META-ANALYSIS OF RAVITCH AND NUSS PROCEDURES FOR THE TREATMENT OF FUNNEL-SHAPED CHEST DEFORMITY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Authors

  • Olena Karpinska Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Anatolii Levytskyi Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Vlasii Pylypko Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024170-78

Keywords:

Funnel-shaped chest deformity, complications, plate displacement, meta-analysis

Abstract

Funnel-shaped chest deformity is the most common anomaly of the chest wall development, occurring in 8 out of every 1 000 children. The defect is noticeable at birth in approximately 86 % of patients with chest deformity. Objective. To conduct a systematic review comparing the treatment of funnel-shaped chest deformity in children and young people under 20 years of age by surgical methods according to Ravitch and Nuss by the number of complications that occur in the short (up to 30 days) and long-term periods (2–3 years). Methods. A search of scientometric databases revealed 1 734 sources, of which 8 papers were selected for further analysis. Results. We evaluated systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing methods
of treatment of lumbar deformity in children and adolescents. It was determined that there are currently no randomized trials comparing these procedures in children and adolescents. A comparative analysis of the risk of complications in the surgical treatment of the funnel-shaped sternum in children and young adults using the Ravitch and Nuss methods determined that there is no difference in the overall incidence of complications between the Nuss and Ravitch procedures when considering the pediatric population in terms of overall, early, and late complications. With the development of the Nuss technology, complications associated with plate mixing are practically non-existent, and the development of new methods of controlling
operations, anesthesia and further patient management has reduced the development of both postoperative and long-term complications. Conclusions. According to the results of the meta-analysis of the risk of early and late complications, it is impossible to definitively determine the advantage of any surgical method for the correction of lumbar deformity of the chest. The number of Nuss surgeries has been increasing over the years, which means that the minimally invasive approach is the method of choice for patients and surgeons, although questions remain about achieving structural stability and
the method of Nuss correction in severe deformities. The lack of definitive conclusions is more related to the methodological problems of the analyzed data, including a limited number of observations and a large age difference in the observation groups, the lack of a standard for presenting data to describe the patient's condition (magnitude and type of deformity, primary complications of the cardiac and respiratory systems, the presence of complicating factors).

Author Biography

Anatolii Levytskyi, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv. Ukraine

MD, Prof. in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

References

  1. Ravitch, M. M. (1949). The operative treatment of pectus excavatum. Annals of Surgery, 129(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-194904000-00002
  2. Nuss, D., Kelly, R. E., Croitoru, D. P., & Katz, M. E. (1998). A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 33(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90314-1
  3. Sollie, Z. W., Gleason, F., Donahue, J. M., & Wei, B. (2022). Evolution of technique and results after permanent open repair for pectus deformities. JTCVS Techniques, 12, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.12.008
  4. Antonoff, M. B., Erickson, A. E., Hess, D. J., Acton, R. D., & Saltzman, D. A. (2009). When patients choose: comparison of Nuss, Ravitch, and Leonard procedures for primary repair of pectus excavatum. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 44(6), 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.017
  5. Johnson, W. R., Fedor, D., & Singhal, S. (2014). Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-25
  6. Malek, M. H., Berger, D. E., Housh, T. J., Marelich, W. D., Coburn, J. W., & Beck, T. W. (2006). Cardiovascular Function Following Surgical Repair of Pectus Excavatum. Chest, 130(2), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.130.2.506
  7. Malek, M. H., Berger, D. E., Marelich, W. D., Coburn, J. W., Beck, T. W., & Housh, T. J. (2006). Pulmonary function following surgical repair of pectus excavatum: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 30(4), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.004
  8. Chen, Z., Amos, E. B., Luo, H., Su, C., Zhong, B., Zou, J., & Lei, Y. (2012). Comparative pulmonary functional recovery after Nuss and Ravitch procedures for pectus excavatum repair: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-7-101
  9. Walsh, J., Walsh, R., & Redmond, K. (2023). Systematic review of physiological and psychological outcomes of surgery for
  10. pectus excavatum supporting commissioning of service in the UK. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 10(1), e001665.
  11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001665
  12. de Oliveira Carvalho, P. E., da Silva, M. V. M., Rodrigues, O. R., & Cataneo, A. J. M. (2014). Surgical interventions for treating pectus excavatum. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd008889.pub2
  13. de Souza Coelho, M., Silva, R. F. K. C., Bergonse Neto, N., de Souza Stori, W., dos Santos, A. F. R., Mendes, R. G., & de Matos Fernandes, L. (2009). Pectus Excavatum Surgery: Sternochondroplasty Versus Nuss Procedure. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 88(6), 1773–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.051
  14. Kelly, R. E., Shamberger, R. C., Mellins, R. B., Mitchell, K. K., Lawson, M. L., Oldham, K., Azizkhan, R. G., Hebra, A. V., Nuss, D., Goretsky, M. J., Sharp, R. J., Holcomb, G. W., Shim, W. K. T., Megison, S. M., Moss, R. L., Fecteau, A. H., Colombani, P. M., Bagley, T. C., & Moskowitz, A. B. (2007). Prospective Multicenter Study of Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum: Design, Perioperative Complications, Pain, and
  15. Baseline Pulmonary Function Facilitated by Internet-Based Data Collection. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 205(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.027
  16. Zheng-xia, P. A. N., Chun, W. U., Ling, H. E., Hong-bo, L. I., & Li, Y. G. (2009). Pectus excavatum: Nuss procedure vs modified Ravitch procedure. Acta Academie Medicinae Militaris Tertiae., 31(14), 1378–1380.
  17. Jayaramakrishnan, K., Wotton, R., Bradley, A., & Naidu, B. (2013). Does repair of pectus excavatum improve cardiopulmonary function? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 16(6), 865–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt045
  18. Nasr, A., Fecteau, A., & Wales, P. W. (2010). Comparison of the Nuss and the Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum repair: a meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 45(5), 880–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.012
  19. Kanagaratnam, A., Phan, S., Tchantchaleishvilli, V., & Phan, K. (2016). Ravitch versus Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum:
  20. systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 5(5), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2016.08.06
  21. Mao, Y. Z., Tang, S., & Li, S. (2017). Comparison of the Nuss versus Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum repair:
  22. an updated meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 52(10), 1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.028
  23. Molik, K. A., Engum, S. A., Rescorla, F. J., West, K. W., Scherer, L. R., & Grosfeld, J. L. (2001). Pectus excavatum repair: Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 36(2), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.20707
  24. Jo, W. M., Choi, Y. H., Sohn, Y.-S., Kim, H. J., Hwang, J. J., & Cho, S. J. (2003). Surgical Treatment for Pectus Excavatum. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 18(3), 360. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2003.18.3.360
  25. Kelly, R. E., Mellins, R. B., Shamberger, R. C., Mitchell, K. K., Lawson, M. L., Oldham, K. T., Azizkhan, R. G., Hebra, A. V., Nuss, D., Goretsky, M. J., Sharp, R. J., Holcomb, G. W., Shim, W. K. T., Megison, S. M., Moss, R. L., Fecteau, A. H., Colombani, P. M., Cooper, D., Bagley, T., ... Paulson, J. F. (2013). Multicenter Study of Pectus Excavatum, Final Report: Complications, Static/Exercise Pulmonary Function, and Anatomic Outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 217(6), 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.06.019
  26. Lam, M. W. C., Klassen, A. F., Montgomery, C. J., LeBlanc, J. G., & Skarsgard, E. D. (2008). Quality-of-life outcomes after surgical correction of pectus excavatum: a comparison of the Ravitch and Nuss procedures. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 43(5), 819–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.020
  27. Boia, E. S., Popoiu, M. C., David, V. L., Nicodin, A., Cozma, G., Adam, O., Trailesc, M., Kovacs, T., Milassin, T., & Tornyos, S. (2010). Comparative analysis of modified ravitch and minimal invasive nuss procedures for the correction of pectus excavatum in children. Jurnalul pediatrului, 13(13), 49–50.
  28. Kang, C. H., Park, S., Park, I. K., Kim, Y. T., & Kim, J. H. (2012). Long-term Surveillance Comparing Satisfactionbetween the Early Experience of Nuss Procedure vs. Ravitch Procedure. The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 45(5), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.308
  29. Papic, J. C., Finnell, S. M. E., Howenstein, A. M., Breckler, F., & Leys, C. M. (2014). Postoperative opioid analgesic use after Nuss
  30. versus Ravitch pectus excavatum repair. Journal ofPediatric Surgery, 49(6), 919–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.025
  31. Tikka, T., Kalkat, M. S., Bishay, E., Steyn, R. S., Rajesh, P. B., & Naidu, B. (2016). A 20-year review of pectus surgery: an analysis of factors predictive of recurrence and outcomes. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 23(6), 908–913. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw263
  32. Purrman, K. C., Ziazadeh, D., Loria, A., & Jones, C. (2021). Pectus Bar Displacement Causing Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 112(4): e267–e270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.10.059

Downloads

How to Cite

Karpinska, O. ., Levytskyi, A. ., & Pylypko, V. . (2024). META-ANALYSIS OF RAVITCH AND NUSS PROCEDURES FOR THE TREATMENT OF FUNNEL-SHAPED CHEST DEFORMITY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024170-78

Issue

No. 1 (2024)

Section

DIGESTS AND REVIEWS

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).