Osteoporosis and osteoarthrosis: pathogenetically interrelated diseases? (Review of literature)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720134102-110

Keywords:

оsteoarthritis, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, subchondral bone

Abstract

Data about a relationship between osteoporosis (by the index of bone mineral density, BMD) and osteoarthrosis are presented on the basis of an analysis of scientific literature. The majority of the analysed works revealed an inverse relation between these diseases, i.e., patients with gonarthrosis and coxarthrosis demonstrated high BMD values in the regions of their lumbar spine and proximal femur. Patients with spondyloarthrosis and osteoarthrosis of small joints of hand occasionally developed a relation of the above pathology with higher BMD. Many authors point out that, despite higher BMD values in osteoarthrosis, the risk of fractures significantly exceeds the population risk. There is no doubt that the above fact necessitates taking of measures for prevention of osteoporotic fractures in patients with the “normal” and even “increased” BMD, rather than with the reduced one only. Assessing the “subchondral bone – osteosrthrosis” relationship, the authors have analysed four clinical situations, which combine these diseases. The problem of investigation of common pathogenetic mechanisms in the development of osteoarthrosis and BMD requires further studies with regard for biological, molecular and biomechanical factors, which produce their effect on the relationship between the subchondral bone and articular cartilage. The disclosure of the mechanisms of relationship between osteoarthrosis and osteoporosis, the revealing of high risk groups, the use of modern diagnostic methods and purposeful prophylaxis of fractures will contribute to improving the quality of life in patients of older age groups.

References

  1. Dequeker J. Inverse relationship osteoarthritis-osteoporosis: what is the evidence? What are the consequences? / J. Dequeker // Br. J. Rheumatol. — 1996. — Vol. 35. — P. 813–820.
  2. Nasonov E. L. Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis: conflicting or complementary disease? / E. L. Nasonov // Consilium medicum. — 2000. — T. 2, № 6. — Р. 248–252.
  3. Pelletier J.-P. Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis: similarities and differences in experimental models / J.-P. Pelletier // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S71.
  4. Romanov G. N. Modern problems of age-related diseases: osteoarthritis and osteoporosis / G. N. Romanov, E. V. Rudenko // Medytsynskye novosti. — 2012. — № 8. — Р. 26–29.
  5. Valdes A. M. Human genetics of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis / A. M. Valdes // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — P. S70.
  6. Martel-Pelletier J. Molecular and cellular studies (osteoporosis and osteoarthritis similarities and differences) / J. Martel-Pelletier // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S70.
  7. Bouxsein M. L. Biomechanics of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis: similarities and differences / M. L. Bouxsein // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S71.
  8. Cortet B. Assessment of pain in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: similarities and differences / B. Cortet // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S71.
  9. Bellamy N. Similarities and differences in the assessment of function in osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA) / N. Bellamy // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S72.
  10. Adachi J. D. Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis: similarities and differences / J. D. Adachi // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S73.
  11. Genant H. K. Conventional radiography in assessment of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in clinical research / H. K. Genant // Osteoporosis Int. — 2013. — Vol. 24, Supp. 1. — Р. S74.
  12. The association between hip fracture and hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study / J. Franklin, M. Englund, T. Ingvarsson, S. Lohmander // BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. — 2010. — Vol. 26, № 11. — Р. 274–285.
  13. Benevolenskaya L. I. General principles of prevention and treatment of osteoporosis / L. I. Benevolenskaya // Consilium Medicum. — 2000. — Vol. 2, № 6. — С. 240–244.
  14. Toroptsova N. V. osteoporosis problem in the modern world [Electronic resource] / N. V. Toroptsova, E. E. Mikhailov, L. I. Benevolenskaya. — Mode of access to document.: http://www.rmj.ru/articles_4058.htm.
  15. Povoroznyuk V. V. Menopause and musculoskeletal system / V. V. Povoroznyuk, N. V. Grigorieva. — K.: Expres, 2004. — 512 с.
  16. Osteoporosis: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, prevention and treatment / N. A. Korzh, V. V. Povoroznyuk, N. V. Dedukh et al. — Kharkov: Golden Pages, 2002. — 648 p.
  17. Johnell O. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures / О. Johnell, J. Kanis // Osteoporosis Int. — 2005. — № 16. — Р. 3–7.
  18. Kanis J. A. The incidence of hip fracture in Europe / J. A. Kanis // Osteoporosis Int. — 1993. — № 3, Suppl 1. — P. 10–15.
  19. Sambrook Ph. Osteoporosis / Ph. Sambrook, C. Cooper // Lancet. — 2006. — Vol. 367. — P. 2010–2018.
  20. Lesnyak O. M. Audit of the problem of osteoporosis in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 / O. M. Lesnyak // Internetional Osteoporosis Fundation. — 2011. — 68 p.
  21. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review / D. Pereira, B. Peleteiro, J. Araújo et al. // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. — 2011. — Vol. 19, № 11. — P. 1270–1285.
  22. Tanna S. Osteoarthritis «Opportunities to Address Pharmaceutical Gaps» [Электронный ресурс] / S. Tanna. — 2004. — Режим доступа к докум.: http://archives.who.int/prioritymeds/report/background/osteoarthritis.doc.
  23. Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study / M. A. Davis, W. H. Ettinger, J. M. Neuhaus, K. P. Mallon // J. Rheumatol. — 1991. — Vol. 18. — P. 591–598.
  24. Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly: the Framingham study / Y. Zhang, J. Niu, M. Kelly-Hayes et al. // Am. J. Epidemiol. — 2002. — Vol. 156. — P. 1021–1027.
  25. Kovalenko V. N. Osteoarthritis. How / V. N. Kovalenko, O. P. Bortkiewicz. — K.: Morіon, 2003. — 448 р.
  26. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer study. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Duth population with that in 10 other populations / J. L. C. M. Van Saase, L. K. J. Van Romunde, A. Cats et al. // Ann. Rheum. Dis. — 1989. — Vol. 4. — P. 271–280.
  27. Neustadt D. H. Intra-articular injections for osteoarthritis of the knee / D. H. Neustadt // Cleve Clin. J. Med. — 2006. — Vol. 73, № 10. — P. 897–911.
  28. Povoroznyuk V. V. Zahvoryuvannya kіstkovo-m'yazovoї system in the people rіznogo vіku / V. V. Povoroznyuk. — Kyiv, 2009. — T. 3. — 664 р.
  29. A meta-analysis of sex difference prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis / V. K. Srikanth, J. L. Fryer, G. Zhai et al. // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. — 2005. — Vol. 13. — P. 769–781.
  30. Povoroznyuk V. V. Osteoarthritis and postmenopause. Medical menopause / V. V. Povoroznyuk, N. V. Grigorieva. — Yaroslavl: Litera, 2006. — Р. 728–747.
  31. Bone mineral density in osteoarthritis / V. Živković, B. Stamenković, J. Nedović et al. // Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis. — 2010. — Vol. 27, № 3. — P. 135–141.
  32. Holmberg S. Knee osteoarthritis and body mass index: a population-based case-control study / S. Holmberg, A. Thelin, N. Thelin // Scand. J. Rheumatol. — 2005. — Vol. 34, № 1. — P. 59–64.
  33. Bultnik I. E. Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: what is the overlap? / I. E. Bultnik, W. F. Lems // Curr. Reumatol. Rep. — 2013. — Vol. 15, № 5. — P. 328.
  34. Dequeker J. Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis / Antropometric distinctions / J. Dequeker, P. Goris, R. Uytterhoeven // JAMA. — 1983. — Vol. 249. — P. 1448–1455.
  35. Dequeker S. J. Inverse relationship osteoarthritis-osteoporosis: what is the evidence? What are the consequences? / J. Dequeker, S. Boonen, J. Aerssens, R. Westhovens // British J. Rheumatology. — 1996. — Vol. 35. — P. 813–820.
  36. WHO: «Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group». World Health Organization technical report series 843 [Электронный ресурс]. — 1994. — Режим доступа к докум.: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ageing/9241208430/en/.
  37. Kanis J. A. Diagnosis of osteoporosis assessment of fracture risk / J. A. Kanis // Lancet. — 2002. — 359 p.
  38. Dedukh N.V. Bone: structural and functional features of aging / N. V. Dedukh // Problems osteologії. — 2007. — T. 10, № 3–4. — Р. 9–15.
  39. Riggs B. L. Osteoporosis: еtiology, diagnosis and management / B. L. Riggs, L. G. Melton. — Lippincott: Raven Publisher, 1995. — 524 p.
  40. Association of radiographically evident osteoarthritis with higher bone mineral density and increased bone loss with age. The Rotterdam Study / H. Burger, P. L. van Daele, E. Odding et al. // Arthritis Rheum. — 1996. — Vol. 39, № 1. — P. 81–86.
  41. Radiographic osteoarthritis of hip and bone mineral density. The study of osteoporotic fractures research group / M. C. Nevitt, N. E. Lane, J. C. Scott et al. // Arthritis Rheum. — 1995. — Vol. 38, № 7. — Р. 907–916.
  42. Bone mineral density is not related to osteophyte formation in osteoarthritis of the hip / K. Okano, K. Aoyagi, K. Chiba et al. // J. Rheumatology. — 2011. — Vol. 38, № 2. — Р. 358–361.
  43. A co-twin control study of the relationship between hip osteoarthritis and bone mineral density / L. A. Antoniades, A. J. Macgregor, M. Matson, T. D. Spector // Arthritis Rheum. — 2000. — Vol. 43, № 7. — Р. 1450–1455.
  44. Increased bone mineral content and bone size in the femoral neck of men with hip osteoarthritis / J. P. A. Arokoski, M. H. Arokoski, J. S. Jurvelin et al. // Ann. Rheum. Dis. — 2002. — Vol. 61. — P. 145–150.
  45. Bone mineral density and knee osteoarthritis in elderly men and women. The Framingham study / M. Hannan, P. Anderson, Y. Zhang // Arthritis & Rheumatism. — 1993. — Vol. 36, № 12. — Р. 1671–1680.
  46. Joint space narrowing and Kellgren-Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: an analytic literature synthesis / P. S. Emrani, J. N. Katz, C. L. Kessler et al. // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. — 2008. — Vol. 16, № 8. — Р. 873–882.
  47. Bone mineral density and risk of incident and progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham Study / Y. Zhang, M. T. Hannan, C. E. Chaisson et al. // J. Rheumatol. — 2000. — Vol. 27. — P. 1032–1037.
  48. Progression of osteoarthritis of the hand and metacarpal bone loss. A twenty–year follow up of incident cases / M. R. Sowers, D. Zobel, L. Weissfeld et al. // Arthritis Rheum. — 1991. — Vol. 34. — Р. 36–42.
  49. Hochberg M. C. Bone mineral density and osteoarthritis: data from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging / M. C. Hochberg, M. Lethbridge-Cejku, J. D. Tobin // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. — 2004. — Vol. 12, Suppl. A. — Р. S45–S48.
  50. The relationship of bone density and fracture to incident and progressive radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee: the Chingford study / D. J. Hart, С. Cronin, M. Daniels et al. // Arthritis Rheum. — 2002. — Vol. 46, № 1. — Р. 92–99.
  51. The incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for cementless total joint replacement / T. J. Mаkinen, J. J. Alm, H. Laine et al. // Bone. — 2007. — Vol. 40, № 4. — Р. 1041–1047.
  52. The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the knee joints and joints of the hands of persons with different indices of bone mass density: Proceedings of the Third Russian Symposium on Osteoporosis / L. I. Alekseeva, L. I. Benevolenskaya, E. E. Mikhailov, A. V. Smirnov. — StP., 2000. — 78 р.
  53. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis / C. De Laet, J. A. Kanis, A. Odén et al. / Osteoporos Int. — 2005. — Vol. 16, № 11. — P. 1330–1338.
  54. Altered bone mineral metabolism in patients with osteoarthritis [Электронный ресурс] / M. Yasser, El. Miedany, N. Annie et al. — Режим доступа к докум.: http://cts.shams.edu.eg/staff/cv/1504919083_Yasser_Mahros_Abd_ElHaleem.pdf.
  55. Epidemiology of lumbar osteoporosis and osteoarthritis and their causal relationship — is osteoarthritis a predictor for osteoporosis or vice versa?: the Miyama study / N. Yoshimura, S. Muraki, H. Oka et al. // Osteoporos Int. — 2009. — Vol. 20, № 6. — Р. 999–1008.
  56. Bone mineral density and bone turnover in spinal osteoarthrosis / N. A. Barrington, N. F. A. Peel, A. Blumsohn et al. // Annals Rheumatic Diseases. — 1995. — Vol. 54. — P. 867–871.
  57. Sex difference in the validity of vertebral deformities as an index of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a population survey of older men and women / G. Leidig-Bruckner, B. Limberg, D. Felsenberg et al. // Osteoporosis Int. — 2000. — Vol. 11, № 2. — Р. 102–119.
  58. Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women / G. Jones, C. White, T. Nguyen et al. // Osteoporosis Int. — 1996. — Vol. 6, № 3. — Р. 233–239.
  59. Relationship between spine osteoarthritis, bone mineral density and bone turn over markers in postmenopausal women / L. Ichchou, F. Allali, S. Rosto et al. // BMC Womens Health. — 2010. — Vol. 10. — P. 25.
  60. Toroptsova N. V. Relationship osteoporosis and osteoarthritis [electronic resource] / N. V. Toroptsova // Lechaschyy doctor. - 2006. - Mode of access to the doc.: http://www.lvrach.ru/2006/02/4533438/.
  61. Dequeker J. Osteoarthritis protects against femoral neck fracture: the MEDOS experience / J. Dequeker, O. Johnell // Bone. — 1993. — Vol. 14. — Р. S51–S56.
  62. Cumming R. G. Epidemiological study of the relation between arthritis of the hip and hip fractures. / R. G. Cumming, R. J. Klineberg // Ann Rheum Dis. — 1993. — Vol. 52, № 10. — P. 707–710.
  63. Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group / N. K. Arden, M. C. Nevitt, N. E. Lane et al. // Arthritis. Rheum. — 1999. — Vol. 42, № 7. — Р. 1378–1385.
  64. Osteoarthritis, bone density, postural stability, and osteoporotic fractures: a population based study / G. Jones, T. Nguyen, P. N. Sambrook et al. // J. Rheumatol. — 1995. — Vol. 22. — P. 921–925.
  65. Bone parameters across different types of hip osteoarthritis and their relationship to osteoporotic fracture risk / M. C. Castaño-Betancourt, F. Rivadeneira, S. Bierma-Zeinstra et al. // Arthritis Rheum. — 2013. — Vol. 65, № 3. — P. 693–700.
  66. Arthritis increases the risk for fractures--results from the Women’s Health Initiative / N. C. Wright, J. R. Lisse, B. T. Walitt et al. // J. Rheumatol. — 2011. — Vol. 38, № 8. — P. 1680–1688.
  67. Risk factors for the development of hip osteoarthritis: a population-based rospective study / R. Juhakoski, M. Helivaara, O. Impivaara et al. // Rheumatology (Oxford). — 2009. — Vol. 48. — Р. 83–87.
  68. Periarticular osteoporosis in osteoarthritis of the knee / R. L. Karvonen, P. R. Miller, D. A. Nelson et al. // J. Rheumatol. — 1998. — Vol. 25. — Р. 2187–2194.
  69. Korzh N. A Osteoarthritis: conservative therapy / N. A. Korzh, A. N. Hvisyuk, N. V. Dedukh. — H.: Golden Pages, 2007. — 424 р.
  70. Goldring S. R. Role of bone in osteoarthritis pathogenesis / S. R. Goldring // Med. Clin. North. Am. — 2009. — Vol. 93, № 1. — P. 25–35.
  71. Bone mineral density and joint cartilage: four clinical settings of a complex relationship in osteoarthritis / G. Herrero-Beaumont, J. A. Roman-Blas, R. Largo et al. // Ann. Rheum. Dis. — 2011. — Vol. 70. — P. 1523–1525.
  72. The electron microscope appearance of the subchondral bone plate in the human femoral head in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis / B. Li, D. Marshall, M. Roe, R. M. Aspden // J. Anat. — 1999. — Vol. 195. — Р. 101–110.
  73. Micro-CT and mechanical evaluation of subchondral trabecular bone structure between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis / Z. M. Zhang, Z. C. Li, L. S. Jiang et al. // Osteoporosis Int. — 2009. — Vol. 21, № 8. — Р. 1383–1390.
  74. Alekseeva L. I. Role of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis / L. I. Alekseeva, E. M. Zaitseva // Scientific and practical rheumatology. — 2009. — № 4. — Р. 41–48.
  75. Subchondral bone microstructural damage by increased remodelling aggravates experimental osteoarthritis preceded by osteoporosis / M. Bellido, L. Lugo, J. A. Roman-Blas, S. Castaneda et al. // Arthritis Res. Ther. — 2010. — Vol. 12, № 4. — P. 152.
  76. Shuba N. M. Osteoporosis — the actual problem of the XXI century: current understanding of the pathogenesis and therapy / N. M. Shuba // Ukrainian revmatolohycheskyy zhurnalі. — 2008. — T. 2, № 32. — Р. 5–14.
  77. Inflammatory markers and the risk of hip fracture: The women’s health initiative / K. E. Barbour, R. Boudreau, M. E. Danielson et al. // J. Bone Miner. Res. — 2012. — Vol. 27. — P. 1167–1176.
  78. RANK, RANKL and osteoprotegerin in bone biology and disease / H. L. Wright, H. S. McCarthy, J. Middleton et al. // Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. — 2009. — № 2. — Р. 56–64.
  79. Zupan J. The relationship between osteoclastogenic and anti-osteoclastogenic pro-inflammatory cytokines differs in human osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone tissues / J. Zupan, R. Komadina, J. Marc // J. Biomed. Sci. — 2012. — Vol. 19, № 1. — Р. 28.
  80. RANKL/OPG in primary cultures of osteoblasts from postmenopausal women. Differences between osteoporotic hip fractures and osteoarthritis / M. Giner, J. Rios, J. Montoya et al. // J. Steroid Biochem. Molecular Biology. — 2009. — Vol. 113. — P. 46–51.
  81. Clowes J. A. The role of the immune system in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis / J. A. Clowes, B. L. Riggs, S. Khosla // Immunol Rev. — 2005. — Vol. 208. — Р. 207–227.
  82. Thomas T. New actors in bone remodelling: a role for the immune system / T. Thomas // Bull. Acad. Natl. Med. — 2010. — Vol. 194, № 8. — Р. 1493–1503.
  83. Tumor necrosis factor alpha can contribute to focal loss of cartilage in osteoarthritis / C. I. Westacott, A. F. Barakat, L. Wood et al. // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. — 2000. — Vol. 8, № 3. — P. 213–221.
  84. RANKL/OPG ratio and DKK-1 expression in primary osteoblastic cultures from osteoarthritic and osteoporotic subjects / A. Corrado, A. Neve, A. Macchiarola et al. // J. Rheumatol. — 2013. — Vol. 40, № 5. — P. 684–694.
  85. Hildebrandt G. Degenerative joint disease activated osteoarthrosisdeformans: hip, knee, shoulder and other joints / G. Hildebrandt, F. H. Kamprad // Radiotherpy for non-malignant disorders. — 2008. — Part. 3. — Р. 317–332.
  86. Relationship between low bone mineral density and varus deformity in postmenopausal women with knee osteoarthritis / Y. Akamatsu, N. Mitsugi, N. Taki et al. // J. Rheumatol. — 2009. — Vol. 36, № 3. — Р. 592–597.
  87. Buckland-Wright C. Subchondral bone changes in hand and knee osteoarthritis detected by radiography / C. Buckland-Wright // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. — 2004. — Suppl. A. — P. S10–S19.
  88. Subchondral bone sclerosis in osteoarthritis: not just an innocent bystander / D. Lajeunesse, F. Massicotte, J. P. Pelletier et al. // Modern Rheumatology. — 2003. — Vol. 13. — Р. 7–14.
  89. Pang J. Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: a review / J. Pang, Y. L. Cao, Y. Y. Shi. // ZhongguoGu Shang. — 2011. — Vol. 24, № 8. — Р. 702–704.
  90. Li B. Mechanical and material properties of the subchondral bone plate from the femoral head of patients with osteoarthritis or osteoporosis / B. Li, R. Aspden // Ann Rheum Dis. — 1997. — Vol. 56, № 4. — Р. 247–254.
  91. Petty C. A. Does arthroscopic partial meniscectomy result in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review with a minimum of 8 years follow-up / C. A. Petty, J. H. Lubowitz // Arthroscopy. — 2011. — Vol. 27. — P. 419–424.
  92. MRI evaluation of isolated arthroscopic partial meniscectomy patients at a minimum five-year follow-up / R. J. Williams, K. K. Warner, F. A. Petrigliano et al. // HSSJ — 2007. — № 3 — P. 35–43.

Downloads

How to Cite

Korzh, M., Yakovenchuk, N., & Dedukh, N. (2014). Osteoporosis and osteoarthrosis: pathogenetically interrelated diseases? (Review of literature). ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (4), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720134102-110

Issue

No. 4 (2013)

Section

DIGESTS AND REVIEWS

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Mykola Korzh, Mykola Yakovenchuk, Ninel Diedukh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).