Combined replacement of defect in the complex treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the distal tibia

Authors

  • Oleg Vyrva Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0597-4472
  • Yanina Golovina Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-9109
  • Roman Malyk Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-4834
  • Iryna Bets Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872020393-98

Keywords:

postresection bone defect, bone tumor, fascia-cutanoeus flap, bone allograft

Abstract

Replacement of large bones and soft tissues defects formed after radical removal of the tumor remains a topical issue in oncological orthopedics. Today the combined methods of large segmental defects replacing of bones and joints are distraction osteogenesis with bone autograft and APC (allograft prosthesis composite). The combination of techniques allows us to minimize the disadvantages and to use the advantages of each method. Many methods of primary soft tissue grafting are used to replace soft tissue defects depending on localization and spread of the tumor process. The problem of soft tissue reconstruction and restoration the function of joints and limbs is relevant. Objective: to present a clinical case of malignant tumor treatment of the distal tibia part with an integrated approach to the restoration of bone defects and soft tissues. Methods: a clinical case of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the distal tibia T2N0M0, stage II, clinical group II was described. The patient underwent replacement of the postresection defect of the distal tibia with an osteoarticular allograft and fascia-cutanoeus flap grafting in order to replace soft tissue defect in the lower third of the leg. Results: using osteoarticular allograft replacing technique reduced the risk of complications as opposed using bone allograft or prosthetic replacement separately. The application of massive complex soft tissue graft made it possible to obtain a positive surgical outcome of treatment in patients with malignant tumors of long bones. Conclusions: an integrated approach to the replacement of post-resection defects in long bones and soft tissues helps to preserve the patient's limb in case of malignant bone tumor. Key

Author Biographies

Oleg Vyrva, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

MD, Prof. in Traumatology and Orthopаedics

Yanina Golovina, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Roman Malyk, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Iryna Bets, Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

References

  1. Mumford, J. E., & Simpson, A. H. (1992). Management of bone defects: a review of available techniques. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, 12, 42–49
  2. Lee, S. H., Ahn, Y. J., Chung, S. J., Kim, B. K., & Hwang, J. H. (2009). The use of allograft prosthesis composite for extensive proximal femoral bone deficiencies. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 24(8), 1241-1248. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.006
  3. Mayle Jr, R. E., & Paprosky, W. G. (2012). Massive bone loss. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 94-B(11_Supple_A), 61-64. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.94b11.30791
  4. Temple, H. T., Kuklo, T. R., Lehman, R. A. Jr. Heekin, R. D,, & Berrey, B. H. (2000). Segmental limb reconstruction after tumor resection. American Journal of Orthopedics, 29(7), 524–529
  5. Ruggieri, P., Mavrogenis, A. F., Guerra, G., & Mercuri, M. (2011). Preliminary results after reconstruction of BONY defects of the proximal humerus with an allograft-resurfacing composite. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 93-B(8), 1098-1103. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.93b8.26011
  6. Wang, Z., Guo, Z., Li, J., Li, X., & Sang, H. (2010). Functional outcomes and complications of reconstruction of the proximal humerus after intra-articular tumor resection. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2(1), 19-26. doi:10.1111/j.1757-7861.2009.00058.x
  7. Ruggieri, P., Bosco, G., Pala, E., Errani, C., & Mercuri, M. (2010). Local recurrence, survival and function after total femur resection and Megaprosthetic reconstruction for bone sarcomas. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 468(11), 2860-2866. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1476-4
  8. Tan, P. K., & Tan, M. H. (2009). Functional outcome study of mega-endoprosthetic reconstruction in limbs with bone tumour surgery. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 38(3), 192–196
  9. Gilbert, N. F., Yasko, A. W., Oates, S. D., Lewis, V. O., Cannon, C. P., & Lin, P. P. (2009). Allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the tibia. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 91(7), 1646-1656. doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.01542
  10. Donati, D., Colangeli, M., Colangeli, S., Di Bella, C., & Mercuri, M. (2008). Allograft-prosthetic composite in the proximal tibia after bone tumor resection. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(2), 459-465. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0055-9
  11. Refaat, Y., Gunnoe, J., Hornicek, F. J., & Mankin, H. J. (2002). Comparison of quality of life after amputation or limb salvage. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (397), 298-305. doi:10.1097/00003086-200204000-00034
  12. Mittermayer, F., Windhager, R., Dominkus, M., Krepler, P., Schwameis, E., Sluga, M., … & Strasser, G. (2002). Revision of the Kotz type of tumour endoprosthesis for the lower limb. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 84-B(3), 401-406. DOI: 10.1302/0301- 620x. 84b3.12204
  13. Viola, D. C., Cardozo Filho, N. S., Nunes, R. T., Godoy, F. A., Petrilli, M. D., Korukian, M., & Jesus-Garcia, R. (2009). Use of antibiotic spacers for knee endoprosthesis infections treatment. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 17(3), 144-148. doi:10.1590/s1413-78522009000300003
  14. Donati, D., & Biscaglia, R. (1998). The use of antibiotic-impregnated cement in infected reconstructions after resection for bone tumours. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 80-B(6), 1045-1050. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.80b6.0801045
  15. Gharedaghi, M., Peivandi, M. T., Mazloomi, M., Shoorin, H. R., Hasani, M., Seyf, P., & Khazaee, F. (2016). Evaluation of clinical results and complications of structural allograft reconstruction after bone tumor surgery. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 4(3), 236–242
  16. Pluhar, G. E., Manley, P. A., Heiner, J. P., Vanderby, R., & Markel, M. D. (2007). Gluteal muscle attachment during proximal femoral reconstruction in a canine model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 25(2), 208-220. doi:10.1002/jor.20283
  17. Chim, H., Tan, B., Tan, M. H., Tan, K., & Song, C. (2007). Optimizing the use of local muscle flaps for knee Megaprosthesis coverage. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 59(4), 398-403. doi:10.1097/01.sap.0000258955.27987.17
  18. Vyrva, O. E., Golovina, Ya. A., & Malyk, R. V. (2015). Allocomposite arthroplasty in the surgical treatment of patients with Malignant tumors of long bones (literature review). Orthopedics, Traumatology, prosthetics, 2, 120–125. doi:10.15674/0030-598720152120-125. [in Russian]
  19. Vyrva, O. E. (2013). Modular individual endoprosthesis in the treatment of patients with malignant tumors of the bones of the extremities: dissertation of Doctor in Medical Sciences. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]

Downloads

How to Cite

Vyrva, O., Golovina, Y., Malyk, R., & Bets, I. (2023). Combined replacement of defect in the complex treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the distal tibia. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872020393-98

Issue

No. 3 (2020)

Section

SHORT REPORTS AND NEWS FROM PRACTICE

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Oleg Vyrva, Yanina Golovina, Roman Malyk, Iryna Bets

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).