X-RAY ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICIENCY OF HYBRID STABLE-ELASTIC FIXATION UNSTABLE ANKLE FRACTURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872023219-24Keywords:
X-ray assessment, hybrid stable-elastic fixation, unstable ankle fracture, tibiofibular syndesmosisAbstract
The level of complications after treatment of patients with bone fractures stays high 22–60 %. Understanding ankle-foot joint biomechanics is critical for choosing trendy methods hybrid fixation or the traditional fixation of the fibula plate and positional screw for distal syndesmosis. Objective. To analyze the effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with unstable trans- and suprasyndesmosis fractures with hybrid stable-elastic fixation (HSEF) in comparison with the traditional method of fixation with a bone plate with a positioning screw according to X-ray morphometric parameters. Methods. 82 patients with unstable trans- and suprasyndesmotic fractures of the fibula. The main (I group) of the study consisted of 18 (21,95 %) patients with an average age of (41,6 ± 15,5) years who operated with hybrid stable-elastic fixation, and the control (II group) — 64 (78.05 %) patients with an average age of (52,4 ± 15,7) years, who operated with a bone plate with a positioning screw. Results. The TTA was 0.63 times lower than in patients after traditional fixation. For type C fractures in patients after HSEF, the value of TTA was also 0.78 times (p = 0.0005). Conclusions. The analysis of X-ray morphometric parameters of the angle of inclination of the talus bone and the talus-tibia angle confirms the advantage of hybrid stable-elastic fixation in trans- or supra-syndesmotic fractures of the fibula with damage to the distal inter-tibial syndesmosis. According to the value of the index of the angle of inclination of the talus in patients after hybrid stable-elastic fixation, lower risks of ankle-foot joint instability in the p/o period were found than in patients after traditional osteosynthesis. Median values of the talus-tibia angle indicated a tendency to shorten the fibula in patients after traditional osteosynthesis.
References
- Gan, K., Zhou, K., Hu, K., Lu, L., Gu, S., & Shen, Y. (2019). Dynamic fixation versus static fixation for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries: a meta-analysis. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 25, 1314–1322. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.913324
- Scheer, R. C., Newman, J. M., Zhou, J. J., Oommen, A. J., Naziri, Q., Shah, N. V., … Uribe, J. A. (2020). Ankle fracture epidemiology in the united states: patient-related trends and mechanisms of injury. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 59(3), 479–483. ttps://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.016
- Liu, C. L., Li, Y. P., Wang, X. Q., & Zhang, Z. J. (2018). Quantifying the stiffness of achilles tendon: intra- and inter-operator reliability and the effect of ankle joint motion. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 24, 4876–4881. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909531
- Rammelt, S., & Obruba, P. (2015). An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries. European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 41(6), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0466-8
- van den Bekerom, M. P., Kerkhoffs, G. M., McCollum, G. A., Calder, J. D., & van Dijk, C. N. (2013). Management of acute lateral ankle ligament injury in the athlete. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 21(6), 1390–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2252-7
- Yu, G. S., Lin, Y. B., Xiong, G. S., Xu, H. B., & Liu, Y. Y. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review. International orthopaedics, 43(11), 2539–2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04396-w
- Cammas, C., Ancion, A., Detrembleur, C., Tribak, K., Putineanu, D., & Cornu, O. (2020). Frequency and risk factors of complications after surgical treatment of ankle fractures : a retrospective study of 433 patients. Acta orthopaedica Belgica, 86(3), 563–574.
- Nilsson, G. M., Jonsson, K., Ekdahl, C. S., & Eneroth, M. (2005). Unsatisfactory outcome following surgical intervention of ankle fractures. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 11(1), 11–16.doi:10.1016/j.fas.2004.10.004
- Ovaska, M. (2015). Complications in ankle fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica, 86(sup358), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.1002273
- Pogliacomi, F., De Filippo, M., Casalini, D., Longhi, A., Tacci, F., Perotta, R., Pagnini, F., Tocco, S., & Ceccarelli, F. (2021). Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts. World Journal Of Orthopedics, 12(5), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.270
- Herrera-Pérez, M., González-Martín, D., Vallejo-Márquez, M., Godoy-Santos, A. L., Valderrabano, V., & Tejero, S. (2021). Ankle osteoarthritis aetiology. Journal of clinical medicine, 10(19), 4489. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194489
- Futamura, K., Baba, T., Mogami, A., Morohashi, I., Kanda, A., Obayashi, O., Sato, K., Ueda, Y., Kurata, Y., Tsuji, H., & Kaneko, K. (2017). Malreduction of syndesmosis injury associated with malleolar ankle fracture can be avoided using Weber's three indexes in the mortise view. Injury, 48(4), 954–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.004
- Egol, K. A., Tejwani, N. C., Walsh, M. G., Capla, E. L., & Koval, K. J. (2006). Predictors of short-term functional outcome following ankle fracture surgery. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 88(5), 974–979. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00343
- Larsen, P., Rathleff, M. S., & Elsoe, R. (2019). Surgical versus conservative treatment for ankle fractures in adults — A systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 25(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.009
- Dawe, E. J., Shafafy, R., Quayle, J., Gougoulias, N., Wee, A., & Sakellariou, A. (2015). The effect of different methods of stability assessment on fixation rate and complications in supination external rotation (SER) 2/4 ankle fractures. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 21(2), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2014.09.010
- Chun, Cho, Min, Park, Kim, Kim, & Won. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy of radiologic methods for ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(7), 968. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070968
- Miyamoto, W., & Takao, M. (2011). Management of chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. World journal of orthopedics, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v2.i1.1
- Tornetta, P., 3rd, Axelrad, T. W., Sibai, T. A., & Creevy, W. R. (2012). Treatment of the stress positive ligamentous SE4 ankle fracture: incidence of syndesmotic injury and clinical decision making. Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 26(11), 659–661. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825cf39c
- Wu, K., Lin, J., Huang, J., & Wang, Q. (2018). Evaluation of transsyndesmotic fixation and primary deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures with suspected combined deltoid ligament injury. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 57(4), 694–700. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.12.007
- Laflamme, M., Belzile, E. L., Bedard, L., van den Bekerom, M. P., Glazebrook, M., & Pelet, S. (2015). A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 29(5), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000245
- Naqvi, G. A., Cunningham, P., Lynch, B., Galvin, R., & Awan, N. (2012). Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. The American journal of sports medicine, 40(12), 2828–2835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512461480
- Seyhan, M., Donmez, F., Mahirogullari, M., Cakmak, S., Mutlu, S., & Guler, O. (2015). Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures. Injury, 46 Suppl 2, S19–S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.027
- Liu, G. T., Ryan, E., Gustafson, E., VanPelt, M. D., Raspovic, K. M., Lalli, T., Wukich, D. K., Xi, Y., & Chhabra. (2018). Three-dimensional computed tomographic characterization of normal anatomic morphology and variations of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 57(6), 1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.05.013
- McCormack, Daniel & Solan, Matthew & Aziz, Sheweidin & Faroug, Radwane & Kirmani, Sayyied & Wright, Georgina & Mangwani, Jitendra. (2022). Role of the posterior deep deltoid ligament in ankle fracture stability: A biomechanical cadaver study. World Journal of Orthopedics. 13. 969‒977. http://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i11.969
- Williams, B. T., James, E. W., Jisa, K. A., Haytmanek, C. T., LaPrade, R. F., & Clanton, T. O. (2015). Radiographic identification of the primary structures of the ankle syndesmosis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 24(4), 1187–1199. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3743-0
- Han, S. H., Lee, J. W., Kim, S., Suh, J. S., & Choi, Y. R. (2007). Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot & ankle international, 28(3), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0336
- Harper, M. C., & Keller, T. S. (1989). A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot & ankle, 10(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078901000308
- Park, Y. H., Yoon, M. A., Choi, W. S., Choi, G. W., Hong, S. J., & Kim, H. J. (2018). The predictive value of MRI in the syndesmotic instability of ankle fracture. Skeletal radiology, 47(4), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2821-4
- Błasiak, A., Sadlik, B., & Brzoska, R. (2013). Injuries of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis. Polish orthopedics and traumatology, 78, 139–150.
- Rammelt, S., Zwipp, H., & Grass, R. (2008). Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot and ankle clinics, 13(4), 611–viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2008.08.001
- Wu, Y., He, Q. F., Lai, L. P., Li, X., & Zhou, J. L. (2018). Functional outcome of pronation-external rotation-weber c ankle fractures with supracollicular medial alleolar fracture treated with or without syndesmotic screws: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Chinese medical journal, 131(21), 2551–2557. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.244112
- Kulazhenko, E. V., & Varzar, S. A. (2011). Dynamic fixator for restoration of tibial syndesmosis (experimental-clinical study). Ukrainskyy medechnyy almanakh, 14(1), 131-134.
- Golovakha, M. L., Kozhemyaka, M. A., & Maslennikov, S. O. (2016). Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of ankle fractures with the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Zaporozhye medical journal, 6(99), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2016.6.85529
- Carter, T. H., Wallace, R., Mackenzie, S. A., Oliver, W. M., Duckworth, A. D., & White, T. O. (2020). The fibular intramedullary nail versus locking plate and lag screw fixation in the management of unstable elderly ankle fractures: a cadaveric biomechanical comparison. Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 34(11), e401–e406. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001814
- Okoro, T., Teoh, K. H., & Tanaka, H. (2021). Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model. World journal of orthopedics, 12(8), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i8.548
- Milto, A. J., Negri, C. E., Baker, J., & Thuppal, S. (2023). The statistical fragility of foot and ankle surgery randomized controlled trials. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 62(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.08.014
- Pettrone, F. A., Gail, M., Pee, D., Fitzpatrick, T., & Van Herpe, L. B. (1983). Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 65(5), 667–677.
- Xu, Y., Kang, R., Li, M., Li, Z., Ma, T., Ren, C., Wang, Q., Lu, Y., Zhang, K. (2022). The clinical efficacy of suture-button fixation and trans-syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of ankle fracture combined with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a retrospective study. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 61(1), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009
- Klitzman, R., Zhao, H., Zhang, L. Q., Strohmeyer, G., & Vora, A. (2010). Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot & ankle international, 31(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0069
- Sulima, V., & Chuzhak, A. (2019). [The method of combined stable-elastic fixation of unstable injuries of the ankl joint with transsyndesmotic fractures of the fibula]. Patent UA № 134463. https://base.uipv.org/searchINV/search.php?action=search
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).