MULTICENTRIC OSTEOSARCOMA AS A RARE TYPE OF OSTEOSARCOMA (CASE REPORT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720234103-108Keywords:
Multicentric osteosarcoma, metachronous type, bone lesionAbstract
Multicentric osteosarcoma (M-OGS) is classified as a special type of osteosarcoma, which is characterized by multicentric bone lesions without visceral organs involvement in the tumor process. Synchronous type of the lesion is noted when several foci of osteosarcoma are diagnosed at the same time, whereas metachronous type may develop additional foci 6 months after the primary tumor diagnosis. This type of osteosarcoma is very rare with only a few articles describing this pathology. Objective. Present a clinical case of rare pathology — multicentric osteosarcoma. Materials and methods. Clinical, radiological, pathomorphological data of a patient with multicentric osteosarcoma. Data on the results of treatment of the patient. Results. Multicentric osteosarcoma It accounts for about 1.5 % of all cases reported worldwide. Fuchs et al described a multifactorial etiology of this pathology, considering it a part of hereditary diseases, such as Rothmund-Thomson, Li-Fraumani, Bloom syndromes. Patients with Pagetʼs disease or McCuneAlbright syndrome have also been diagnosed with multicentric M-OGS. Tumor genetic predisposition has been described as one of the etiology factors, where a genetic mutation is detected. While studying the nature of multicentric M-OGS, various scientists have created classifications of this lesion. Taking to account all clinical and radiological data, a differential diagnosis comes to multiple metastatic lesions of carcinoma, chronic recurrent osteomyelitis and hyperphosphatasia. Conclusions. Multicentric osteosarcoma is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor that has a characteristic clinical presentation in the form of multiple bone lesions without visceral organs involvement. Mandatory patient monitoring after a comprehensive treatment allows to detect a spread of tumor process, as well as verify this rare pathology and choose the best treatment course.
References
- Silverman, G. (1936) Multiple osteogenic sarcoma. Arch Pathol., 21, 88–95.
- Corradi, D., Wenger, D. E., Bertoni, F., Bacchini, P., Bosio, S., Goldoni, M., Unni, K. K., Sim, F. H., & Inwards, C. Y. (2011). Multicentric Osteosarcoma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 136 (5), 799–807. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp0v0oatkcnazp
- Agrawal, M., Patil, A., James, T., Kumar, N., & Premalata, C. S. (2020). Multifocal Osteosarcoma: Multiple Primaries or Metastases? A Report of Rare Case and Review of Literature. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports, 10 (8), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i08.1878
- Fuchs, B., & Pritchard, D. J. (2002). Etiology of Osteosarcoma. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 397, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200204000-00007
- Iavarone, A., Matthay, K. K., Steinkirchner, T. M., Israel, M. A. (1992). Germ-line and somatic p53 gene mutations in multifocal osteogenic sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 89 (9), 4207–4209.
- Hansen, M. F., Nellissery, M. J., & Bhatia, P. (1999). Common mechanisms of osteosarcoma and paget's disease. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 14 (S2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650140209
- Hameed, S., Vijayan, S., Naik, M., & Rao, S. (2012). Multicentric osteosarcoma. Singapore Med. J., 53 (10), e214–217.
- Bacci, G., Fabbri, N., Balladelli, A., Forni, C., Palmerini, E., & Picci, P. (2006). Treatment and prognosis for synchronous multifocal osteosarcoma in 42 patients. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 88-B(8), 1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b8.17809
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).