Modern possibilities of upper extremity regional anesthesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720223-4110-118Keywords:
Regional anesthesia, peripheral nerves block, complications of regional anesthesiaAbstract
Today, regional anesthesia is widely used during surgical interventions in orthopedic surgery. Blockades of individual nerves and plexuses are used. Objective. To introduce readers: surgeons, orthopedists-traumatologists with the possibilities of regional anesthesia like an adequate method of analgesia during upper limb interventions. Methods. Relevant literature from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar databases and own experience of regional anesthesia were analyzed. The results. The work describes the effect of regional anesthesia on the nervous, respiratory, cardiovascular and coagulation systems. Information about blocks of peripheral nerves of the upper extremities: interscalene, supraclavicular, subclavian, axillary. Their advantages and disadvantages were analyzed. Interscalene block is not recommended for patients with severe lung disease due to the risk of respiratory failure. Complications of this analgesia include: phrenic nerve block (up to 100 %), sympathetic chain block and Horner's syndrome. Also, possible accidental injection into the vertebral artery. Indications for the supraclavicular block are operations on the hand, forearm, elbow and shoulder. Complications — phrenic nerve block (17‒50 %), recurrent laryngeal blockade (22 %), pneumothorax (0.6‒6.1 %). When planning anesthesia, the accompanying pathology of the patient and his general condition should be taken into account. Particular care is required when the patient is taking anticoagulants. Risk of bleeding and thrombosis should be carefully assessed. Special attention should be paid to the toxicity of local anesthetics and ways to eliminate it. Conclusions. Regional anesthesia can be used in the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods. Sometimes it’s the only method that permit surgical intervention. It is necessary to understand all the advantages and limitations to ensure high quality of patient care.
References
- Orthopedic Surgery — Global Trends & Opportunities. Report. Region: Global. Life Science Intelligence, 2018.
- Yentis, S. M., & Vlassakov, K. V. (1999). Vassily von Anrep, Forgotten Pioneer of Regional Anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 90(3), 890–895. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199903000-00033
- Cotter, J. T., Nielsen, K. C., Guller, U., Steele, S. M., Klein, S. M., Greengrass, R. A., & Pietrobon, R. (2004). Increased body mass index and ASA physical status IV are risk factors for block failure in ambulatory surgery — an analysis of 9,342 blocks. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 51(8), 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03018454
- Elkassabany, N. M., Antosh, S., Ahmed, M., Nelson, C., Israelite, C., Badiola, I., Cai, L. F., Williams, R., Hughes, C., Mariano, E. R., & Liu, J. (2016). The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 122(5), 1696–1703. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001237
- Ahdout, J., & Nurok, M. (2016). Anesthesia Patients with Concomitant Cardiac and Hepatic Dysfunction. Anesthesiology Clinics, 34(4), 731–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2016.06.008.
- Horlocker, T. T., Vandermeuelen, E., Kopp, S. L., Gogarten, W., Leffert, L. R., & Benzon, H. T. (2018). Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 43(3), 263–309. https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0000000000000763
- Bruce, B. G., Green, A., Blaine, T. A., & Wesner, L. V. (2012). Brachial Plexus Blocks for Upper Extremity Orthopaedic Surgery. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon, 20(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-20-01-038
- Srikumaran, U., Stein, B. E., Tan, E. W., Freehill, M. T., & Wilckens, J. H. (2013). Upper-Extremity Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Perioperative Pain Management of Orthopaedic Patients. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 95(24), e197-1-13. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.l.01745
- https://ppt-online.org/166291
- Urmey, W. F., Talts, K. H., & Sharrock, N. E. (1991). One Hundred Percent Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis Associated With Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia as Diagnosed by Ultrasonography. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 72(4), 498-503. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014
- Melton, M. S., Monroe, H. E., Qi, W., Lewis, S. L., Nielsen, K. C., & Klein, S. M. (2017). Effect of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block on the Pulmonary Function of Obese Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(1), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002180
- Russon, K., Pickworth, T., & Harrop-Griffiths, W. (2010). Upper limb blocks. Anaesthesia, 65, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06277.x
- Mak, P. H. K., Irwin, M. G., Ooi, C. G. C., & Chow, B. F. M. (2001). Incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its effect on pulmonary function. Anaesthesia, 56(4), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01708-2.x
- Perlas, A., Lobo, G., Lo, N., Brull, R., Chan, V. W. S., & Karkhanis, R. (2009). Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 34(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0b013e31819a3f81
- Desroches, J. (2003). The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observational study of 150 patients. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 50(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03017794
- Neal, J. M., Neal, E. J., & Weinberg, G. L. (2020). American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity checklist: 2020 version. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 46(1), 81–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101986
- Gitman, M., Fettiplace, M. R., Weinberg, G. L., Neal, J. M., & Barrington, M. J. (2019). Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144(3), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005989
- Dickerson, D. M., & Apfelbaum, J. L. (2014). Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 34(7), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x14543102
- Harvey, M., & Cave, G. (2017). Lipid emulsion in local anesthetic toxicity. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 30(5), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000498
- Tran, D. Q., Salinas, F. V., Benzon, H. T., & Neal, J. M. (2019). Lower extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 44(2), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-000019
- Neal, J. M., Hsiung, R. L., Mulroy, M. F., Halpern, B. B., Dragnich, A. D., & Slee, A. E. (2012). ASRA Checklist Improves Trainee Performance During a Simulated Episode of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 37(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0b013e31823d825a
- Yeniocak, T., & Canbolat, N. (2019). Retrospective Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: Effect of Experience of Anesthesiologists on Volume of Local Anesthetic Administered. Pain Research and Management, 2019, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4846956
- Ahsan, Z. S., Carvalho, B., & Yao, J. (2014). Incidence of Failure of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Catheters for Postoperative Analgesia in Upper Extremity Surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 39(2), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.011.
- Salinas, F. (2003). Location, location, location: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks and stimulating catheters. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 28(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1053/rapm.2003.50033
- Jenkins, C. R., & Karmakar, M. K. (2005). An unusual complication of interscalene brachial plexus catheterization: delayed catheter migration. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 95(4), 535–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei217
- Capdevila, X., Dadure, C., Bringuier, S., Bernard, N., Biboulet, P., Gaertner, E., & Macaire, P. (2006). Effect of Patient-controlled Perineural Analgesia on Rehabilitation and Pain after Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery. Anesthesiology, 105(3), 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200609000-00022
- Koscielniak-Nielsen, Z. J. (2008). Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks: What are the benefits? Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 52(6), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01666.x
- Liu, S. S., Zayas, V. M., Gordon, M. A., Beathe, J. C., Maalouf, D. B., Paroli, L., Liguori, G. A., Ortiz, J., Buschiazzo, V., Ngeow, J., Shetty, T., & Ya Deau, J. T. (2009). A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound Versus Nerve Stimulator Guidance for Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Surgery for Postoperative Neurological Symptoms. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 109(1), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a3272c
- Fredrickson, M. J., & Kilfoyle, D. H. (2009). Neurological complication analysis of 1000 ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks for elective orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study. Anaesthesia, 64(8), 836–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05938.x
- Sites, B. D., Taenzer, A. H., Herrick, M. D., Gilloon, C., Antonakakis, J., Richins, J., & Beach, M. L. (2012). Incidence of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity and Postoperative Neurologic Symptoms Associated With 12,668 Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 37(5), 478–482. https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0b013e31825cb3d6
- Auroy, Y., Benhamou, D., Bargues, L., Ecoffey, C., Falissard, B., Mercier, F., Bouaziz, H., & Samii, K. (2002). Major Complications of Regional Anesthesia in France. Anesthesiology, 97(5), 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200211000-00034
- Malchow, R. J., Gupta, R. K., Shi, Y., Shotwell, M. S., Jaeger, L. M., & Bowens, C. (2018). Comprehensive Analysis of 13,897 Consecutive Regional Anesthetics at an Ambulatory Surgery Center. Pain Medicine, 19(2), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx045
- Capdevila, X., Pirat, P., Bringuier, S., Gaertner, E., Singelyn, F., Bernard, N., Choquet, O., Bouaziz, H., & Bonnet, F. (2005). Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Hospital Wards after Orthopedic Surgery. Anesthesiology, 103(5), 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200511000-00018
- Borgeat, A., Blumenthal, S., Lambert, M., Theodorou, P., & Vienne, P. (2006). The Feasibility and Complications of the Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block: A 1001-Case Survey. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 103(1), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000221462.87951.8d
- Kapur, E., Vuckovic, I., Dilberovic, F., Zaciragic, A., Cosovic, E., Divanovic, K. A., Mornjakovic, Z., Babic, M., Borgeat, A., Thys, D. M., & Hadzic, A. (2007). Neurologic and histologic outcome after intraneural injections of lidocaine in canine sciatic nerves. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 51(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01169.x
- Capdevila, X., Bringuier, S., Borgeat, A., & Riou, B. (2009). Infectious Risk of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks. Anesthesiology, 110(1), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e318190bd5b
- Spitzer, D., Wenger, K. J., Neef, V., Divé, I., Schaller-Paule, M. A., Jahnke, K., Kell, C., Foerch, C., & Burger, M. C. (2021). Local Anesthetic-Induced Central Nervous System Toxicity during Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Case Series Study of Three Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(5), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051013
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).