Ventral and posterior corrective spondylosyndesis in surgical treatment of scoliotic deformities of Lenke types I and V: a meta analysis of literature data

Authors

  • Dmytro Petrenko
  • Andrey Mezentsev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872012339-41

Keywords:

spondylosyndesis, idiopathic scoliosis, meta analysis

Abstract

Information sources, which compared results of use of ventral derotative spondylosyndesis (VDS) and posterior corrective spondylosysndesis (PCS) with polysegmental structures for correcting scoliotic deformities of Lenke types I and V, were analysed. It was revealed that application of VDS techniques for correcting spinal curvatures of Lenke types I and V ensured a higher value of the frontal correction, a smaller length of the spinal fixing as well as a smaller intraoperative blood loss versus PCS.

References

  1. Baron S. L. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / S. L. Baron, D. Kondrashov, F. Siddiqi // JJS. — 2007. — Vol. 89-A, Suppl. 2. — P. 142–156.
  2. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis / R. R. Betz, J. Harms, D. H. Clements, L. G. Lenke // Spine. — 1999. — Vol. 24 (3). — P. 225–239.
  3. Burton D. C. Patient-based outcomes analysis of patients with single torsion thoracolumbar-lumbar scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation: an average 5- to 9-year follow-up study / D. C. Burton, M. A. Asher, S. M. Lai // Spine. — 2002. — Vol. 27 (21). — P. 2363–2367.
  4. Bhandari M. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis / M. Bhandari, P. J. Devereaux, M. F. Swiontkowski // JBJS. — 2003. — Vol. 85A. — P. 1673–1681.
  5. Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices / M. J. Geck, A. Rinella, D. Hawthorne, A. Macagno // Spine. — 2009. — Vol. 34 (18). — P. 1942–1951.
  6. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee / J. D. Coe, V. Arlet, W. Donaldson, S. Berven // Spine. — 2006. — Vol. 31. — P. 345–349.
  7. Hee H. T. Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis / H. T. Hee, Z. R. Yu, H. K. Wong // Spine. — 2007. — Vol. 32 (14). — P. 1533–1542.
  8. Comparison of selective anterior versus posterior screw instrumentation in Lenke5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / M. Li, J. Ni, X. Fang et al. // Spine. — 2009. — Vol. 34 (11). — P. 1162–1166.
  9. Muschik M. T.Comparison of anterior and posterior double-rod instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of 141 patients / M. T. Muschik, H. Kimmich, T. Demmel // Eur. Spine J. — 2006. — Vol. 15 (7). — P. 1128–1138.
  10. Potter B. K. Radiographic outcomes of anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for treatment of Lenke Type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves / B. K. Potter, T. R. Kuklo, L. G. Lenke // Spine. — 2005. — Vol. 30 (16). — P. 1859–1866.
  11. A comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for restoring and retaining sagittal balance in patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis / F. Tao, M. Li, Z. Wang, F. Pan // J. Spinal Disord. Tech. — 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
  12. Anterior versus posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / V. Tolo, S. Skaggs, L. Storer, K. Friend // J. Bone Joint Surg. — 2005. — Vol. 87-B. — P. 296–310.
  13. Suk S. I. Comparison of Zielke ventral derotation system and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis / S. I. Suk, C. K. Lee, S. S. Chung // Spine. — 1994. — Vol. 19 (4). — Р. 419–429.
  14. Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study / Y. Wang, Q. Fei, G. Qiu, C. I. Lee // Spine. — 2008. — Vol. 33 (20). — P. 2166–2172.
  15. Comparison of surgical treatment in single thoracolumbar-lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior versus posterior surgery / S. Q. Zhan, Y. B. Chang, S. X. Zeng, Y. S. Wang // Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. — 2010. — Vol. 48 (6). — P. 419–422.

Downloads

How to Cite

Petrenko, D., & Mezentsev, A. (2012). Ventral and posterior corrective spondylosyndesis in surgical treatment of scoliotic deformities of Lenke types I and V: a meta analysis of literature data. ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS, (3), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872012339-41

Issue

No. 3 (2012)

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Dmytro Petrenko, Andrey Mezentsev

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the right of authorship of their manuscript and pass the journal the right of the first publication of this article, which automatically become available from the date of publication under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published manuscript with mandatory linking to authors of the original research and the first publication of this one in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into a separate supplemental agreement on the additional non-exclusive distribution of manuscript in the form in which it was published by the journal (i.e. to put work in electronic storage of an institution or publish as a part of the book) while maintaining the reference to the first publication of the manuscript in this journal.

The editorial policy of the journal allows authors and encourages manuscript accommodation online (i.e. in storage of an institution or on the personal websites) as before submission of the manuscript to the editorial office, and during its editorial processing because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the published manuscript citation (see The Effect of Open Access).