Orthosis peculiarities in children with neuromuscular diseases

Authors

  • Irina Chernyshova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720101124-132

Keywords:

neuromuscular diseases, children, orthosing

Abstract

The restoration of the function of standing and walking in children with severe neurological diseases, deficit of muscle activity, coordination of movements and orthostatic instability is called a difficult urgent problem. The orthopaedic means, compensating for the absent function of weight-bearing capacity and walking, include hinged orthosis systems on  the lower extremities and vertebral column, parapodium, reciprocal orthosis complex and reciprocal orthoses with different modifications; they provide back-and-forth walking, which is equivalent to the natural one. The author states that, when rehabilitating seriously ill neurological patients with marked restrictions of their physical abilities, the above orthopaedic technique means improve these patients’ ability to stand and walk and postpone the moment of their complete dependence on the wheelchair. The use of such means is a promising direction in this field.

References

  1. Клінічні рекомендації до стандартів діагностики, лікування та реабілітації новонароджених (недоношених, доношених) з ураженням нервової системи [Текст] / В. В. Бережний, Є. Є. Шунько, В. Ю. Мартинюк та ін. // Соціальна педіатрія і реабілітологія [зб. наук. праць]. — К.: Інтермед, 2007. — Вип. 1 (ІV). — С. 27–34.
  2. Роль физической реабилитации в восстановлении двигательных возможностей у детей с ДЦП [Текст] / Л. К. Воронянская, М. А. Борисов, С. В. Ковалева, Н. Ю. Трегуб // Соціальна педіатрія і реабілітологія [зб. наук. праць]. — К.: Інтермед, 2007. — Вип. 1 (ІV). — С. 200–202.
  3. Ненько А.М. Комплексное санаторно-курортное лечение наследственных нервно-мышечных заболеваний [Текст] / А.М. Ненько, М.В. Сиротюк: [метод. пособие для врачей]. — Евпатория, 2004. — 56 с.
  4. Пат. 4946156, США, МПК А63В 23/04. Ортезы или протезы для координации движений нижних конечностей / Д. Харт. — № 211474; заявл. 24.06.88; опубл. 07.08.90.
  5. Пат. 5320590, США, МПК F63В 23/04. Ортопедический механизм для колебательных реципрокных движений бедер / К. Поплавский — № 991281; заявл. 15.12.92; опубл. 14.06.94.
  6. Пат. 494628, США, МПК А63В 23/04. Реципрокные аппараты бедер / К. Поплавский — № 375210; заявл. 30.06.89; опубл. 23.10.90.
  7. Пат. 469708, США, МПК А61N 1/36. Система, помогающая передвижению / Ларсон и др. –№ 734945; заявл. 16.05.85; опубл. 06.10.87.
  8. Пат. 82776, Україна, МПК А63В 23/04. Апарат для ходьби та стояння / В.В. Бублiй та ін. –№ а200610144; заявл. 22.09.06; опубл.12.05.08.
  9. Методики реабилитации детей с использованием реципрокного аппарата (RGO) при некоторых неврологических заболеваниях [Текст] / В. Г. Петров, И. Н. Чернышева, Е. В. Варешнюк и др. // Вестн. Всерос. гильдии протезистов-ортопедов. — 2008. — № 3 (33). — С. 53.
  10. Резник Б. Л. Врожденные пороки развития у детей [Текст] / Б. Л. Резник, В. Н. Запорожан, И. П. Минков. — Одесса: АО «Бахва», 1994. –С. 1–10.
  11. Салеева А. Д. Клинический опыт мобилизации пациентов с прогрессирующими нервно-мышечными заболеваниями [Текст] / А. Д. Салеева, В. . Петров, И. Н. Чернышева // Укр. вісник психоневрології. — 2007. — № 1 (50). — С. 109.
  12. Титце Б. Обучение ходьбе пациентов с симптоматикой спинального паралича — за и против в выборе ортезов [Текст] / Б. Титце, К. Шретер // Лечебная физкультура и массаж — 2006. — №1 (25). — С. 49–53.
  13. Применение реципрокного ортеза в медицинской реабилитации детей с нервно-мышечными заболеваниями [Текст] / И. Н. Чернышева, С. Д. Шевченко, В. Г. Петров и др. // Ортопед. травматол. — 2009. — № 3. — С. 16–20.
  14. Шенк Н. А. Лечебное протезирование в ортопедии [Текст] / Н. А. Шенк. — М.: Медицина, 1975. — C. 112-113.
  15. Beckman J. The Lousiana State University Reciprocating Gait Orthosis [Text] / J. Beckman // Phisiotherapy. — 1987. — N 73. — P. 386–392.
  16. Breed A. The mid lumbar myelomeningocele hip: mechanism of dislocation and treatment [Text] / A. Breed, P. Healy // Pediatr. Orthop. — 1998. — Vol. 12, N 1. — Р. 15–24.
  17. Сampbell J. Lower extremity orthoses for spinal cord injury [Text] / J. Campbell, J. Tyomas, Moore. — 1997. Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devises [Third edition]. — Mosby–YearBook. Inc. — Chapter 25. — P. 543–554.
  18. Cheril King Burley. Rehabilutation for the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis Candidate [Text] / Cheril King Burley // Newsletters and Journals, ISIB. — 1997. — Vol. 20, N 4. — Р. 315–324.
  19. Cheril King Burley. Rehabilutation for the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis Candidate [Text] / Cheril King Burley // Newsletters and Journals, ISIB. — 1985. — Vol. 20, N 3. — P. 46.
  20. Clark M. W. Bracing in Myelomeningocele [Text] / M. W. Clark // Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices [Third Edition]. — Mosby–YearBook. Inc., 1997. — Chapter 37. — Р. 543–554.
  21. Davidson H. M. The Isocentric Reciprocating Gait Orthosis [Text] / H. M. Davidson // APO Newsletter. — 1993. — Р. 12–15.
  22. Deitz V. Spinal cord lesion: effects of and perspectives for treatment [Text] / V. Deitz // Neural Plast. — 2001. — N 8 (1–2). — P. 83–90.
  23. Douglas R. The LSU reciprocating gait orthosis [Text] / R. Douglas, P. F. Larson, R. D. Ambrosia //Orthopedics. — 1983. — N 6. — P. 834–839.
  24. Douglas R. Orthotic Management of the Paraplegic Child. Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (a Pictoral Description and Application Manual) [Text] / R. Douglas // Fillauer. Inc. (USA). — 2001. — P. 6–8.
  25. Douglas R. Indications and contraindications for use of the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (a Pictoral Description and Application manual) [Text] / R. Douglas // Fillauer. Inc. (USA). — 2001. — P. 9.
  26. The Paralytic Hip and Pelvis Obliquity in Cerebral Palsy and Myelomeningocele [Text] / D. F. Drummond, E. J. Rogale, R. Cruess, M. Moreau // AAOS, Inst. Course Lect. — 1979. — Vol. 28, XXV. — P. 7–34.
  27. Pat. 13100B Latvijas Republikas. Civeka Kustibu vadisanas reciprokalas pienemiens un reciprokala ortozu sistema visam kermeni / E. Dukendjiev. — № 13100В. 19.06.2002.
  28. Feiwell E. The effects of hip reduction on function in patients with myelomeningocele [Text] / E. Feiwell, D. Sakai, T. Blatt // JBJS. — 1978. — N 60A. — P. 167–173.
  29. Rehabilitation of walking for paraplegic patients by means of a tredmill [Text] / F. Felici, M. Bernardi, A. Radio et al. // Spinal Cord. — 1997. — Vol. 35, N 6. — P. 383–385.
  30. Functional ambulator in Myelodysplasia: The Effect of Orthotic Slection on Phyiologic Performance [Text] / F. Flandry, S. Burke, J.M. Robert et al. // Pediatric Orthop. — 1986. — Vol. 6, N 6. — P. 661–665.
  31. Partial body weight support with tredmill locomotion to improve gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: a single-subject experimental design [Text] / M. B. Gardner, M. K. Holden, J. M. Leikauskas, R. L. Richard // Phys. Ther. — 1998. — N 78 (4). — P. 361–374.
  32. Gram M. C. The Parapodium. Woodridge IL [Text] / M. C. Gram // MM Therapeutics. — 1991.
  33. Energy expenditure during gait using the Walkabout and Isocentric Reciprocating Gait Orthosis in persons with paraplegia [Text] / L. A. Harvey, G. M. Davis, M. B. Smith, S. Engal // Arch. Phis. Med. Rehabil. — 1998. — N 79. — P. 945–949.
  34. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles [Text] / S. Hirocawa, M. Grimm, M. Solomonow et al. // Archives of Phisical medicine and rehabilitation 09. — 1990. — N 71(9). — P. 687–694.
  35. The influence of the reciprocal cable linkage in the advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis on paraplegic gait performance [Text] / M. J. Ijerman, G. Baardman, H. J. Hermens et al. // Psosthet. Orthot. Int. — 1997. — N 21. — P. 52–61.
  36. Jefferson R. J. Performance of three walking orthoses for the paralysed: A case study using gait analysis [Text] / R. J. Jefferson, M. W. Whittle // Prosthet Orthot Int. — 1990. — № 14. — Р. 103–110.
  37. Raport on a conference on motor prostheses for workplace mobility of paraplegic patients in North America [Text] / G. Kantor, B. J. Andrevs, E. B. Marsolas et al. // Paraplegia. — 1993. — N 31. — P. 439–456.
  38. Comparative study of conventional hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses versus reciprocating gait orthoses for children with high-level paraparesis [Text] / D. E. Katz, N. Haideri, K. Song, P. Wyrick // Pediatr. Orthop. — 1997. — N 17(3). — P. 377–386.
  39. The use of the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis in Myelomeningocele [Text] / J. Kenneth, Guidera, Ellen Raney et al. // Newsletters and Journals. ACPOC News. — 1995. — Vol. 1, N 3. — P. 6–8.
  40. Kit Shanks. RPT Physical Therapy and Training. Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (a pictoral Description and Application Manual) [Text] / Kit Shanks // Fillauer Inc. (USA) — 2001. — P. 44.
  41. Kralj A. Enhancement of gait restoration in spinal injured patients by functional electrical stimulation [Text] / A. Kralj, T. Bajd, R. Turc // Clin. Orthop. Rehab. Res. –1988. — N 233. — P. 34–43.
  42. Constraint-indused movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients [Text] / A. Kunkel, B. Kopp, G. Muller et al. // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. –1999. — N 80(6). — P. 624–628.
  43. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients [Text] / L. Liepert, W. H. Miltner, H. Bauder et al. // Neurosci Lett. — 1998. — N 250(1). — P. 5–8.
  44. Lindseth R. E. Polypropylene Lower Extremity Braces for Paraplegia Due to Myelomeningocele [Text] / R. E. Lindseth, J. Glancy // JBJS. — 1974. — N 56A 3. — P. 556–563.
  45. Advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (ARGO) in paraplegic patients [Text] / M. A. Lissens, L. Peeraer, D. Tirez, R. Lisens // Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. — 1993. — N 3. — P. 147.
  46. Lindseth R. Treatment of the Lower Extremity in Children Paralyzed by Myelomeningocele at Birth to 18 Months [Text] / R. Lindseth // AAOS, Inst. Course Lect. — 1976. — Vol. 25, XXV. — P. 76–81.
  47. McCall R. E. Surgical Treyment in Patients with Myelodisplasia before Using the LSU Reciprocating–Gait System [Text] / R. E. McCall, R. Douglas, N. Rightor // Rthopedics. — 1983. — Vol. 6, N 7. — P. 843–848.
  48. Michael J. W. Lower Limb Orthoses [Text] / J. W. Michael // Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices. — London: Mosby–Year Book, Year book. — 1997. — Chapter 37. — P. 209–224.
  49. Voight L. M. Musculoskeletal interventions: tehniques for therapeutic exercisr [Text] / L. M. Voight, B. J. Hoogenboom, W. E. Prentice // Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data. — 2007. — Chapter 3. — P. 424.
  50. Evaluation of safety and rehabilitee in an infant reciprocal walking orthosis. Technical note [Text] / K. Miller, P. J. Woolam, N. Jones et al. // Procthetics and Orthotics international. — 2002. — Vol. 26, N 2. — P. 163–167.
  51. Motloch W. New Item for the Spina Bifida Programe [Text] / W. Motloch, M.A. Wallace // Interclinic Infor. — 1970. — Bull. 9. — N 10. — P. 10–13.
  52. Motloch W. The parapodium: an orthotic device for neuromuscular disoders [Text] / W. Motloch // Artif. Limbs. — 1971. — N 15. — P. 7–47.
  53. Orthotic compensation for non-functioning hip extensors [Text] / C. Ogilvie, N. Messenger, P. Bowker, D.L. Rowley // Ztitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. — 1988. — Vol. 43. — P. 33–35.
  54. Phillips C. A. Electrical muscle stimulation in combination with a reciprocating gait gait orthosis for ambulation by paraplegics [Text] / C. A. Phillips // Biomed.Eng. — 1989. — N 11. — P. 338–344.
  55. Richard E. Surgical treatment in the reciprocating gait orthosis (f pictoral description and application manual) [Text] / E. Richard, M. D. McCall // Fillauer. Inc. (USA). –2001. — P. 10–13.
  56. A comparison of Hip Guadanct with Reciprocating Gait Orthosis in children with spinal paraplegia: results of a ten-year prospective study [Text] / J. E. Robb, L. Gordon, D. Ferguson et al. // European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. — 1999. — N 9 (Suppl 1). — P. 15–8.
  57. The energy expenditure index: a method to quantitate and compare walking energy expenditure [Text] / J. Rose et al. // Pediatr. Orthop. — 1991. — N 11. — P. 571–578.
  58. Robert R. Reciprocat. Gait Orth. (RGO) [Электронный ресурс] / R. R. Madigan, K. D. Fillauer. — Режим доступа: http://www.fillauer com/education/ED RGO.html.
  59. Scrutton D. R. A reciprocating brace with polyplanar hip hinges used on spina bifida children [Text] / D.R. Scrutton // Phisiotherapy. — 1971. — N 57. — P. 61–66.
  60. The RGO generation: II. Muscle stimulation powered orthosis as a practical walking system for thoracic paraplegics [Text] / M. Solomonov et al. // Orthopedics. — 1989. — N 12. — P. 1309–1315.
  61. Beneficial effects of RGO,s on bladder and bowel function in paraplegia patients [Text] / J. L. Sun, S. Z. Zhong, Y.T. Ouyang et al. // Orthopedics. — 2008. — N 28(6). — P. 1019–1021.
  62. Walker Gait Analisis of Powered Gait Orthosis for Paraplegic [Text] / Sung Jae Kang, Jei Cheoug Ryu, Yu Hyuk Moon et al. // World Congress on Medical Phisics and Biomedical Engineering [Imaging the Future Medicine]. — 2006. COEX Seul, Korea.
  63. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles [Text] / J. L. Sun, S. Z. Zhong, Y. T. Ouyang, Q. L. Xian // Arch. Phys. Mtd. Rehabil. — 1990. — N 71. — P. 687–694.
  64. Restoration of functional gaitin paraplegic patient with the RGO — ІІ hybrid orthosis.A multicentre controlled study І [Text] / P. Thoumie, B. Perrouin-Verbe, G. Le Claire et al. // Clinical exalution. Paraplegia. — 1995. — N 33(11). — P. 647–653.
  65. Restoration of functional gait in paraplegic patients with RGO — ІІ hybrid orthosis. A multicenter controlled study ІІ [Text] / P. Thomie, G. Le Claire, J. Beillot et al. // Phisiological evalution. Paraplegia. — 1995. — N 33(11). — P. 654–659.
  66. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping [Text] / E. Toub, L. E. Crago, L. D. Burgio et al. // Exp. Anal. Behav. — 1994. — N 61(2). — P. 281–293.
  67. Wise Young. Efficiency of intensive training treatment of impellent function / Young Wise, W. M.Keck [Электронный ресурс]. — Режим доступа: http://cci-rus.com/rehabilitation/effects.htm.
  68. Woolridge C. Spina bifida orthosis program presented at the Workshop on brasing of children with paraplegia from spina bifida and Cerebral Palsi [Text] / C. Woolridge // National Academi of Sciense, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. — 1969.

Downloads

How to Cite

Chernyshova, I. (2010). Orthosis peculiarities in children with neuromuscular diseases. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720101124-132

Issue

No. 1 (2010)

Section

DIGESTS AND REVIEWS

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Irina Chernyshova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).