Orthoses for dynamic stretching of contractures of knee joints in children

Authors

  • Pavel Bayev
  • Viktor Pivovarov
  • Sergey Korneev
  • Vladymyr Petrov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872019287-92

Keywords:

contractures, knee joint, dynamic stretching, orthotics, designs, knee joints

Abstract

Conservative treatment of knee joint contractures with dynamic orthoses (DO) is an important step in rehabilitation of children with pathologies of the musculoskeletal system.

Objective: To determine the possibility of using DO on knee-ankle joint (foot) with pneumatic cylinders and knee joints with a flat spiral spring for conservative treatment of contractures of knee joints in children.

Methods: 7 children completed a course of rehabilitation treatment with new designs of DO (with knee joints with a flat spiral spring or pneumatic cylinders) for flexion contractures of knee joints with the background of neurological diseases. The feature of DO with a flat spiral spring is the ability to perform dynamic linear correction of flexion/extension contractures of knee joints. The use of hinges allows the use of a constant correction force, which is created using a selected individually adjustable flat spiral spring, over a long period. DO with pneumatic cylinders allow to carry out dynamic correction of the flexion contractures of the knee joint with a linear force that depends on the gas pressure in the pneumatic cylinder and usually decreases by 30 % in case of complete compression of the latter.

Results: The testing of the proposed DO confirmed the effectiveness of their use and the expediency of introduction of new designs of orthopedic products at Ukrainian industrial enterprises.

Conclusions: Conservative treatment with new designs of DO for stretching of knee joint contractures in children is a sufficiently effective means of eliminating the pathological position of the joint and restoring a significant amount of movement in it. The designed constructions of DO will allow an individual approach to each patient, depending on the nature of the disease, its severity and the anatomical features of the child.

Author Biographies

Pavel Bayev

Ukrainian Research Institute of Prosthetics, Prosthesis Making and Working Capacity Restoration, Kharkiv

Viktor Pivovarov

Ukrainian Research Institute of Prosthetics, Prosthesis Making and Working Capacity Restoration, Kharkiv

Sergey Korneev

Ukrainian Research Institute of Prosthetics, Prosthesis Making and Working Capacity Restoration, Kharkiv

Vladymyr Petrov

Ukrainian Research Institute of Prosthetics, Prosthesis Making and Working Capacity Restoration, Kharkiv

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

References

  1. Bakulev, A. N. (1959). Big Medical Encyclopedia: 36 t. Moscow: Medgiz. (in Russian)
  2. Farmer, S. E., & James, S. E. (2001). Contractures in orthopaedic and neurological conditions: a review of causes and treatment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23 (13), 549–558. doi: 10.1080/09638280010029930
  3. Williams, P. E. (1990). Use of intermittent stretch in the prevention of serial sarcomere loss in immobilised muscle. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 49 (5), 316–317. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.5.316
  4. Warren, C. G., Lehmann, J. F., & Koblanski, J. N. (1976). Heat and stretch procedures: an evaluation using tail tendon. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 57 (3), 122–126.
  5. Williams, P. E., Catanese, T., Lucey, E. G., & Goldspink, G. (1988). The importance of stretch and contractile activity in the prevention of connective tissue accumulation in muscle. Journal of Anatomy, 158, 109–114.
  6. Booth, C. M., Cortina-Borja, M. J., & Theologis, T. N. (2007). Collagen accumulation in muscles of children with cerebral palsy and correlation with severity of spasticity. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43 (5), 314–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2001.tb00211.x
  7. Alter, M. J. (1996). Connective tissue: a limiting factor of flexibility. Science of flexibility. Leeds: Human Kinetics.
  8. Ultraflex Europe. Training manual. Dirame Ortho. — Brussels, Belgium: Ultraflex Systems Inc, 2000.
  9. Korneev, S. V., Pivovarov, V. V., Baev, P. A., Zaytsev, M. V., & Tovkach, S. P. (2018). Knee joint for lower limbs orthoses. Patent 117529 UA (in Ukrainian)
  10. Baev, P. A., Pivovarov, V. V., Korneev, S. V., Petrov, V. G., & Tovkach, S. P. (2018). Knee joint for lower limbs orthoses. Patent 117169 UA. (in Ukrainian)
  11. ORLAU Manual. The contracture correction device for treatment of knees. UK ORLAU Publishing Ltd, 2003.
  12. . Farmer, S. E., Woollam, P. J., Patrick, J. H., Roberts, A. P., & Bromwich, W. (2005). Dynamic orthoses in the management of joint contracture. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 87-B (3), 291–295. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15445
  13. Lunsford, T. R., & Wallace, J. M. (1997). Orthotic Prescription. Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices. Mosby-Year Book. Inc.

How to Cite

Bayev, P., Pivovarov, V., Korneev, S., & Petrov, V. (2019). Orthoses for dynamic stretching of contractures of knee joints in children. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872019287-92

Issue

Section

IN AID OF PRACTING DOCTOR. LECTURES