PUNCTURE LASER MICRODISCECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF SEQUESTERED HERNIATION OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872023431-35Keywords:
Lumbar intervertebral discs, sequestered hernias, puncture laser microdiscectomyAbstract
Objective. to improve the results of treatment of sequestered herniation of lumbar intervertebral discs by the puncture laser microdiscectomy (PLM) method. Methods. During the period from 2000 to 2023, 132 patients with sequestered lumbar disc herniations were operated on by the PLM method. There were 88 males and 34 females. The age of the patients was from 23 to 64 (42.3 ± 3.5) years. Surgeries were performed using a C-arc operating fluoroscope. The laser pulse duration — 0.3–0.5 sec, and radiation exposure — 500–600 J. Approach to the sequestrum was mainly posteromedian transdural. For laterally located sequestra, posterolateral approach was used. The efficacy of PLM was assessed by pain intensity reduction according to the VAS scale one month after surgery, and according to the McNab scale 3 months after surgery. Results. One month after PLM, the maximum reduction of radicular pain intensity was noted in patients with posteromedian hernias, to a lesser extent — with paramedian hernias, and the least pronounced — with lateral hernias. However, no statistically significant differences in pain intensity one month after surgery depending on hernia location were found (p > 0.05). As for the intensity of lumbar pain, in all groups, regardless of hernia location, it significantly decreased and did not exceed 1 point after one month. 3 months after surgery, 95 (71.9 %) patients had an excellent result according to the McNab scale, 13 (9.8 %) — good, 7 (5.3 %) — satisfactory, 17 (12.8 %) — unsatisfactory, indicating that the PLM method of sequestered hernias can be quite effective in a certain selection of patients. According to our data, positive results can reach 81.8 % (95 % CI 74.2–87.9 %) (CI — confidence interval). Conclusions Sequestered hernias, which can be operated by the PLM method, should not exceed 9 mm in height on axial sections, should have a smooth rounded lenticular shape without signs of migration. The positive effect of PLM of sequestered hernias reached 81.7 %. The results were better with PLM of posteromedian hernias.
References
- Asher, W. P., Holzer, P., & Claici, G. (1988). Denaturation and vaporization of the nucleus pulposus of herniated intervertebral discs (Eds.). In: Abstract Book of International Symposium on Percutanneous Lumbar Discectomy (pp. 12–13).
- Casper, G. D., Hartman, V. L., & Mullins, L. L. (1996). Results of a clinical trial of the holmium: YAG laser in disc decompression utilizing a side-firing fiber: A two-year follow-up. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 19 (1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1996)19:1%3C90::aid-lsm10%3E3.0.co;2-f
- Choy, D. S. J. (2004). Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression: A 17-Year Experience. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 22 (5), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2004.22.407
- Hellinger, J. (1994). Nonendoscopic percutaneous 1064-Nd: YAG laser decompression: mechanism, technique and experience. In: 3rd Symposium on laser-assisted endoscopic intervention ind orthopaedics (pр. 6). Zurich.
- Khizhnyak, M. V., Makeyeva, T. I., Tanaseychuk, A. F., & Tolstikhin,A. V. (1998). Puncture laser discectomy for multiple discopathies in the lumbosacral spine. Bulletin of the Ukrainian Association of Neurosurgeons, 6, 108. Retrieved from https://neuro.kiev.ua/wp–content/uploads/1998_006_Bul_UAN.pdf (in russian)
- Khizhnyak, M. V., & Pedachenko, Y. E. (2009). Puncture laser microdiscectomy. Kyiv: Raevsky's Publishing House. (in russian)
- Budrovac, D., Radoš, I., Tot, O. K., Haršanji Drenjančević, I., & Omrčen, I. (2020). Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain. SEEMEDJ, 4 (2), 62–68.
- Momenzadeh, S., Koosha, A., Kazempoor Monfared, M., Bairami, J., Zali, A., Ommi, D., Hosseini, B., Hashemi, M., Sayadi, S., Aryani, R., Nematollahi, F., Nematollahi, L., & Barati, M. (2019). The Effect of Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression on Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 10 (1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2019.04
- Sang-Ho Lee S.-H., Chung, S.-E., Ahn, Y., Kim, T.-H., Park, J.-Y., & Shin, S.-W. (2006). Comparative radiologic evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open microdiscectomy: a matched cohort analysis. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 73 (5), 795–801.
- Patel, N., & Singh, V. (2018). Percutaneous Lumbar Laser Discectomy: Literature Review and a Retrospective Analysis of 65 Cases. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 36 (10), 518–521. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.4460
- Erbas, Y. C., Pusat, S., & Erdogan, E. (2015). Percutaneous laser disc decompression: retrospective analysis of 197 cases and review of the literature. Turkish Neurosurgery, 25 (5). https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.14692-15.2
- Hashemi, M., Falsafi, M., Razzaghi, M. R., Dadkhah, P., Taheri, M., Delshad, M. H., & Zali, A. (2020). The Long-term Effects of Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression (PLDD) Treatment on Lumbar Disc Protrusion: A 2-Year Follow-up. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 11 (4), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.67
- Menchetti, P. P. M., Canero, G., & Bini, W. (2010). Percutaneous Laser Discectomy: Experience and Long Term Follow-Up. Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves (р. 117–121). Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_18
- Zorin, M., Kirpa, Y., & Sabadash, V. (2000). Punction laser vaporization of intrevertabrate disk sequesters. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (1), 65–67. Retrieved from https://theunj.org/article/view/51443 (in Ukrainian)
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).