Features of radiological and anatomical changes in bone of the hip joint due to injuries

Authors

  • Volodymyr Filipenko
  • Ruslan Zlatnyk
  • Stanislav Bondarenko
  • Mandus Akonjom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872015355-60

Keywords:

кульшовий суглоб, наслідки травм, рентгеноанатомічні зміни, ендопротезування

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a retrospective analysis of radiographs and CT scans for studying of typical changes in acetabulum (A) and proximal femur (F) in patients with the consequences of injuries in the area of the hip joint.

Methods: We analyzed radiographs and CT scans in 106 patients. Patients were divided into groups: I — false joint of F neck, II – false joint at the level of per-, inter- and subtrochanteric area of F, III — post-traumatic avascular necrosis of F head, IV — posttraumatic coxarthrosis, V — inveterate fracture dislocation. We performed an assessment of condition of the joint space and endplates, F head shape, peculiarities of A, continuity of the pelvic ring, condition of the neck and the proximal F, gap width in pseudarthrosis, defects of greater and lesser thochanters, migra­tion of proximal F up, the presence of metal construction (MK), its stability, and resorption of bone tissue around it. Status of bone structures we evaluated according to Singh and Barnett-Nordin indices.

Results: There were determined distinctive changes in the hip joint in each group: I — lysis of the F neck (dominated by full one in 38 % patients), displacement of the proximal F (67 %), MK (40 %), its migration into the joint cavity (14 %), perforation of the A walls (12 %), and osteoporosis (91 %); II — lysis of the F neck in 43 % patients (in 29 % complete one), defects in greater (71 %) and lesser (86 %) trochanters, dislocation of the proximal F and osteoporosis in 100 %, MK (29 %); III — deformation of the F neck (100 %), defects of the A walls (36 %), displacement of the proximal F (82 %), MK (36 %) and osteoporosis (100 %); IV — deformation of the A wall with its defects (80 %), displacement of the proxi­mal F (86 %), MK (31 %) and osteoporosis (91 %); V — defects of the A wall (100 %), violation of pelvic ring integrity (70 %), displacement of the proximal F (40 %), stable MC (20 %), and osteoporosis (100 %).

Conclusion: Considering results obtained after arthroplasty in patients with sequelae of injuries in the hip joint it is possible to optimize preoperative planning and to improve treatment.

References

  1. The structure of primary hip replacement nowadays / G. V. Gayko, L. P. Kukuruza, R. A. Kozak [et al.]: Coll. Science. XVI Congress works orthopedic trauma Ukraine. — Kharkiv, 2013. — P. 74.
  2. Primary arthroplasty on a previously operated hip / N. A. Korzh, V. Filippenko, V. A. Tankut [et al.] // News morskoї medicine. — 2011. — № 2. — S. 196–197.
  3. Salvage of failed hip fracture fixation / M. Angelini, M. D. McKee, J. P. Waddell [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2009. — Vol. 23 (6). — P. 471–478, doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181acfc8c.
  4. Kezlya O. P. Two-stage surgical treatment of patients with deforming coxarthrosis / O. P. Kezlya // Medicine-cal news. — 2005. — № 5. — S. 77–79.
  5. The use of nanostructured oxide coatings when performing hip hemiarthroplasty / D. V. Ivchenko, A. Samoilenko, A. I. Shvets [et al.]: ST. Sciences. Prace XVI z'їzdu ortopedіv-travmatologіv Ukraine. — Kharkiv, 2013. — P. 84–86.
  6. Zhang B. Hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures / B. Zhang, K. Y. Shiu, M. Wang // J. Arthroplasty. — 2004. — Vol. 19 (3). — P. 329–333.
  7. Hip arthroplasty after intramedullary hip screw fixation: a perioperative evaluation / J. J. Exaltacion, S. J. Incavo, V. Mathews [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2012. — Vol. 26 (3). — P. 141–147, doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318221ea6b.
  8. Oliynyk O. E. Hip joint deformities and defects in the proximal femoral bone and acetabular: Author. Thesis. ... Dr. med. Sciences: 14.01.21 / O. E. Oliynyk. — Kharkiv, 2011. — 36 p.
  9. Selection of a cementless acetabular component in total hip replacement in patients with osteoporosis / A. E. Loskutov, Degtar D. A., Sinegubov A. V. Altanets: ST. Sciences. Prace XVI z'їzdu ortopedіv-travmatologіv Ukraine. — Kharkiv, 2013. — S. 89.
  10. Filippenko V. A. Periprosthetic remodelling features of the femural zones depends on the type of fixation and hip joint / V. A. Filipenko, A. Pidhayska: Coll. Science. XVI Congress works orthopedic trauma Ukraine. — Kharkiv, 2013. — P. 95–96.
  11. Total hip replacements done without cement after acetabular fractures: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study / M. H. Huo, B. D. Solberg, L. E. Zatorski, K. J. Keggi // J. Arthroplasty. — 1999. — Vol. 14 (7). — P. 827–831.
  12. Talmo C. T. Treatment of intertrochanteric nonunion of the proximal femur using the S-ROM prosthesis / C. T. Talmo, J. V. Bono // Orthopedics. — 2008. — Vol. 31 (2). — P. 125.
  13. Hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures / A. Enocson, L. Mattisson, C. Ottosson, L. J. Lapidus // Acta Orthopaedica. — 2012. — Vol. 83 (5). — P. 493–498, doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.688724.
  14. Haidukewych G. J. Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures / G. J. Haidukewych, D. J. Berry // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. — 2003. — Vol. 85 (5). — P. 899–904.
  15. Gee M. Hip arthroplasty in proximal femoral fracture / M. Gee, R. R. Thakur // Total Hip Arthroplasty. — JP Medical Ltd, 2012. — Chapter 30. — P. 449–458.
  16. Rathod P. A. Total hip arthroplasty in proximal femoral deformity / P. A. Rathod, A. J. Deshmukh, J. A. Rodriguez // Total Hip Arthroplasty. — JP Medical Ltd, 2012. — Chapter 30. — P. 501–514.
  17. Salvage of failed trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures using a distally fixed, modular, uncemented hip revision stem / R. J. Weiss, J. Karrholm, N. P. Hailer [et al.] // Acta Orthopaedica. — 2012. — Vol. 83 (5). — P. 488–492, doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733917.
  18. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture nonunion / T. M. Mabry, B. Prpa, G. J. Haidukewych [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. — 2004. — Vol. 86-A (10). — P. 2263–2267.
  19. Total hip arthroplasty after prior surgical treatment of hip fracture: is it always challenging? / S. M. Mortazavi, M. R. Greenky, O. Bican [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. — 2012. — Vol. 27 (1). — P. 31–36, doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.05.014.
  20. Osteoporosis: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, prevention, treatment / [N. A. Korzh, V. Povoroznyuk, Dedukh N. V., Zupanets I. A.]. — Kharkov: Golden stranitsy, 2002. — 646 p.
  21. Povoroznyuk V. V. Age aspects of structural-functional state of the bone-regional population of Ukraine / V. Povoroznyuk // Osteoporosis and osteopathy. — 2000. — № 1. — S. 15–22.
  22. Riggs B. L. Osteoporosis. Etiology, diagnosis, treatment / B. L. Riggs, Sh L. D. Mellon. — M-SPb .: JSC "Publishing House of the Bean," "Nevsky Dialect", 2000. — 560 p.
  23. Singh M. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis / M. Singh, A. R. Nagrath, P. S. Maini // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. — 1970. — Vol. 52-A. — P. 457–467.
  24. Koot V. C. M. Evalution of the Singh index for measuring osteoporosis / V. C. M. Koot // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. — 1996. — Vol. 78-B. — P. 831–834.
  25. Sharmazanova O. The role of peripheral index of Barnett hour to study the structural and functional condition of the bones in children and adolescents/ AP Sharmazanova // Ukrainian medical almanac. — 2002. — № 2. — P. 199–201.
  26. Barnett E. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach / E. Barnett, B. E. C. Nordin // Clin. Radiol. — 1960. — Vol. 11. — P. 166–174.
  27. Dequeker J. Quantitative radiology: radiogrammetry of cortical bone/ J. Dequeker // Br. J. Radiol. — 1976. — Vol. 49. — P. 912–920.
  28. Lane I. M. Osteoporosis: diagnosis and treatment / I. M. Lane, E. H. Riley, P. Z. Wirganowich // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. — 1996. — V.78-A. — P. 618–632.

Downloads

How to Cite

Filipenko, V., Zlatnyk, R., Bondarenko, S., & Akonjom, M. (2015). Features of radiological and anatomical changes in bone of the hip joint due to injuries. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872015355-60

Issue

No. 3 (2015)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Volodymyr Filipenko, Ruslan Zlatnyk, Stanislav Bondarenko, M. Akonjom

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).