Differentiated approach to the choice of the acetabular component at total hip replacement in patients with dysplastic hip arthritis

Authors

  • Oleg Loskutov SІ «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Helth Ukraine», Ukraine
  • Oleksandr Loskutov SІ «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Helth Ukraine», Ukraine
  • Ksenia Furmanova SІ «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Helth Ukraine», Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872019138-44

Keywords:

dysplastic hip arthritis, atrhroplasty, choice of acetabular component

Abstract

After the total hip arthroplasty in patients with dysplastic hip arthritis (DHA), the number of complications associated with implant instability, in particular, the acetabular component, remains high.

Objective: to develop the concept of differentiated choice of acetabular component at different stages of process with national modular implants ORTEN.

Methods: 322 patients with DHA (394 total hip arthroplasty) were examined. According to Crowe classification, DHA I degree was detected in 40 (12.4 %) cases, II — 142 (44.1 %), III — 126 (39 %), IV — 14 (4.4 %). A severe degree of DHA was defined in 282 (87.6 %) patients. Modular implants ORTEN were used in 361 (91.6 %) cases, Zimmer — in 24 (6.1 %), Stryker — in 9 (2.3 %).

Results: in order to work out the concept of differentiated choice of acetabular component in patients with DHA, we evaluated the degree of deformation, depth of the acetabulum, the possibility to achieve the primary and secondary stability of the acetabular component. We designed and certified the modular implants ORTEN with screwed or press-fit acetabular component, or with cemented type of fixation. Non cemented acetabular component of small sizes are designed. Threaded projections of screwed acetabular component provide high stability of fixation in cases with segmental and central defects of acetabulum. Indications to apply at DHA — II, III and IV degrees, I — with concomitant osteoporosis. Acetabular component, with press-fit fixation were used in cases of DHA I and II degrees without significant segmental defects. Cement cups were used in patients with DHA with concomitant osteoporosis. Revision surgeries due to acetabular component instability in the period of 1–10 years were made in 18 (4.6 %) patients: with screwed acetabular component — 11 (3.4 %), with those that were press-fit — 7 (13.7 %).

Conclusions: press-fit acetabular component, are better to use in the cases of DHA I and II degrees in the absence of large bone defects; screwed — in cases of osteopenia and osteoporosis, DHA II and III degrees, in cases of deepening of the acetabulum bottom and mediation of acetabular component.

Author Biography

Oleg Loskutov, SІ «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Helth Ukraine»

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

References

  1. Zagorodniy, N. V. (2011). Endoprosthetics of the hip joint. Fundamentals and practice: guidance. Moscow, M.: GEOTAR-Media. (Russia)
  2. Binazzi, R. (2011). Equatorial fins enhance press-fit of cementless cups in dysplastic acetabular: comparative results of 3 different models. 12th EFFORT Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  3. Imbuldeniya, A. M., Walter, W. L., Zicat, B. A., & Walter, W. K. (2014). Cementless total hip replacement without femoral osteotomy in patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96-B (11), 1449–1454. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.96b11.33698
  4. Schofer, M. D., Pressel, T., Schmitt, J., Heyse, T. J., & Boudriot, U. (2011). Reconstruction of the acetabulum in THA using femoral head autografts in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 6 (1), 32. doi:10.1186/1749-799x-6-32
  5. Rogers, B. A., Garbedian, S., Kuchinad, R. A., Backstein, D., Safir, O., & Gross, A. E. (2012). Total Hip Arthroplasty for Adult Hip Dysplasia. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 94 (19), 1809–1821. doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.00779
  6. Tankut, V. A. (2013). Mistakes and complications of primary hip replacement, its prophylaxis and treatment. In V. A. Filippenko, A. V. Tankut, & O. A. Podgaiskaya, Actual problems of prosthetics of joints. Materials of scientific and practical conferences with international participation (рр. 93–95). Kyiv. (Ukraine)
  7. Corten, K., Bourne, R. B., Charron, K. D., Au, K., & Rorabeck, C. H. (2011). Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed with and without Cement: A Randomized Trial. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 93 (14), 1335–1338. doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.00448
  8. Hartofilakidis, G., Karachalios, T., Georgiades, G., & Kour¬laba, G. (2011). Total hip arthroplasty in patients with high dislocation: a concise follow-up, at minimum of fifteen years, of previous reports. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Am., 93 (17), 1614–1618. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00875
  9. Kobayashi, S., Saito, N., Nawata, M., Horiuchi, H., Iorio, R., & Takaoka, K. (2003). Total hip arthroplasty with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 85 (4), 615–621. doi:10.2106/00004623-200304000-00005
  10. Shah, R., & Porter, S. (2005). Evolution of cemented stems. Ortopaedics, 28 (8), s819–s825.
  11. Pakvis, D., Van Hellemondt, G., De Visser, E., Jacobs, W., & Spruit, M. (2011). Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. International Orthopaedics, 35 (8), 1109–1118. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1234-6
  12. Loskutov, O. A. (2017). Biomechanical justification of the choice of the acetabular component in endoprosthetics of patients with dysplastic coxarthrosis. Orthopedics, traumatology and prosthetics, 2, 14–22. doi: 10.15674 / 0030-59872017214-22. (Ukraine)
  13. Karachalios, T., Roidis, N., Lampropoulou-Adamidou, K., & Hartofilakidis, G. (2013). Acetabular reconstruction in patients with low and high dislocation. The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B (7), 887–892. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.31216
  14. Dearborn, J. T., & Harris, W. H. (2000). Acetabular Revision After Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Congenital Hip Dislocation and Dysplasia. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 82 (8), 1146–1153. doi:10.2106/00004623-200008000-00012
  15. Hi¬rotake, Y., Hirotsugu, O., Fumiaki, I. & [et al.] (2011). Cementless cup fixation for Crowe I–III hip dysplasia. 12th EFFORT Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  16. Li, H., Mao, Y., Oni, J. K., Dai, K., & Zhu, Z. (2013). Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip with more than 30 % lateral uncoverage of uncemented acetabular components. The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B (9), 1178–1183. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.95b9.31398
  17. Kim, Y., Kim, J., Park, J., Joo, J., & Lieberman, J. R. (2011). Hybrid and Cementless Total Hip Replacements in Patients Younger Than Fifty Years of Age Were Similar After Eighteen Years. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 93 (22), 2123. doi:10.2106/jbjs.9322.ebo191
  18. Zebolds, S., & Jumtins, A. (2011). The comparison of preoperative planning and postoperative radiographic outcome after THR in dysplastic hip patients. 12th EFFORT Con-gress. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  19. Karachalios, T. (2013). Current Evidence on Designs and Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty. European Instructional Lectures, 197–207. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36149-4_15
  20. Effenberger, H., Imhof, M., & Witzel, U. (2004). Form, Material und Modularität der Schraubp¬fanen. Schraubpfannen, Frankfurt, 47–76.
  21. Pitto, R., & Schikora, N. (2004). Acetabular reconstruction in developmental hip dysplasia using reinforcement ring with a hook. International Orthopaedics, 28 (4). doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0559-9
  22. Siebenrock, K. A., Tannast, M., Kim, S., Morgenstern, W., & Ganz, R. (2005). Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Roof Reinforcement Ring With Hook for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip-Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 20 (4), 492–498. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.045
  23. Shetty, A. A., Sharma, P., Singh, S., Tindall, A., Kumar, S. V., & Rand, C. (2004). Bulk femoral-head autografting in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for acetabular dysplasia. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 19 (6), 706–713. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.032
  24. Günther, K., Al-Dabouby, F., & Bernstein, P. (2009). How to Do a Cementless Hip Arthroplasty. European Instructional Lectures, 9, 189–202. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00966-2_19

Downloads

How to Cite

Loskutov, O., Loskutov, O., & Furmanova, K. (2023). Differentiated approach to the choice of the acetabular component at total hip replacement in patients with dysplastic hip arthritis. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872019138-44

Issue

No. 1 (2019)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Oleg Loskutov, Oleksandr Loskutov, Ksenia Furmanova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).