Role of definition of clonogenic activity of stromal bone marrow stem cells in patients with aseptic necrosis of the femoral head

Authors

  • Lesya Panchenko
  • Oleksandr Nirshberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872014355-61

Keywords:

avascular necrosis, stem cells, clonogenic activity

Abstract

A problem of choice of medical tactic for patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) is extremely topical. It is very important to focus ones main efforts on either organ salvage surgical interventions or on improvement of a technique for total hip replacement. Largely as a solution to this problem designation of regenerative potential of bone tissue by culturing fibroblast colony-forming units (CFU-F) can help. Objective: To obtain data for the development of a differentiated approach to the treatment strategy by examining the clonogenic activity of stem bone marrow stromal cells in patients with ANFH. Methods: As a material for this study were samples of cancellous bone of the femoral head in 26 patients with ANFH at different stages of the disease. There were grown 36 cultures of stromal fibroblasts. We have estimated such parameters as total number of nucleated cells, the number of stem stromal cells - colony-forming units of fibroblast in the bone marrow of 1 cm3 and the effectiveness of their cloning among 105 nucleated cells. Results: It was found that as the disease progresses the ability to stem bone marrow stromal cells to ensure the reduction reactions in bone tissue loose quite rapidly. According to the results of the research the most significant negative effect on the proliferation and differentiation of stem bone marrow stromal cells of the proximal femur in patients with ANFH are such factors as alcohol abuse and exposure to toxic compounds. Conclusions: ANFH is one of the most critical diseases of the hip joint pathology in terms of oppression of the potential ability of bone remodeling and restoration. The regenerative potential of bone in patients with ANFH is significantly higher in the early stages of the disease.

References

  1. Astakhov V. S. Osteogenic cells precursors in human bone marrow. — Kiev: Phoenix, 2000. — 176 p.
  2. Gayko G. V. Characterization of dysplastic coxarthrosis form flow for klonohennoyu activity of stem cells in bone marrow stromal / G. V. Gayko, L. M. Panchenko, О. V. Kalashnikov // "Journal of Medical Science of Ukraine." — 2012. — Vol. 18, annex. — P. 31-32.
  3. Gayko G. V. Relationship klonohennoyi activity of stem cells in bone marrow stromal and course of idiopathic arthrosis / G. V. Gayko, L. M. Panchenko, A. V. Kalashnikov // Visnyk orthopedics, traumatology and prosthetics. — 2012. — № 2. — P. 30-33.
  4. Mechanisms of influence of mesenchymal stem cells on reparative osteogenesis / V. G. Klimovitsky, V. M. Oksimets, A. G. Popandopulo [et al.]: collection of scientific works XV Congress of orthopedic trauma Ukraine (Kiev, 16-18 September 2010). — Dnepropetrovsk, 2010. — P. 105.
  5. Nechayev K. A. Study of the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal cells in the bone marrow of animals under the influence of various factors osteogenesis / K. A. Nechaev, O. V. Kokorev // Siberian Journal of Oncology. — 2007. — Annex № 2. — P. 82-83.
  6. Panchenko L. M. Performance osteogenic activity of human bone marrow and their practical use: dis. ... сandidate medical Science / L. M. Panchenko. — Kiev, 1997. — 115 p.
  7. Teplyashin A. S. Prospects for the use of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue in the regulation of regeneration of supporting tissues / A. S. Teplyashin, S. Z. Sharifullina, N. I. Chupikova // Allergology and Immunology. — 2006. — T. 7, № 2. — P. 189-198.
  8. Friedenstein A. Ya. Induction of bone tissue and osteogenic progenitor cells / A. Ya. Friedenstein, K. S. Lalykina. — M .: Medicine, 1973. — 223 p.
  9. Chernilevsky V. Ye. Role of stem cell self-renewal in the organisms and the possibility of extending the life / V. Ye. Chernilevsky // Reports Moscow Society of Naturalists. — 2008. — № 41. — P. 82-95.
  10. Babis G. C. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head / G. C. Babis, V. Sakellariou, J. Parvizi, P. Soucacos // Orthopedics. — 2011. — Vol. 34, № 1. — P. 39–47.
  11. Canalis E. The hormonal and local regulation of bone formation / E. Canalis // Endocr. Rev. — 2003. — Vol. 4 (1). — P. 62–77.
  12. Mödde U. I. Skeletal stem/osteoprogenitor cells: Current concepts, alternate hypotheses, and relationship to the bone remodeling compartment / U. I. Mödde, S. Khosla // Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. — 2008. — Vol. 103, № 2. — Р. 393–400.

Downloads

How to Cite

Panchenko, L., & Nirshberg, O. (2014). Role of definition of clonogenic activity of stromal bone marrow stem cells in patients with aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872014355-61

Issue

No. 3 (2014)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Lesya Panchenko, Oleksandr Nirshberg

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).