Modern tendencies in osteosynthesis of metaphyseal and metadiaphyseal fractures of long bones (a review of literature)

Authors

  • Olexiy Tyazhelov
  • Nataliya Poletaeva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872013296-101

Keywords:

osteosynthesis, metaphyseal and metadiaphiseal fractures, fixation

Abstract

The literature review highlights the problem of finding the optimal treatment of unstable and metadiafizarnyh metaphyseal fractures of long bones. The advantages and disadvantages of outdoor, intramedullary, osteosynthesis of these fractures, the specificity with respect to the indications for each of these methods.

References

  1. Limits of palmar locking-plate osteosynthesis of unstable distal radius fractures / R. Arora, M. Lutz, R. Zimmermann et al. // Handchir Mikrochir. Plast. Chir. — 2007. — Vol. 39, № 1. — P. 34–41.
  2. Bedi A. Surgical treatment of nonarticular distal tibia fractures / A. Bedi, T. T. Le, M. A. Karunakar // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. — 2006. — Vol. 14, № 7. — P. 406–416.
  3. Buckley R. General Principles of Fracture Care [Электронный ресурс] / R. Buckley, D. A. Carlo, M. D. Panaro. — overview. — 2012. — Режим доступа: http://www.eMedicine.medscape.com/article/1270717.
  4. Fixation principles in metaphyseal bone — a patent based review / R. Curtis, J. Goldhahn, R. Schwyn et al. // Osteoporos. Int. — 2005. — Vol. 16, № 2. — P. 54–64.
  5. Does fibular plating improve alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures? / K. A. Egol, R. Weisz, R. Hiebert et al. // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2006. — Vol. 20, № 2. — P. 94–103.
  6. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures / B. Füchtmeier, R. May, J. Fierlbeck et al. // J. Technology Health Care. — 2006. — Vol. 14, № 4–5. — P. 261–270.
  7. Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants / B. Füchtmeier, R. May, R. Hente et al. // J. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. — 2007. — Vol. 127, № 6. — P. 441–447.
  8. Treatment of epiphyseo-metaphyseal fractures in children with an original implant. The threaded pin with an adjustable lock (Fixano) / P. Gicquel, M. C. Giacomelli, C. Karger, J. M. Clavert // Oper. Orthop. Traumatol. — 2005. — Vol. 17, № 1. — P. 51–65.
  9. Use of a distraction plate for distal radial fractures with metaphyseal and diaphyseal comminution. Surgical technique / T. A. Ginn, D. S. Ruch, C. C. Yang, D. P. Hanel // J. Bone Joint Surg. — 2006. — Vol. 88-A, № 1. — P. 29–36.
  10. Greatting M. D. Intrafocal (Kapandji) pinning of unstable fractures of the distal radius / M. D. Greatting, A. T. Bishop // Orthop. Clin. North. Am. — 1993. — Vol. 24, № 2. — P. 301–307.
  11. Hartin N. Retrograde nailing versus fixed-angle blade plating for supracondylar femoral fractures: a randomized controlled trial / N. Hartin, I. Harris, K. Hazratwala // ANZ Journal of Surgery. — 2006. — Vol. 76, № 5. — Р. 290–294.
  12. Hertel R. Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone / R. Hertel // Osteoporos Int. — 2005. — Vol. 16, № 2. — P. 65–72.
  13. Open reduction and palmar plate-osteosynthesis in combination with a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite spacer in the treatment of comminuted fractures of the distal radius / F. X. Huber, J. Hillmeier, L. Herzog et al. // J. Hand Surg [Br]. — 2006. — Vol. 31, № 3. — P. 298–303.
  14. Janssen K. W. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail : A retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients / K. W. Janssen, J. Biert, A. van Kampen // J. Int. Orthop. — 2007. — Vol. 31, № 5. — P. 709–714.
  15. Reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis for juxta-ar-ticular nonunions with bone loss / T. Kabata, H. Tsuchiya, K. Sakurakichi et al. // J. Trauma. — 2005. — Vol. 58, № 6. — P. 1213–1222.
  16. Use of Hoffman external fixation for extra-articular upper metaphysealtibial fractures / A. Khorbi, N. Haddad, M. Chebil et al. // Tunis Med. — 2006. — Vol. 84, № 1. — P. 21–25.
  17. A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates / J. Korner, G. Diederichs, M. Arzdorf et al. // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2004. — Vol. 18, № 5. — P. 286–293.
  18. A randomized, controlled trial of distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity: closed reduction and casting versus closed reduction, spanning external fixation, and optional percutaneous K-wires / H. J. Kreder, J. Agel, M. D. McKee et al. // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2006. — Vol. 20, № 2. — P. 115–121.
  19. Fractures of the distal third of the humerus with palsy of the radial nerve: management using minimally-invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis / B. Livani, W. D. Belangero, R. Castro de Medeiros // J. Bone Joint Surg. — 2006. — Vol. 88-B, № 12. — P. 1625–1628.
  20. Mueller C. A. Primary stability of various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia / C. A. Mueller, C. Eingartner, E. Schreitmueller // J. Bone Joint Surg. — 2005. — Vol. 87-B, № 3. — P. 426–432.
  21. Namazi H. Awful considerations with LCP instrumentation: a new pitfall / H. Namazi, K. Mozaffarian // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. — 2007. — Vol 127, № 7. — Р. 573–575.
  22. Nolting J. Treatment of hypertrophic non union of the distal tibial shaft with percutaneously inserted locking plate Initial report on experience in 4 cases / J. Nolting, R. Wirbel, A. Seekamp // Unfallchirurg. — 2006. — Vol. 109, № 3. — P. 256–260.
  23. Intramedullary nailing of proximal quarter tibial fractures / S. E. Nork, D. P. Barei, T. A. Schildhauer et al. // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2006. — Vol. 20, № 8. — P. 523–528.
  24. Plecko M. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the locking proximal humerus plate / M. Plecko, A. Kraus // Oper. Orthop. Traumatol. — 2005. — Vol. 17, № 1. — P. 25–50.
  25. Cancellous allograft versus autologous bone grafting for repair of comminuted distal radius fractures: a prospective, randomized trial / G. P. Rajan, J. Fornaro, O. Trentz, R. Zellweger // J. Trauma. — 2006. — Vol. 60, № 6. — P. 1322–1329.
  26. Rayhack J. M. The history and evolution of percutaneous pinning of displaced distal radius fractures / J. M. Rayhack // Orthop. Clin. North. Am. — 1993. — Vol. 24, № 2. — P. 287–300.
  27. Rikli D. A. Distal radius fractures: new concepts as basis for surgical treatment / D. A. Rikli, R. Babst, J. B. Jupiter // Handchir. Mikrochir. Plast. Chir. — 2007. — Vol. 39, № 1. — P. 2–8.
  28. Rousselon T. Dynamic biomechanical study of a new osteosynthesis system for distal radius fractures / T. Rousselon, K. Guelmi // Chir. Main. — 2006. — Vol. 25, № 6. — P. 293–297.
  29. Siebert H. R. Fracture of the distal radius / H. R. Siebert, A. Klonz // Chirurg. — 2006. — Vol. 77, № 6. — P. 545–562.
  30. The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates / E. J. Strauss, D. Alfonso, F. J. Kummer et al. // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2007. — Vol. 21, № 3. — P. 172–177.
  31. Intrafocal (Kapandji) pinning of distal radius fractures with and without external fixation / T. E. Trumble, W. Wagner, D. P. Hanel et al. // J. Hand Surg. — 1998. — Vol. 23, № 3. — P. 381–394.
  32. Weil W. M. Treatment of distal radius fractures with intrafocal (kapandji) pinning and supplemental skeletal stabilization / W. M. Weil, T. E. Trumble // Hand Clin. — 2005. — Vol. 21, № 3. — P. 317–328.
  33. Wong E. W. Percutaneous plating of lower limb long bone fractures / E. W. Wong, E. W. Lee // Injury. — 2006. — Vol. 37, № 6. — P. 543–553.
  34. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: Plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing / S. W. Yang, H. M. Tzeng, Y. J. Chou et al. // J. Injury. — 2006. — Vol. 37, № 6. — P. 531–535.
  35. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures / B. A. Zelle, M. Bhandari, M. Espiritu et al. // J. Orthop Trauma. — 2006. — Vol. 20, № 1. — P. 76–79.
  36. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005) / M. Zlowodzki, M. Bhandari, D. J. Marek et al. // J. Orthop. Trauma. — 2006. — Vol. 20, № 5. — P. 366–371.
  37. Sergeev S. V. The quenching osteosynthesis. Whether really method of a choice? / S. V. Sergeev // Osteosynthesis. — 2007. — Т. 1, № 1. — С. 7–14.
  38. Shvets A. I. Intramedullary a quenching osteosynthesis in treatment of fractures of distal part of a hip / A. I. Shvets, V. K. Ivchenko // Trauma. — 2007. — Т. 8, № 4. — С. 439–443.

Downloads

How to Cite

Tyazhelov, O., & Poletaeva, N. (2013). Modern tendencies in osteosynthesis of metaphyseal and metadiaphyseal fractures of long bones (a review of literature). ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872013296-101

Issue

No. 2 (2013)

Section

DIGESTS AND REVIEWS

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Olexiy Tyazhelov, Nataliya Poletaeva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).