population Estimates and Projections [Online]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/population-projection-tables.

Downloads

How to Cite

Povorozniuk, V., Grigoryeva, N., Korzh, M., Strafun, S., Kanis, J., McCloskey, E., Vaida, V., Klymovytsky, F., Vlasenko, R., & Forosenko, V. (2017). Еpidemiology of proximal femur fractures in ukraine: results of two retrospective studies. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (4), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872016468-74

Issue

No. 4 (2016)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Vladyslav Povorozniuk, Natalya Grigoryeva, Mykola Korzh, Sergey Strafun, John Kanis, Eugene McCloskey, Volodimir Vaida, Fedir Klymovytsky, Roman Vlasenko, Victor Forosenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).