Problems of improving the results of surgical treatment of the pelvic injuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872018316-23Keywords:
pelvis, surgery book, repositions, osteosynthesis, ventral and dorsal parts, sacro-iliac joint, amphyarthrosisAbstract
Among all fractures, pelvic injuries are 5–8 %, and combined trauma — 30–58 %. The level of mortality due to unstable pelvic fractures ranges from 10 to 18 %, and in patients with polytrauma — 36.5–50 %.
Objective: to analyze the organizational problems of treating patients with pelvic injuries in Ukrainian clinics and to propose ways of their solutions.
Methods: a retrospective study of surgical treatment results of patients with pelvic fractures was made. Patients of group 1 osteosynthesis of pelvic bone fractures were carried out in the traumatological departments of the Kyiv City Clinical Hospital of Emergency Care in 1991–2007 and the Orthopaedic and Traumatology Center of the Kyiv Regional Clinical Hospital (KRCH) in 2002–2009, group 2 in KRCH 2010–2017. The differences between tactical and surgical approaches were studied, results were obtained. For the analysis a system of functional characteristics of the pelvic fractures of Majeed was used.
Results: consequences of surgical treatment in group 1 were studied in 119 patients (58.3 %) with unstable pelvic injuries in 12 months and later after trauma. An excellent result was registered in 11 patients (9.2 %), good in 48 (40.3 %), satisfactory — 51 (42.9 %), unsatisfactory — 9 (7.6 %). In group 2, the results of treatment were evaluated in 114 (61.2 %) patients: excellent result was in 21 (18.4 %), good in 55 (48.2 %), satisfactory — 31 (27.2 %), unsatisfactory — 7 (6.2 %).
Conclusions: due to mastering the methods of osteosynthesis of pelvic fractures at special courses and introducing them into practice, due to correspondent equipment of the department and operation room the amount of complications was decreased to 11.1 %, unsatisfactory — to 1.4 %, and a percentage of good and excellent results was increased to 17.1 %.
References
- Ankin, L. N. (2007) Pelvic injuries and acetabular fractures. St. Petersburg : Book Plus. (in Russian)
- Ankin, L. N. (2009) Problems of improving the treatment of pelvic injuries. Orthopedics, traumatology and prosthetics, 2, 96–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872009296-101 (in Russian)
- Cherkes-Zade, D. I. (2006) Treatment of pelvic injuries and their consequences. Moscow. (in Russian)
- Guthrie, H. C., Owens, R. W., Bircher, M. D. (2010) Fractures of the pelvis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Br., 92(11), 1481–1488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.25911
- Hak, D. J., Smith, W. R., & Suzuki, T. (2009). Management of hemorrhage in life-threatening pelvic fracture. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 17(7), 447-457. doi:https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200907000-00005
- Hauschild, O., Strohm, P. C., Culemann, U., Pohlemann, T., Suedkamp, N. P., Koestler, W., & Schmal, H. (2008). Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German Pelvic Injury Register. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 64(2), 449–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31815982b1
- Siegmeth, A., Müllner, T., Kukla, C., & Vécsei, V. (2000). Accompanying injuries in severe pelvic trauma. Der Unfallchirurg, 103(7), 572–581. (in German)
- Tile, M., Helfet, D. L., Kellam, J. F. [et al.] (2015) Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum principles and methods of management (4th ed.). Davos : Publishing.
- Tornetta, P., Matta, J. M. (1996) Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (329), 186–193.
- Majeed, S. (1989). Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 71-B(2), 304–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.71b2.2925751
- Burgess, A. R., Eastridge, B. J., Young, J. W., Ellison, T. S., Ellison, P. S., Poka, A., … Brumback, R. J. (1990). Pelvic ring disruptions. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 30(7), 848–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199007000-00015
- Balogh, Z., Caldwell, E., Heetveld, M., D, S., Schlaphoff, G., Harris, I., & Sugrue, M. (2005). Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference? The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 58(4), 778–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000158251.40760.b2
- Biffl, W. L., Smith, W. R., Moore, E. E., Gonzalez, R. J., Morgan, S. J., Hennessey, T., … Burch, J. M. (2001). Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Annals of Surgery, 233(6), 843–850. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200106000-00015
- Smith, W., Williams, A., Agudelo, J., Shannon, M., Morgan, S., Stahel, P., & Moore, E. (2007). Early predictors of mortality in hemodynamically unstable pelvis fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 21(1), 31–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e31802ea951
- Burlew, C. C., Moore, E. E., Smith, W. R., Johnson, J. L., Biffl, W. L., Barnett, C. C., & Stahel, P. F. (2011). Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 212(4), 628–635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.020
- Cothren, C. C., Osborn, P. M., Moore, E. E., Morgan, S. J., Johnson, J. L., & Smith, W. R. (2007). Preperitonal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a paradigm shift. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 62(4), 834–842. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31803c7632
- Matta, J. M. (1996). Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 329, 88–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608000-00011
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Mykola Ankin, Taras Petryk, Lev Ankin, Viktoriia Ladyka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.
The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).