Retrospective analysis of complications after surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis in children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872018339-44Keywords:
congenital kyphosis, surgical treatment, complications, decancellation, vertebroectomyAbstract
Congenital kyphosis occurs as a result of a disruption in the formation or vertebral segmentation in the presence of active semi-vertebra, characterized by rapid progression and, as a rule, development of significant neurological complications. The main surgeries at congenital kyphosis are: ventral and/or posterior fusion in situ, with or without metal devices, vertebroectomy and osteotomy in different modifications. Among postoperative complications in patients with congenital kyphosis, the most common are neurological and fractures of metal devices.
Objective: to conduct a retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes of the treatment of congenital kyphosis in children.
Methods: case histories were analyzed, patients with congenital kyphosis, whose age did not exceed 18 years, and the follow-up period was at least 2 years after the operation. We assessed the value of the total and local kyphosis, lumbar lordosis. Infectious complications, deformity progression, as well as the complications associated with the instability of metal devices were analyzed.
Results: of the 25 patients, 5 had complications: metal device instability with the loss of correction in 3 cases, the infectious — 1, the increase in total kyphosis — 1. In 4 patients revision surgeries were made.
Conclusions: use of existing technologies for surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis leads to development of complications after operations. Their main reasons were tactical errors associated with inadequate evaluation of growth potential of the spine, as well as instability of metal devices due to lack of mature bone block. It is necessary to create a technology that can model the growth of the spine and contribute the bone block in the place of osteotomy.
References
- Dickson, R. A., Stamper, P., Sharp, A. M., & Harker, P. (1980). School screening for scoliosis: cohort study of clinical course. BMJ, 281(6235), 265–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.281.6235.265
- McMaster, M. J., & Singh, H. (2001). The surgical management of congenital kyphosis and kyphoscoliosis. Spine, 26(19), 2146–2154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200110010-00021
- Zhao, H., Weng, X., Qiu, G. [et al.] (1999) The surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao, 21(2), 146–150.
- Winter, R. B., Moe, J. H., & Lonstein, J. E. (1985). The surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis. Spine, 10(3), 224–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198504000-00006
- Song, Y., Liu, L., Kong, Q., Zeng, J., Wang, L., Pei, F., … Li, T. (2011). Comparison of one-stage anteroposterior and posterior-alone hemivertebrae resection combined with posterior correction for hemivertebrae deformity: Results of 60 patients. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 45(6), 492. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.87115
- Wang, Y., & Lenke, L. G. (2011). Vertebral column decancellation for the management of sharp angular spinal deformity. European Spine Journal, 20(10), 1703–1710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1771-0
- Zeng, Y., Chen, Z., Qi, Q., Guo, Z., Li, W., Sun, C., & Liu, N. (2012). The posterior surgical correction of congenital kyphosis and kyphoscoliosis: 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up. European Spine Journal, 22(2), 372–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2463-0
- Zeng, Y., Chen, Z., Guo, Z., Qi, Q., Li, W., & Sun, C. (2013). Complications of correction for focal kyphosis after posterior osteotomy and the corresponding management. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, 26(7), 367–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0b013e3182499237
- Lenke, L. G., Newton, P. O., Sucato, D. J., Shufflebarger, H. L., Emans, J. B., Sponseller, P. D., … Blanke, K. M. (2013). Complications After 147 Consecutive vertebral column resections for severe pediatric spinal deformity. Spine, 38(2), 119–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318269fab1
- Papadopoulos, E. C, Boachie-Adjei, O., Hess, W. F., Sanchez Perez-Grueso, F. J., Pellisé, F., Gupta, M., Lonner, B., Paonessa, K., Faloon, M., Cunningham, M. E., Kim, H. J., Mendelow, M., Sacramento, C., Yazici, M. (2013) Early outcomes and complications of posterior vertebral column resection. Spine Journal, 5(5), 983–991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.023
- Kim, Y. J., Otsuka, N. Y., Flynn, J. M. [et al.] (2001) Surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis. Spine, 26(20), 2251–2257.
- Viviani, G. R., Raducan, V., Bednar, D. A., Grandwilewski, W. (1993) Anterior and posterior spinal fusion: comparison of one-stage and two-stage procedures. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 36(5), 468–473.
- Mezentsev, A. A., Kudimov, S., A., Petrenko, D. E. (2005) Complication of surgical treatment on anterior vertebral column. Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, 1, 37–40. (in Ukraine)
- Mezentsev, A. A., Petrenko, D. E., Barkov, A. A. (2007) Result of scoliosis surgical treatment using SRS-30. Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, 4, 17–21. (in Ukraine)
- Radchenko, V. A., Mezentsev, A. A., Korolkov, A. I., Petrenko, D. E. (2006) Variation of spinal-pelvic balance in orthopedic patients Chronicle of traumatology and orthopedics, 1–2, 60–63.
- Radchenko, V. A., Korzh, N. A. (2004) Mannual of tabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine. Kharkiv: Prapor. (in Ukraine)
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Andrey Mezentsev, Dmytro Demchenko, Dmytro Petrenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).