Stress-strain state of the flat-valgus foot model in case of implants usage for subtalar arthrorisis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872018374-79

Keywords:

flat-valgus foot deformity, correction, arthrorisis, modeling

Abstract

The flat-valgus foot deformity is one of the most common pathologies of the bone-joints system. flat-valgus foot deformity leads to the development of hallux valgus, excessive torsion of the crus, valgus deformation at the ankle and knee joints.

Objective: to analyze the stress-strain state of the foot elements in the case of the results of experimental lumbar posterior-lateral fusion with platelet rich fibrin and after its correction with screws for subtalar arthroris.

Methods: a biomechanical (mathematical) study was made with the finite element method on the foot model in normal and with The results of experimental lumbar posterior-lateral fusion with platelet rich fibrin. We performed subtalar arthroris with corrective screws, implanted into the calcaneus or talus bones.

Results: in case of the results of experimental lumbar posterior-lateral fusion with platelet rich fibrin increases the level of stress in all the elements of its bone model, especially on the supporting surfaces of the calcaneus and the surfaces of subtalar joint. At screws fixation there are two areas of high stresses (in the contact of the bone elements of the model with screws) with absolute values exceeding the parameters of the model with the results of experimental lumbar posterior-lateral fusion with platelet rich fibrin. Strain distribution was almost equal in cases of screw implantation in the calcaneus or talus bones. The highest stresses in the talus (12.5 MPa) were lower in the model with screws implanted into the calcaneus (11.1 МПа), so this option can be considered to be better.

Conclusions: usage of screw for subtalar arthrorisis allows to reduce stresses compared to the model with implants for arthroeresis, with the exception of contact points of bone with screws.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Korolkov

Lviv Regional Children’s Specialized Clinical Hospital. Ukraine

MD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Paviel Rakhman

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Mykhaylo Karpinsky

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

Igor Shishka

Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital. Ukraine

PhD in Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Oleksandr Yaresko

Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv

References

  1. Harris, E. J., Vanore, J. V., Thomas, J. L., Kravitz, S. R., Mendelson, S. A., Mendicino, R. W., Silvani, S. H., Gassen, S. C. (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 43(6), 341–373. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2004.09.013
  2. Gould, N., Moreland, M., Alvarez, R. [et al.] (1989) Development of the child’s arch. Foot Ankle, 9(5), 241–245.
  3. Morley, A. J. (1957). Knock-knee in Children. BMJ, 2(5051), 976–979. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5051.976
  4. Mosca, V. S. (2010). Flexible flatfoot in children and adolescents. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 4(2), 107–121. doi:10.1007/s11832-010-0239-9
  5. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. (1987). The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 69(3), 426–428. doi:10.2106/00004623-198769030-00014
  6. Sheikh Taha, A. M., & Feldman, D. S. (2015). Painful flexible flatfoot. Foot and Ankle Clinics, 20(4), 693–704. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2015.07.011
  7. Giannini, S. (1998). Operative treatment of the flatfoot: why and how. Foot & Ankle International, 19(1), 52–56. doi:10.1177/107110079801900111
  8. LeLi, J. (1970). Current concepts and correction in the valgus foot. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (70), 43-55. doi:10.1097/00003086-197005000-00005
  9. Magnan, B., Baldrighi, C., Papadia, D. et al. (1997) Flatfeet: comparison of surgical techniques. Result of study group into retrograde endorthesis with calcaneus-stop. Italian Journal of Pediatrics Orthop., 13, 28–33.
  10. Beguiristain-Gúrpide, J. L. Lógica Clínica en Cirugía Ortopédica de la Parálisis Cerebral. Revista de neurologia, 37(1), 51–54.
  11. Agapov, V. P. (2000) finite element Method in statics, dynamics and stability of thin-walled spatially reinforced structures: textbook. Moscow: Publishing house. (in Russia)
  12. Berezovskyi, V. A., & Kolotilov, N. N. (1990) Biophysical characteristics of human tissue: Directory. Kiev: Naukova dumka. (in Ukraine)
  13. Gere, J. M., & Timoshenko, S. P. (1997) Mechanics of Material. Boston: PWS Publishing Company.
  14. Zenkevich, O. K. (1978) Finite element method in engineering. Moscow: Mir. (in Russia)
  15. Alyamovskii, A. A. (2004) SolidWorks/COSMOSWorks. Engineering analysis by finite element method. Moscow: DMK Press. (in Russia)
  16. Korolkov, O., Rakhman, P., Karpinsky, M., Shishka, I., & Yaresko, O. (2018). Characteristics of stress-strain foot model before and after subtalar arthroereisis with implants at the treatment of flatfoot (message 2). Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, 1, 65-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872018165-71 (in Ukraine)

How to Cite

Korolkov, O., Rakhman, P., Karpinsky, M., Shishka, I., & Yaresko, O. (2023). Stress-strain state of the flat-valgus foot model in case of implants usage for subtalar arthrorisis. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872018374-79

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES