Complex revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic implant instability with 3D-modeling

Authors

  • Diomyd Chabanenko РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Oleksandr Polіvoda РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Grigory Puhkan РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Oleh Vytychak РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872021258-62

Keywords:

Revision arthroplasty, bone defect, 3D-model

Abstract

The increasing number of hip replacement surgeries in the worldwide practice causes the progressive increase in revision cases. The treatment of patients with instability of the hip implants requires the individual approach, taking into account the size of the defect, the loss of bone mass and the structural state of the bone in each case. Objective. To show the technical opportunities of the revision cementless implants in combination with 3D-modeling for the treatment of acetabulum massive defects. Methods. It was shown the cli­nical case of hip replacement surgery of the patient with the aseptic instability of endoprosthesis components. A 3D-model of the pelvis and femur was created on the basis of the СT scan in order to make an analysis of bone tissue defects and to select the exact size of implant components for revision surgery. Results. It was suggested a standardized methodology of the preoperative examination to make the high-tech operation easier and maximally effective. It is necessary not only to take into account the results of the X- ray analysis, but also to pay attention to all changes in the damaged segments. It was shown that the real plastic model make the work of the surgeon easier during all steps of the treatment. The opportunity to use the standard revision components for the restoration of the complex geometrically shaped bone was demonstrated with the good nearest clinical and radiological and functional results. Conclusions. The success of the revision arthroplasty depends on the carefully preoperative planning, the maximum approximation of the parameters of the artificial joint to the anatomical parameters of the patient and biomechanics of the hip join. No less important is the individual recovery program during the postoperative period.

Author Biographies

Diomyd Chabanenko, РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine

DMSci in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Oleksandr Polіvoda, РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine

DMSci in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Grigory Puhkan, РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine

MD

Oleh Vytychak, РЕ «Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital». Ukraine

MD

References

  1. Filippenko, V. A., & Korzh, N. A. (2015). Endoprosthetics of the hip joint. Kharkiv: Collegium. [in Russian]
  2. Evans, J. T., Evans, J. P., Walker, R. W., Blom, A. W., Whitehouse, M. R., & Sayers, A. (2019). How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. The Lancet, 393(10172), 647-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31665-9
  3. Delaunay, C., Hamadouche, M., Girard, J., & Duhamel, A. (2013). What are the causes for failures of primary hip Arthroplasties in France? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 471(12), 3863-3869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5
  4. Paprosky, W. G., Perona, P. G., & Lawrence, J. M. (1994). Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 9(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x
  5. Reid, C., Grobler, G. P., & Dower, B. J. (2012). Revision total hip arthroplasty: Addressing acetabular bone loss. SA Orthopaedic Journal, 11(3), 34–46
  6. Kosyakov, A. N. (2016). Essays on surgery of the hip joint. 2nd ed. Kiev. [in Russian]
  7. Gaiko, G. V., Torchinsky, V. P. & Sulima, O. M. (2014). Errors and complications of revision prosthetics in patients with aseptic instability of the acetabular component of the hip arthroplasty. Trauma, 15(1). [in Ukrainian]
  8. Korzh, M. O., Filipenko, V. A., & Tankut, V. O. (2017). Modern tendencies of using friction pairs in human joint endoprostheses (review of literature and own researches). Journal of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 23(3–4), 247–255
  9. Massin, P., & Achour, S. (2017). Wear products of total hip arthroplasty: The case of polyethylene. Morphologie, 101(332), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2016.06.001
  10. Broomfield, J. A., Malak, T. T., Thomas, G. E., Palmer, A. J., Taylor, A., & Glyn-Jones, S. (2017). The relationship between polyethylene wear and Periprosthetic Osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty at 12 years in a randomized controlled trial cohort. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(4), 1186-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.037
  11. Revell, P. A. (2008). The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 5(28), 1263-1278. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0142
  12. Marsh, A. C., Chamorro, N. P., & Chatzistavrou, X. (2019). Long-term performance and failure of orthopedic devices. Bone Repair Biomaterials, 379-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102451-5.00015-9
  13. Rukin, Y., Kavalerskiy, G., Murylev, V., Elizarov, P., Lychagin, A., & Tselisheva, E. (2018). Three-dimensional models in planning of revision hip arthroplasty with complex acetabular defects. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 52(6), 625. https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.ijortho_556_16

How to Cite

Chabanenko, D. ., Polіvoda O. ., Puhkan, G. ., & Vytychak, O. . (2023). Complex revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic implant instability with 3D-modeling. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872021258-62

Issue

Section

SHORT REPORTS AND NEWS FROM PRACTICE